The Effects of Escalation of Respiratory Support and Prolonged Invasive Ventilation on Outcomes of Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of escalation of respiratory support and prolonged postoperative invasive ventilation on patient–centered outcomes, and identify perioperative factors associated with these two respiratory complications. Design: A retrospective cohort analysis of cardiac surgical patients admitted to cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) between August 2015 and January 2018. Escalation of respiratory support was defined as ‘unplanned continuous positive airway pressure’, ‘non-invasive ventilation’ or ‘reintubation’ following surgery; prolonged invasive ventilation was defined as ‘invasive ventilation beyond the first 12 hours following surgery’. The primary endpoint was the composite of escalation of respiratory support and prolonged ventilation. Setting: Tertiary cardiothoracic ICU. Participants: A total of 2,098 patients were included and analyzed. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The composite of escalation of support or prolonged ventilation occurred in 509 patients (24.3%). Patients who met the composite had higher mortality (2.9% vs 0.1%; P<0.001) and longer median [interquartile range] length of ICU (2.1 [1.0–4.9] vs 0.9 [0.8–1.0] days; P<0.0001) and hospital (10.6 [8.0–16.0] vs 7.2 [6.2–10.0] days; P<0.0001) stay. Hypoxemia and anemia on admission to ICU were the only two factors independently associated with need for escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation. Conclusions: Escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation are frequently seen in cardiac surgery patients, and are highly associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Hypoxemia and anemia on admission to ICU are potentially modifiable factors associated with escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation.ACM is supported by a Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship from the Wellcome Trust (WT 2055214/Z/16/Z). VZ is supported by an Academic Clinical Fellowship from the National Institute for Health Research (ACF-2016-09-011)

Key performance indicators in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): protocol for a systematic review

Introduction Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an intervention used in critically ill patients with severe cardiopulmonary failure that is expensive and resource intensive and requires specialised care. There remains a significant practice variation in its application. This systematic review will assess the evidence for key performance indicators (KPIs) in ECMO.Methods and analysis We will search Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Cochrane Library including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and databases from the National Information Center of Health Services Research and Health Care Technology, for studies involving KPIs in ECMO. We will rate methodological quality using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, and qualitative studies will be evaluated using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN checklist). Grey literature sources will be searched for technical reports, practice guidelines and conference proceedings. We will identify relevant organisations, industry leaders and non-profit organisations that represent key opinion leads in the use of ECMO. We will search the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality National Quality Measures Clearinghouse for ECMO-related KPIs. Studies will be included if they contain quality measures that occur in critically ill patients and are associated with ECMO. The analysis will be primarily descriptive. Each KPI will be evaluated for importance, scientific acceptability, utility and feasibility using the four criteria proposed by the US Strategic Framework Board for a National Quality Measurement and Reporting System. Finally, KPIs will be evaluated for their potential operational characteristics, their potential to be integrated into electronic medical records and their affordability, if applicable.Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval is not required as no primary data will be collected. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at academic.PROSPERO registration number 9 August 2022. CRD42022349910

The Effects of Escalation of Respiratory Support and Prolonged Invasive Ventilation on Outcomes of Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of escalation of respiratory support and prolonged postoperative invasive ventilation on patient-centered outcomes, and identify perioperative factors associated with these 2 respiratory complications. Design: A retrospective cohort analysis of cardiac surgical patients admitted to the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) between August 2015 and January 2018. Escalation of respiratory support was defined as “unplanned continuous positive airway pressure,” “non-invasive ventilation,” or “reintubation” after surgery; prolonged invasive ventilation was defined as “invasive ventilation beyond the first 12 hours following surgery.” The primary endpoint was the composite of escalation of respiratory support and prolonged ventilation. Setting: Tertiary cardiothoracic ICU. Participants: A total of 2,098 patients were included and analyzed. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The composite of escalation of support or prolonged ventilation occurred in 509 patients (24.3%). Patients who met the composite had higher mortality (2.9% v 0.1%; p < 0.001) and longer median [interquartile range] length of ICU (2.1 [1.0-4.9] v 0.9 [0.8-1.0] days; p < 0.0001) and hospital (10.6 [8.0-16.0] v 7.2 [6.2-10.0] days; p < 0.0001) stay. Hypoxemia and anemia on admission to ICU were the only 2 factors independently associated with the need for escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation. Conclusions: Escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation is frequently seen in cardiac surgery patients and is highly associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Hypoxemia and anemia on admission to the ICU are potentially modifiable factors associated with escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation

Development and Content Validation of a Multidisciplinary Standardized Management Pathway for Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Objectives:. Treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome is complex. Evidence-based therapies that can improve survival and guidelines advocating their use exist; however, implementation is inconsistent. Our objective was to develop and validate an evidence-based, stakeholder-informed standardized management pathway for hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome to improve adherence to best practice. Design:. A standardized management pathway was developed using a modified Delphi consensus process with a multidisciplinary group of ICU clinicians. The proposed pathway was externally validated with a survey involving multidisciplinary stakeholders and clinicians. Setting:. In-person meeting and web-based surveys of ICU clinicians from 17 adult ICUs in the province of Alberta, Canada. Intervention:. Not applicable. Measurements and Main Results:. The consensus panel was comprised of 30 ICU clinicians (4 nurses, 10 respiratory therapists, 15 intensivists, 1 nurse practitioner; median years of practice 17 [interquartile range, 13–21]). Ninety-one components were serially rated and revised over two rounds of online and one in-person review. The final pathway included 46 elements. For the validation survey, 692 responses (including 59% nurses, 33% respiratory therapists, 7% intensivists and 1% nurse practitioners) were received. Agreement of greater than 75% was achieved on 43 of 46 pathway elements. Conclusions:. A 46-element evidence-informed hypoxemic respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome standardized management pathway was developed and demonstrated to have content validity

Awake proning in patients with COVID-19-related hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: A rapid practice guideline

© 2023 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.This rapid practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the use of awake proning in adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19. The panel included 20 experts from 12 countries, including one patient representative, and used a strict conflict of interest policy for potential financial and intellectual conflicts of interest. Methodological support was provided by the guidelines in intensive care, development, and evaluation (GUIDE) group. Based on an updated systematic review, and the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) method we evaluated the certainty of evidence and developed recommendations using the Evidence-to-Decision framework. We conducted an electronic vote, requiring >80% agreement amongst the panel for a recommendation to be adopted. The panel made a strong recommendation for a trial of awake proning in adult patients with COVID-19 related hypoxemic acute respiratory failure who are not invasively ventilated. Awake proning appears to reduce the risk of tracheal intubation, although it may not reduce mortality. The panel judged that most patients would want a trial of awake proning, although this may not be feasible in some patients and some patients may not tolerate it. However, given the high risk of clinical deterioration amongst these patients, awake proning should be conducted in an area where patients can be monitored by staff experienced in rapidly detecting and managing clinical deterioration. This RPG panel recommends a trial of awake prone positioning in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure due to COVID-19