FDG-PET staging and importance of lymph node SUV in head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES: The role of positron emission tomography (PET) with fluoro-deoxy-glucose (FDG) in the staging of head and neck cancer (HNC) is unclear. The NCCN guidelines do not recommend FDG-PET as a part of standard workup. The purpose of this report is to examine the role of FDG-PET imaging in altering management and providing prognostic information for HNC. METHODS: Retrospective review of HNC patients who had a staging FDG-PET scan performed at either Thomas Jefferson University or University of Kansas Medical Center between the years 2001 and 2007. A total of 212 PET scans were performed in patients who went on to receive radiotherapy. RESULTS: The median follow-up time for all patients was 469 days. The PPV and NPV of PET imaging to correctly identify lymph node status was 94% and 89% respectively. Lymph nodes with extracapsular extension (ECE) had higher SUVs than nodes without ECE, 11.0 vs. 5.0 (p \u3c 0.0007). Maximum SUV for the primary tumor \u3e 8.0 was predictive of worse overall survival (p \u3c 0.045), while the SUV of the lymph nodes was predictive for distant recurrence at one year--with a mean SUV value of 10.4 for patients with distant failure vs. 7.0 without (p \u3c 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET staging in head and neck cancer has good positive and negative predictive values in determining lymph node status. The maximum SUV of the primary tumor is predictive of overall survival. This is the first report to find that the SUV of a lymph node is predictive for ECE and also for distant recurrence

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Liver Metastasis: Early Experience with the Cyberknife Robotic Radio-Surgery System

Background: The liver is a common site for malignant metastases. Surgical metastatic resection, ablative therapies, and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) all have advantages and limitations. Preliminary reports reveal SBRT treats hepatic metastases with limited toxicities. We reviewed our institution’s SBRT experience for the treatment of liver metastases to assess toxicity and outcomes.Methods: Hepatic metastases treated with SBRT were retrospectively reviewed from 2008-2010. Computed tomography (CT) identified tumor volume prior to SBRT, local recurrence and out-of-field progression after SBRT. Study endpoints were local recurrence, toxicity, and overall survival.Results: Thirty-three patients had 37 liver metastases treated with a median SBRT dose of 30Gy. Median follow-up was 8.1 months. Five lesions (13.5%) locally recurred after a median of 10.6 months. Seventeen patients had out-of-field progression (15 liver, 6 systemic) after a median of 5.1 months. Overall 23.5-month survival was 45.5%. Five patients reported nausea and seven reported pain after SBRT. There were no grade 4-5 toxicities or cases of liver failure.Conclusion: SBRT is safe and well tolerated in patients with hepatic metastases. SBRT offers a local therapy with limited toxicities to patients with lesions not amenable to traditional ablative, surgical, or regional therapies

Epithelioid Glioblastoma Presenting as Aphasia in a Young Adult with Ovarian Cancer: A Case Report

Our patient\u27s clinical history and preoperative radiographic evaluation suggested central nervous system (CNS) metastatic disease. Ultimately, final pathology revealed epithelioid glioblastoma (eGBM), a newly classified CNS primary tumor. This reinforces the importance of direct tissue sampling and including eGBM on the differential for young patients with histories of systemic cancer presenting with new CNS lesions

Validation of daily 0.35 T diffusion-weighted MRI for MRI-guided glioblastoma radiotherapy

MRI-Linac systems enable daily diffusion-weighed imaging (DWI) MRI scans for assessing glioblastoma tumor changes with radiotherapy treatment. Our study assessed the image quality of echoplanar imaging (EPI)-DWI scans compared with turbo spin echo (TSE)-DWI scans at 0.35 Tesla (T) and compared the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and distortion of EPI-DWI on 0.35 T MRI-Linac compared to high-field diagnostic MRI scanners. The calibrated National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)/Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) Diffusion Phantom was scanned on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac, and 1.5 T and 3 T MRI with EPI-DWI. Five patients were scanned on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac with a TSE-DWI sequence, and five other patients were scanned with EPI-DWI on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac and a 3 T MRI. The quality of images was compared between the TSE-DWI and EPI-DWI on the 0.35 T MRI-Linac assessing signal-to-noise ratios and presence of artifacts. EPI-DWI ADC values and distortion magnitude were measured and compared between 0.35 T MRI-Linac and high-field MRI for both phantom and patient studies. The average ADC differences between EPI-DWI acquired on the 0.35 T MRI-Linac, 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scanners and published references in the phantom study were 1.7%, 0.4% and 1.0%, respectively. Comparing the ADC values based on EPI-DWI in glioblastoma tumors, there was a 3.36% difference between 0.35 and 3 T measurements. Susceptibility-induced distortions in the EPI-DWI phantoms were 0.46 ± 1.51 mm for 0.35 MRI-Linac, 0.98 ± 0.51 mm for 1.5 T MRI and 1.14 ± 1.88 mm for 3 T MRI; for patients -0.47 ± 0.78 mm for 0.35 T and 1.73 ± 2.11 mm for 3 T MRIs. The mean deformable registration distortion for a phantom was 1.1 ± 0.22 mm, 3.5 ± 0.39 mm and 4.7 ± 0.37 mm for the 0.35 T MRI-Linac, 1.5 T MRI, and 3 T MRI scanners, respectively; for patients this distortion was -0.46 ± 0.57 mm for 0.35 T and 4.2 ± 0.41 mm for 3 T. EPI-DWI 0.35 T MRI-Linac images showed higher SNR and lack of artifacts compared with TSE-DWI, especially at higher b-values up to 1000 s/mm . EPI-DWI on a 0.35 T MRI-Linac showed superior image quality compared with TSE-DWI, minor and less distortions than high-field diagnostic scanners, and comparable ADC values in phantoms and glioblastoma tumors. EPI-DWI should be investigated on the 0.35 T MRI-Linac for prediction of early response in patients with glioblastoma

A gene expression profile test to resolve head & neck squamous versus lung squamous cancers

Background\ud The differential diagnosis between metastatic head & neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) and lung squamous cell carcinomas (lung SCC) is often unresolved because the histologic appearance of these two tumor types is similar. We have developed and validated a gene expression profile test (GEP-HN-LS) that distinguishes HNSCC and lung SCC in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens using a 2160–gene classification model.\ud \ud Methods\ud The test was validated in a blinded study using a pre-specified algorithm and microarray data files for 76 metastatic or poorly-differentiated primary tumors with a known HNSCC or lung SCC diagnosis.\ud \ud Results\ud The study met the primary Bayesian statistical endpoint for acceptance. Measures of test performance include overall agreement with the known diagnosis of 82.9% (95% CI, 72.5% to 90.6%), an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.91 and a diagnostics odds ratio (DOR) of 23.6. HNSCC (N = 38) gave an agreement with the known diagnosis of 81.6% and lung SCC (N = 38) gave an agreement of 84.2%. Reproducibility in test results between three laboratories had a concordance of 91.7%.\ud \ud Conclusion\ud GEP-HN-LS can aid in resolving the important differential diagnosis between HNSCC and lung SCC tumors.\ud \ud Virtual Slides\ud The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/175322781789093