Cancer invasion: patterns and mechanisms

Cancer invasion and the ability of malignant tumor cells for directed migration and metastasis have remained a focus of research for many years. Numerous studies have confirmed the existence of two main patterns of cancer cell invasion: collective cell migration and individual cell migration, by which tumor cells overcome barriers of the extracellular matrix and spread into surrounding tissues. Each pattern of cell migration displays specific morphological features and the biochemical/molecular genetic mechanisms underlying cell migration. Two types of migrating tumor cells, mesenchymal (fibroblast-like) and amoeboid, are observed in each pattern of cancer cell invasion. This review describes the key differences between the variants of cancer cell migration, the role of epithelial-mesenchymal, collective-amoeboid, mesenchymal-amoeboid, and amoeboid- mesenchymal transitions, as well as the significance of different tumor factors and stromal molecules in tumor invasion. The data and facts collected are essential to the understanding of how the patterns of cancer cell invasion are related to cancer progression and therapy efficacy. Convincing evidence is provided that morphological manifestations of the invasion patterns are characterized by a variety of tissue (tumor) structures. The results of our own studies are presented to show the association of breast cancer progression with intratumoral morphological heterogeneity, which most likely reflects the types of cancer cell migration and results from different activities of cell adhesion molecules in tumor cells of distinct morphological structures

CD68+, but not stabilin-1+ tumor associated macrophages in gaps of ductal tumor structures negatively correlate with the lymphatic metastasis in human breast cancer

Tumor associated macrophages (TAM) support tumor growth and metastasis in several animal models of breast cancer, and TAM amount is predictive for efficient tumor growth and metastatic spread via blood circulation. However, limited information is available about intratumoral TAM heterogeneity and functional role of TAM subpopulations in tumor progression. The aim of our study was to examine correlation of TAM presence in various morphological segments of human breast cancer with clinical parameters. Thirty six female patients with nonspecific invasive breast cancer T1-4N0-3M0 were included in the study. Morphological examination was performed using Carl Zeiss Axio Lab.A1 and MiraxMidiZeiss. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence/confocal microcopy analysis was used to detect CD68 and stabilin-1 in 5 different tumor segments: (1) areas with soft fibrous stroma; (2) areas with coarse fibrous stroma; (3) areas of maximum stromal-and-parenchymal relationship; (4) parenchymal elements; (5) gaps of ductal tumor structures. The highest expression of CD68 was in areas with soft fibrous stroma or areas of maximum stromal-and-parenchymal relationship (79%). The lowest expression of CD68 was in areas with coarse fiber stroma (23%). Inverse correlation of tumor size and expression of CD68 in gaps of tubular tumor structures was found (R = −0.67; p = 0.02). In case of the lymph node metastases the average score of CD68 expression in ductal gaps tumor structures was lower (1.4 ± 0.5) compared to negative lymph nodes case (3.1 ± 1.0; F = 10.9; p = 0.007). Confocal microscopy identified 3 phenotypes of TAM: CD68+/stabilin-1−; CD68+/stabilin-1+ (over 50%); and CD68−/stabilin-1+. However, expression of stabilin-1 did not correlate with lymph node metastasis. We concluded, that increased amount of CD68+TAM in gaps of ductal tumor structures is protective against metastatic spread in regional lymph nodes

CD68+, but not stabilin-1+ tumor associated macrophages in gaps of ductal tumor structures negatively correlate with the lymphatic metastasis in human breast cancer

Tumor associated macrophages (TAM) support tumor growth and metastasis in several animal models of breast cancer, and TAM amount is predictive for efficient tumor growth and metastatic spread via blood circulation. However, limited information is available about intratumoral TAM heterogeneity and functional role of TAM subpopulations in tumor progression. The aim of our study was to examine correlation of TAM presence in various morphological segments of human breast cancer with clinical parameters. Thirty six female patients with nonspecific invasive breast cancer T1-4N0-3M0 were included in the study. Morphological examination was performed using Carl Zeiss Axio Lab.A1 and MiraxMidiZeiss. Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence/confocal microcopy analysis was used to detect CD68 and stabilin-1 in 5 different tumor segments: (1) areas with soft fibrous stroma; (2) areas with coarse fibrous stroma; (3) areas of maximum stromal-and-parenchymal relationship; (4) parenchymal elements; (5) gaps of ductal tumor structures. The highest expression of CD68 was in areas with soft fibrous stroma or areas of maximum stromal-and-parenchymal relationship (79%). The lowest expression of CD68 was in areas with coarse fiber stroma (23%). Inverse correlation of tumor size and expression of CD68 in gaps of tubular tumor structures was found (R = −0.67; p = 0.02). In case of the lymph node metastases the average score of CD68 expression in ductal gaps tumor structures was lower (1.4 ± 0.5) compared to negative lymph nodes case (3.1 ± 1.0; F = 10.9; p = 0.007). Confocal microscopy identified 3 phenotypes of TAM: CD68+/stabilin-1−; CD68+/stabilin-1+ (over 50%); and CD68−/stabilin-1+. However, expression of stabilin-1 did not correlate with lymph node metastasis. We concluded, that increased amount of CD68+TAM in gaps of ductal tumor structures is protective against metastatic spread in regional lymph nodes

Markers of Cancer Cell Invasion: Are They Good Enough?

Invasion, or directed migration of tumor cells into adjacent tissues, is one of the hallmarks of cancer and the first step towards metastasis. Penetrating to adjacent tissues, tumor cells form the so-called invasive front/edge. The cellular plasticity afforded by different kinds of phenotypic transitions (epithelial–mesenchymal, collective–amoeboid, mesenchymal–amoeboid, and vice versa) significantly contributes to the diversity of cancer cell invasion patterns and mechanisms. Nevertheless, despite the advances in the understanding of invasion, it is problematic to identify tumor cells with the motile phenotype in cancer tissue specimens due to the absence of reliable and acceptable molecular markers. In this review, we summarize the current information about molecules such as extracellular matrix components, factors of epithelial–mesenchymal transition, proteases, cell adhesion, and actin cytoskeleton proteins involved in cell migration and invasion that could be used as invasive markers and discuss their advantages and limitations. Based on the reviewed data, we conclude that future studies focused on the identification of specific invasive markers should use new models one of which may be the intratumor morphological heterogeneity in breast cancer reflecting different patterns of cancer cell invasion

Predictive value of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

The identification of informative biomarkers that could predict the treatment response is particularly important in the triple-negative (TN) breast cancer, which is characterized by biological diversity. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR2) expression and its gene polymorphisms on pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) in Russian patients with TN breast cancer. We performed a retrospective analysis of 70 women with operable TN breast cancer, who underwent NCT with 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) or cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and capecitabine (CAX) between 2007 and 2013. VEGFR2 expression was evaluated before NCT by immunohistochemistry. TaqMan SNP assays were used for genotyping KDR − 604T>C (rs2071559) and KDR 1192G>A (rs2305948) polymorphisms. The pCR was used as an end-point in the treatment efficacy analysis. In the univariate analysis, the pCR rate was strongly associated with young age (P = 0.004), high Ki67 expression (P = 0.012), lymph node negativity (P = 0.023) as well as with positive VEGFR2 expression (P = 0.019) and the CAX regimen (P = 0.005). In the multivariate analysis, only patient’s age (P = 0.005) and pre-NCT VEGFR2 expression (P = 0.048) remained significant predictors of pCR. The pCR rate was higher in the CAX-treated patients than that in the FAC-treated patients (P = 0.005). Our results revealed that − 604TT genotype of rs2071559 and age < 50 years were correlated with a pCR in the CAX-treated patients. VEGFR2 expression in pre-NCT tumors and KDR gene polymorphism can be considered as additional predictive molecular markers of pCR in Russian TN breast cancer patients treated with NCT