Resident perceptions of the impact of duty hour restrictions on resident-attending interactions: an exploratory study

Background: The institution of duty hour reforms by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education in 2003 has created a learning environment where residents are consistently looking for input from attending physicians with regards to balancing duty hour regulations and providing quality patient care. There is a paucity of literature regarding resident perceptions of attending physician actions or attitudes towards work hour restrictions. The purpose of this study was to identify attending physician behaviors that residents perceived as supportive or unsupportive of their compliance with duty hour regulations. Methods: Focus group interviews were conducted with residents exploring their perceptions of how duty hour regulations impact their interactions with attending physicians. Qualitative analysis identified key themes in residents\u27 experiences interacting with faculty in regard to duty hour regulations. Forty residents from five departments in two hospital systems participated. Results: Discussion of these interactions highlighted that attending physicians demonstrate behaviors that explicitly or implicitly either lend their support and understanding of residents\u27 need to comply with these regulations or imply a lack of support and understanding. Three major themes that contributed to the ease or difficulty in addressing duty hour regulations included attending physicians\u27 explicit communication of expectations, implicit non-verbal and verbal cues and the program\u27s organizational culture. Conclusions: Resident physicians\u27 perception of attending physicians\u27 explicit and implicit communication and residency programs organization culture has an impact on residents\u27 experience with duty hour restrictions. Residency faculty and programs could benefit from explicitly addressing and supporting the challenges that residents perceive in complying with duty hour restrictions

Geographic Variation in Apical Support Procedures for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

OBJECTIVE: To measure geographic variation in rates of apical support procedures for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) among female Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study and used 100% Medicare fee-for-service claims to identify a cohort of women aged 65-99 years who had an apical support procedure, defined by Current Procedural Terminology codes, in 2016-2018. We included all vaginal and abdominal approaches (native tissue and mesh colpopexies) and obliterative procedures. We excluded vaginectomies with a diagnosis of gynecologic cancer that did not have a diagnosis for prolapse. We created rates of apical POP procedures by hospital referral region and computed coefficients of variation to measure the degree of geographic variation. RESULTS: An average of 26,005 apical POP procedures were performed annually from 2016 to 2018. The majority of patients were aged 65-74 years (64.3%), and 28.5% had concomitant hysterectomy. From 2016 to 2018, there was a mean of 1.79 apical POP procedures per 1,000 female beneficiaries performed across hospital referral regions (95% CI 1.74-1.84). Rate estimates ranged between 0.87 (95% CI 0.63-1.11) apical POP procedures per 1,000 female beneficiaries (Alexandria, Louisiana) and 3.33 (95% CI 2.91-3.74) per 1,000 beneficiaries (Akron, Ohio), a nearly fourfold difference in rates. Variation between hospital referral regions for abdominal apical prolapse procedures was the greatest (coefficient of variation 0.52). Vaginal and obliterative approaches demonstrated less variation between hospital referral regions (respectively, coefficient of variation 0.36 and 0.40). CONCLUSION: There is wide geographic variation among hospital referral regions for the treatment of POP. Women may be treated differently based on where they live and seek care, which raises questions about possible overuse in some regions and concerns about underuse and lack of access in other regions

Information Priorities for Deciding on Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Item does not contain fulltex

Post-anaesthesia pulmonary complications after use of muscle relaxants (POPULAR): a multicentre, prospective observational study

Background Results from retrospective studies suggest that use of neuromuscular blocking agents during general anaesthesia might be linked to postoperative pulmonary complications. We therefore aimed to assess whether the use of neuromuscular blocking agents is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications. Methods We did a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study. Patients were recruited from 211 hospitals in 28 European countries. We included patients (aged ≥18 years) who received general anaesthesia for any in-hospital procedure except cardiac surgery. Patient characteristics, surgical and anaesthetic details, and chart review at discharge were prospectively collected over 2 weeks. Additionally, each patient underwent postoperative physical examination within 3 days of surgery to check for adverse pulmonary events. The study outcome was the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications from the end of surgery up to postoperative day 28. Logistic regression analyses were adjusted for surgical factors and patients’ preoperative physical status, providing adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) and adjusted absolute risk reduction (ARRadj). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01865513. Findings Between June 16, 2014, and April 29, 2015, data from 22803 patients were collected. The use of neuromuscular blocking agents was associated with an increased incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients who had undergone general anaesthesia (1658 [7·6%] of 21694); ORadj 1·86, 95% CI 1·53–2·26; ARRadj –4·4%, 95% CI –5·5 to –3·2). Only 2·3% of high-risk surgical patients and those with adverse respiratory profiles were anaesthetised without neuromuscular blocking agents. The use of neuromuscular monitoring (ORadj 1·31, 95% CI 1·15–1·49; ARRadj –2·6%, 95% CI –3·9 to –1·4) and the administration of reversal agents (1·23, 1·07–1·41; –1·9%, –3·2 to –0·7) were not associated with a decreased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Neither the choice of sugammadex instead of neostigmine for reversal (ORadj 1·03, 95% CI 0·85–1·25; ARRadj –0·3%, 95% CI –2·4 to 1·5) nor extubation at a train-of-four ratio of 0·9 or more (1·03, 0·82–1·31; –0·4%, –3·5 to 2·2) was associated with better pulmonary outcomes. Interpretation We showed that the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs in general anaesthesia is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Anaesthetists must balance the potential benefits of neuromuscular blockade against the increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications