Need for recovery after emotional labor:Differential effects of daily deep and surface acting

\u3cp\u3eThis diary study examines the psychological processes that contribute to daily recovery from emotional labor by combining emotion regulation with work-home resources theories. We hypothesized that overall perceptions of display rules relate positively to daily deep and surface acting. Daily surface acting was expected to relate positively to exhaustion and negatively to flow during work and consequently, to a higher need for recovery at the end of the workday. In contrast, daily deep acting was hypothesized to relate positively to flow and negatively to exhaustion and consequently, to a lower need for recovery at the end of the workday. In turn, need for recovery was expected to associate negatively to vigor at bedtime through reduced relaxation during leisure. Fifty Dutch and Polish employees first filled in a survey, and then a diary for five consecutive workdays, twice per day: at the end of the workday and before sleep. Multilevel path analyses largely supported these hypotheses suggesting that surface acting has unfavorable implications, whereas deep acting has favorable implications for daily well-being at work and recovery after work.\u3c/p\u3

CHD8 interacts with CHD7, a protein which is mutated in CHARGE syndrome.

Contains fulltext : 88304.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)CHARGE syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder caused in about two-third of cases by mutations in the CHD7 gene. For other genetic diseases e.g. hereditary spastic paraplegia, it was shown that interacting partners are involved in the underlying cause of the disease. These data encouraged us to search for CHD7 binding partners by a yeast two-hybrid library screen and CHD8 was identified as an interacting partner. The result was confirmed by a direct yeast two-hybrid analysis, co-immunoprecipitation studies and by a bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay. To investigate the function of CHD7 missense mutations in the CHD7-CHD8 interacting area on the binding capacity of both proteins, we included three known missense mutations (p.His2096Arg, p.Val2102Ile and p.Gly2108Arg) and one newly identified missense mutation (p.Trp2091Arg) in the CHD7 gene and performed both direct yeast two-hybrid and co-immunoprecipitation studies. In the direct yeast two-hybrid system, the CHD7-CHD8 interaction was disrupted by the missense mutations p.Trp2091Arg, p.His2096Arg and p.Gly2108Arg, whereas in the co-immunoprecipitation studies disruption of the CHD7-CHD8 interaction by the mutations could not be observed. The results lead to the hypothesis that CHD7 and CHD8 proteins are interacting directly and indirectly via additional linker proteins. Disruption of the direct CHD7-CHD8 interaction might change the conformation of a putative large CHD7-CHD8 complex and could be a disease mechanism in CHARGE syndrome