The prognostic value of the histological shape of tumor negative sentinel nodes in breast cancer

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis is an important predictor of prognosis in breast cancer (BC) patients, guiding treatment decisions. However, patients with the same BC subtype and tumor negative SLN (SLNneg) can have different survival outcomes. We hypothesized that the host anti-tumor immune reaction in SLNneg is important and results in morphometrically measurable changes in SLN size or shape which are related to patient prognosis. Methods: Surface area, circumference, long axis and short axis were histologically measured in 694 SLNneg from 356 cases of invasive BC and 67 ductal carcinoma in situ cases. The area occupied by fat was categorized as less or more than 50%. The long to short axis (L/S) ratio was calculated. The relationship between SLNneg morphometries and clinicopathological variables like tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) within the primary tumor, as well as prognosis at 10 years follow up were analyzed. Results: The mean SLNneg surface area was 78.7mm2, circumference 40.3mm, long axis 13.1mm, short axis 8.2mm and L/S ratio 1.7. Larger surface area, long axis and short axis, including age >55 years were associated with higher body mass index (BMI) and SLN fat over 50% (p<0.003). In invasive BC, a high SLNneg L/S ratio (=1.9) was related to poorer disease-free (HR=1.805, 95%CI 1.182-2.755, p=0.006) and overall (HR=2.389, 95%CI 1.481-3.851, p<0.001) survival. A low SLNneg L/S ratio (<1.9) was associated with high TILs in the primary BC (=10%) (p=0.005). However a high TIL count was not of prognostic relevance. Conclusions: This is the first study to suggest that morphometric characteristics of axillary SLNneg, like L/S ratio, could be used to predict prognosis in patients with SLNneg invasive BC of all subtypes. The association between low L/S ratio and high TILs suggest that SLN shape is related to immunological functioning of the SLN and could be used in addition to TIL evaluation. Regarding the dubious role of TILs in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, SLNneg morphometry to gain information about host immune status could especially be of benefit in this subtype. Further studies are warranted to better understand the underlying biological mechanisms

Systematic review of targeted axillary dissection in node-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy:variation in type of marker and timing of placement

Background: In node-positive (cN+) breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, combining sentinel lymph node biopsy and targeted lymph node excision, that is targeted axillary dissection, increases accuracy. Targeted axillary dissection procedures differ in terms of the targeted lymph node excision technique. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of targeted axillary dissection procedures regarding definitive marker type and timing of placement: before neoadjuvant systemic therapy (1-step procedure) or after neoadjuvant systemic therapy adjacent to a clip placed before the neoadjuvant therapy (2-step procedure). Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched, to 4 July 2023, for RCTs, cohort studies, and case-control studies with at least 25 patients. Studies of targeted lymph node excision only (without sentinel lymph node biopsy), or where intraoperative localization of the targeted lymph node was not attempted, were excluded. For qualitative synthesis, studies were grouped by definitive marker and timing of placement. The targeted lymph node identification rate was reported. Study quality was assessed using a National Institutes of Health quality assessment tool.Results: Of 277 unique records, 51 studies with a total of 4512 patients were included. Six definitive markers were identified: wire, 125I-labelled seed, 99mTc, (electro)magnetic/radiofrequency markers, black ink, and a clip. Fifteen studies evaluated one-step procedures, with the identification rate of the targeted lymph node at surgery varying from 8 of 13 to 47 of 47. Forty-one studies evaluated two-step procedures, with the identification rate of the clipped targeted lymph node on imaging after neoadjuvant systemic therapy varying from 49 to 100%, and the identification rate of the targeted lymph node at surgery from 17 of 24 to 100%. Most studies (40 of 51) were rated as being of fair quality.Conclusion: Various targeted axillary dissection procedures are used in clinical practice. Owing to study heterogeneity, the optimal targeted lymph node excision technique in terms of identification rate and feasibility could not be determined. Two-step procedures are at risk of not identifying the clipped targeted lymph node on imaging after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.</p

MRI-based response patterns during neoadjuvant chemotherapy can predict pathological (complete) response in patients with breast cancer

Contains fulltext : 191061.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access

Correlation Between Pathologic Complete Response in the Breast and Absence of Axillary Lymph Node Metastases After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

Objective:The aim was to investigate whether pathologic complete response (PCR) in the breast is correlated with absence of axillary lymph node metastases at final pathology (ypN0) in patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for different breast cancer subtypes.Background:Pathologic complete response rates have improved on account of more effective systemic treatment regimens. Promising results in feasibility trials with percutaneous image-guided tissue sampling for the identification of breast PCR after NST raise the question whether breast surgery is a redundant procedure. Thereby, the need for axillary surgery should be reconsidered as well.Methods:Patients diagnosed with cT1-3N0-1 breast cancer and treated with NST, followed by surgery between 2010 and 2016, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were compared according to the pa

Extracapsular extension in the positive sentinel lymph node: a marker of poor prognosis in cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients?

Objective: This study aims to evaluate whether extracapsular extension (ECE) in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is associated with involvement of ≥ 4 lymph node metastases at completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and the effect on 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 10-year overall survival (OS). Summary background data: ECE in a SLN is usually a contraindication for omitting completion ALND in cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy and 1–2 positive SLN(s). Methods: All cT1-2N0 breast cancer patients with 1–3 positive SLN(s) who underwent ALND between 2005 and 2008 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between ECE and ≥ 4 lymph node metastases. Five-year DFS and 10-year OS were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. Cox regression analysis was performed to correct for other prognostic factors. Results: A total of 3502 patients were included. Information on ECE was available for 2111 (60.3%) patients, consisting of 741 (35.1%) patients with and 1370 (64.9%) without ECE. The incidence of ≥ 4 lymph node metastases was 116 (15.7%) in the ECE group vs. 80 (5.8%) in the group without ECE (p < 0.001). Five-year DFS rate was 86.4% in the ECE group compared to 88.8% in the group without ECE (p = 0.085). 10-year OS rate was 78.6% compared to 83.0% (p = 0.018), respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that ECE was not an independent prognostic factor for both DFS and OS. Conclusions: ECE was significantly associated with involvement of ≥ 4 lymph node metastases in the completion ALND group. ECE was not an independent prognostic factor for both DFS and OS

Topical Imiquimod Treatment of High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (TOPIC-3): A Nonrandomized Multicenter Study

Topical imiquimod could be an alternative, noninvasive, treatment modality for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). However, evidence is limited, and there are no studies that compared treatment effectiveness and side effects of topical imiquimod cream to standard large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) treatment. A multi-center, nonrandomized controlled trial was performed among women with a histologic diagnosis of CIN 2/3. Women were treated with either vaginal imiquimod (6.25 mg 3 times weekly for 8 to 16 wk) or LLETZ according to their own preference. Successful treatment was defined as the absence of high-grade dysplasia at the first follow-up interval after treatment (at 20 wk for the imiquimod group and at 26 wk for the LLETZ group). Secondary outcome measures were high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) clearance, side effects, and predictive factors for successful imiquimod treatment. Imiquimod treatment was successful in 60% of women who completed imiquimod treatment and 95% of women treated with LLETZ. hrHPV clearance occurred in 69% and 67% in the imiquimod group and LLETZ group, respectively. This study provides further evidence on topical imiquimod cream as a feasible and safe treatment modality for high-grade CIN. Although the effectiveness is considerably lower than LLETZ treatment, imiquimod treatment could prevent initial surgical treatment in over 40% of women and should be offered to a selected population of women who wish to avoid (repeated) surgical treatment of high-grade CIN

Homologous Recombination Deficiency and Cyclin E1 Amplification Are Correlated with Immune Cell Infiltration and Survival in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer

Background: How molecular profiles are associated with tumor microenvironment (TME) in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is incompletely understood. Therefore, we analyzed the TME and molecular profiles of HGSOC and assessed their associations with overall survival (OS). Methods: Patients with advanced-stage HGSOC treated in three Dutch hospitals between 2008–2015 were included. Patient data were collected from medical records. BRCA1/2 mutation, BRCA1 promotor methylation analyses, and copy number variations were used to define molecular profiles. Immune cells were assessed with immunohistochemical staining. Results: 348 patients were categorized as BRCA mutation (BRCAm) (BRCAm or promotor methylation) (30%), non-BRCA mutated HRD (19%), Cyclin E1 (CCNE1)-amplification (13%), non-BRCAmut HRD and CCNE1-amplification (double classifier) (20%), and no specific molecular profile (NSMP) (18%). BRCAm showed highest immune cell densities and CCNE1-amplification lowest. BRCAm showed the most favorable OS (52.5 months), compared to non-BRCAmut HRD (41.0 months), CCNE1-amplification (28.0 months), double classifier (27.8 months), and NSMP (35.4 months). Higher immune cell densities showed a favorable OS compared to lower, also within the profiles. CD8+, CD20+, and CD103+ cells remained associated with OS in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Molecular profiles and TME are associated with OS. TME differs per profile, with higher immune cell densities showing a favorable OS, even within the profiles. HGSOC does not reflect one entity but comprises different entities based on molecular profiles and TME

Author Correction:Pan-cancer image-based detection of clinically actionable genetic alterations (Nature Cancer, (2020), 1, 8, (789-799), 10.1038/s43018-020-0087-6)

In the version of this article initially published, the sample size (n = 794) was incorrect in Fig. 2f and Extended Data Fig. 4a,e; the correct sample size is ‘n = 397’. The sample size (n = 826) was also incorrect in Fig. 2h and Extended Data Fig. 4q,u; the correct sample size is ‘n = 413’. Also, the values in Supplementary Table 2, row ‘TCGA-HNSC’, column ‘Quality OK and tumor on slide’ (424, 424) were incorrect;the correct values are ‘457, 439’. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article

Establishment of the Dutch Nationwide, Interdisciplinary Infrastructure and Biobank for Fundamental and Translational Ovarian Cancer Research: Archipelago of Ovarian Cancer Research

OBJECTIVES: Ovarian cancer has the worst overall survival rate of all gynecologic malignancies. For the majority of patients, the 5-year overall survival rate of less than 50% has hardly improved over the last decades. To improve the outcome of patients with all subtypes of ovarian cancer, large-scale fundamental and translational research is needed. To accommodate these types of ovarian cancer research, we have established a Dutch nationwide, interdisciplinary infrastructure and biobank: the Archipelago of Ovarian Cancer Research (AOCR). The AOCR will facilitate fundamental and translational ovarian cancer research and enhance interdisciplinary, national, and international collaboration.  DESIGN: The AOCR biobank is a prospective ovarian cancer biobank in which biomaterials are collected, processed, and stored in a uniform matter for future (genetic) scientific research. All 19 Dutch hospitals in which ovarian cancer surgery is performed participate and collaborate in the AOCR biobank.  PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Patients of 16 years and older with suspected or diagnosed ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer are recruited for participation. Patients who agree to participate give written informed consent for collection, storage, and issue of their biomaterials for future studies. After inclusion, different blood samples are taken at various predefined time points both before and during treatment. In case of a diagnostic paracentesis or biopsy, the residual biomaterials of these procedures are stored in the biobank. During surgery, primary tumor tissue and, if applicable, tissue from metastatic sites are collected and stored. From each patient, a representative histological hematoxylin and eosin stained slide is digitalized for research purposes, including reassessment by a panel of gynecologic pathologists. Clinical and pathological data are obtained on a per-study basis from Dutch registries. Research proposals for the issue of biomaterials and data are evaluated by both the Archipelago Scientific Committee and the Steering Committee. Researchers using the biomaterials from the AOCR biobank are encouraged to enrich the biobank with data and materials resulting from their analyses and experiments.  LIMITATIONS: The implementation and first 4 years of collection are financed by an infrastructural grant from the Dutch Cancer Society. Therefore, the main limitation is that the costs for sustaining the biobank after the funding period will have to be covered. This coverage will come from incorporation of budget for biobanking in future grant applications and from fees from external researchers and commercial parties using the biomaterials stored in the AOCR biobank. Moreover, we will apply for grants aimed at sustaining and improving research infrastructures and biobanks.  CONCLUSIONS: With the establishment of the Dutch nationwide, interdisciplinary Archipelago of Ovarian Cancer Research infrastructure and biobank, fundamental and translational research on ovarian cancer can be greatly improved. The ultimate aim of this infrastructure is that it will lead to improved diagnostics, treatment, and survival of patients with ovarian cancer