9 research outputs found
Thromboembolic Disease in Patients With Cancer and COVID-19: Risk Factors, Prevention and Practical Thromboprophylaxis Recommendations–State-of-the-Art.
Cancer and COVID-19 are both well-established risk factors predisposing to thrombosis. Both disease entities are correlated with increased incidence of venous thrombotic events through multifaceted pathogenic mechanisms involving the interaction of cancer cells or SARS-CoV2 on the one hand and the coagulation system and endothelial cells on the other hand. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended for hospitalized patients with active cancer and high-risk outpatients with cancer receiving anticancer treatment. Universal thromboprophylaxis with a high prophylactic dose of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) or therapeutic dose in select patients, is currentlyindicated for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Also, prophylactic anticoagulation is recommended for outpatients with COVID-19 at high risk for thrombosis or disease worsening. However, whether there is an additive risk of thrombosis when a patient with cancer is infected with SARS-CoV2 remains unclear In the current review, we summarize and critically discuss the literature regarding the epidemiology of thrombotic events in patients with cancer and concomitant COVID-19, the thrombotic risk assessment, and the recommendations on thromboprophylaxis for this subgroup of patients. Current data do not support an additive thrombotic risk for patients with cancer and COVID-19. Of note, patients with cancer have less access to intensive care unit care, a setting associated with high thrombotic risk. Based on current evidence, patients with cancer and COVID-19 should be assessed with well-established risk assessment models for medically ill patients and receive thromboprophylaxis, preferentially with LMWH, according to existing recommendations. Prospective trials on well-characterized populations do not exist
High-efficiency triple-resonant inelastic light scattering in planar optomagnonic cavities
Optomagnonic cavities have recently been emerging as promising
candidates for implementing coherent photon-magnon interactions, for
applications in quantum memories and devices, and next generation
quantum networks. A key challenge in the design of such cavities is the
attainment of high magnon-mediated optical-to-optical conversion
efficiencies, which could, e.g., be exploited for efficient optical
interfacing of superconducting qubits, as well as the practicality of
the final designs, which ideally should be planar and amenable to
on-chip integration. Here, on the basis of a novel time-Floquet
scattering-matrix approach, we report on the design and optimization of
a planar, multilayer optomagnonic cavity, incorporating a
cerium-substituted yttrium iron garnet thin film, magnetized in-plane,
and operating in the triple-resonant inelastic light scattering regime.
This architecture allows for magnon-mediated optical-to-optical
conversion efficiencies of about 5% under realistic conditions, which
is orders of magnitude higher than that attained in alternative
optomagnonic designs. Our results suggest a viable way forward for
realizing practical information inter-conversion, with high
efficiencies, between microwaves, strongly coupled to magnons, and
optical photons, as well as a platform for fundamental studies of
classical and quantum dynamics in magnetic solids and for the
implementation of futuristic quantum devices
P2-169: Carboplatin and Gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy in completely resected stage I-IIIA non small cell lung cancer patients
Combined treatment with low-dose interferon plus vinblastine is associated with less toxicity than conventional interferon monotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
The outcome of treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma is disappointing. In interferon (IFN)-treated patients, the high incidence of adverse effects causes many patients to withdraw from treatment. This 12-week randomized study compared the incidence of toxicity associated with high-dose IFN monotherapy (15 x 106 U thrice weekly) and treatment with the combination of low-dose IFN (5 x 106 U thrice weekly) and 6 mg/m2 vinblastine (VBL) every 14 days in 100 consecutive patients. There was no significant difference in response rate between treatment arms (42% IFN vs. 34% IFN + VBL) or between subgroups (by tumor location). Combined treatment was associated with a significantly lower incidence of fever, fatigue, and weight loss but with a higher incidence of leukopenia. There was no significant difference in the incidence of other events. More patients treated with IFN monotherapy required bed rest, and overall treatment costs were 60% higher than for combined treatment. It is concluded that combined treatment with low-dose IFN and VBL, without loss of short-term efficacy, is better tolerated and less expensive than high-dose IFN monotherapy
Combined Treatment with Low-Dose Interferon plus Vinblastine Is Associated with Less Toxicity Than Conventional Interferon Monotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Thromboembolic Disease in Patients With Cancer and COVID-19:Risk Factors, Prevention and Practical Thromboprophylaxis Recommendations–State-of-the-Art
Cancer and COVID-19 are both well-established risk factors predisposing to thrombosis. Both disease entities are correlated with increased incidence of venous thrombotic events through multifaceted pathogenic mechanisms involving the interaction of cancer cells or SARS-CoV2 on the one hand and the coagulation system and endothelial cells on the other hand. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended for hospitalized patients with active cancer and high-risk outpatients with cancer receiving anticancer treatment. Universal thromboprophylaxis with a high prophylactic dose of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) or therapeutic dose in select patients, is currently indicated for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Also, prophylactic anticoagulation is recommended for outpatients with COVID-19 at high risk for thrombosis or disease worsening. However, whether there is an additive risk of thrombosis when a patient with cancer is infected with SARSCoV2 remains unclear. In the current review, we summarize and critically discuss the literature regarding the epidemiology of thrombotic events in patients with cancer and concomitant COVID-19, the thrombotic risk assessment, and the recommendations on thromboprophylaxis for this subgroup of patients. Current data do not support an additive thrombotic risk for patients with cancer and COVID-19. Of note, patients with cancer have less access to intensive care unit care, a setting associated with high thrombotic risk. Based on current evidence, patients with cancer and COVID-19 should be assessed with well-established risk assessment models for medically ill patients and receive thromboprophylaxis, preferentially with LMWH, according to existing recommendations. Prospective trials on well-characterized populations do not exist