Immediate operation versus percutaneous drainage for treatment of appendicular absces

Aim: This study aims to compare the outcomes, morbidity and hospital stay in patients who underwent emergency surgery, and those who underwent percutaneous drainage for treatment of appendicular abscess. Patients and methods: From April 2013 to October 2014, we recruited 40 patients with appendicular abscesses for this study. These patients were randomized into two groups: group 1 (20 patients) for emergency surgery and group 2 (20 patients) for percutaneous drainage. Preoperative data, hospital stay, functional recovery and postoperative complications were analyzed. Results: Functional recovery was 2.2 ± 1 days in group 1 and 1 ± 0 day in group 2. Hospital stay in group 1 was 7.7 ± 3.5 days and in group 2 was 4 ± 1 days. Postoperative complications in group 1 were noted in 8 (40%) patients. No complications were recorded in group 2. Conclusions: Appendicular abscesses may be safely and effectively treated by US-guided percutaneous drainage with high technical and clinical success rates, low incidence of complications and shorter hospital stay

Insights into informal practices of sport leadership in the middle east: the impact of positive and negative wasta

This study aims to explore and understand the impact of one of the informal culture forces on leadership corruption in sport settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 individuals. Board members, presidents, and secretaries general were asked via phone interviews to describe the term wasta, using evidence from non-profit sectors in the Arab Middle East. The results show that when wasta is considered from a positive perspective, it is perceived as a means to solve problems or avoid bureaucracy, whereas it is perceived as corrupt behavior when it is considered from a negative perspective. Practical implications of the findings are discussed, together with limitations and ideas for future research