8 research outputs found
BigMouth : development and maintenance of a successful dental data repository
DATA AVAILABILITY : The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the
corresponding author.Few clinical datasets exist in dentistry to conduct secondary research. Hence, a novel dental data repository
called BigMouth was developed, which has grown to include 11 academic institutions contributing Electronic
Health Record data on over 4.5 million patients. The primary purpose for BigMouth is to serve as a high-quality
resource for rapidly conducting oral health-related research. BigMouth allows for assessing the oral health status
of a diverse US patient population; provides rationale and evidence for new oral health care delivery modes;
and embraces the specific oral health research education mission. A data governance framework that encouraged
data sharing while controlling contributed data was initially developed. This transformed over time into a
mature framework, including a fee schedule for data requests and allowing access to researchers from noncontributing
institutions. Adoption of BigMouth helps to foster new collaborations between clinical, epidemiological,
statistical, and informatics experts and provides an additional venue for professional development.The National Library of Medicine.https://academic.oup.com/jamiaam2023Dental Management Science
Caries risk documentation and prevention : eMeasures for dental electronic health records
BACKGROUND: Longitudinal patient level dataavailable in the electronic health record (EHR)allows for
the development, implementation, and validations of dental quality measures (eMeasures).
Objective We report the feasibility and validity of implementing two eMeasures. The
eMeasures determined the proportion of patients receiving a caries risk assessment (eCRA)
and corresponding appropriate risk-based preventative treatments for patients at elevated
risk of caries (appropriateness of care [eAoC]) in two academic institutions and one
accountable care organization, in the 2019 reporting year.
METHODS: Both eMeasures define the numerator and denominator beginning at the patient
level, populationsâ specifications, and validated the automated queries. For eCRA, patients
who completed a comprehensive or periodic oral evaluation formed the denominator, and
patients of any age who received a CRA formed the numerator. The eAoC evaluated the
proportion of patients at elevated caries risk who received the corresponding appropriate
risk-based preventative treatments.
RESULTS: EHR automated queries identified in three sites 269,536 patients who met the inclusion
criteria for receiving a CRA. The overall proportion of patients who received a CRA was 94.4% (eCRA).
In eAoC, patients at elevated caries risk levels (moderate, high, or extreme) received fluoride
preventive treatment ranging from 56 to 93.8%. For patients at high and extreme risk, antimicrobials
were prescribed more frequently site 3 (80.6%) than sites 2 (16.7%) and 1 (2.9%).
CONCLUSION: Patient-level data available in the EHRs can be used to implement process-ofcare dental eCRA and AoC, eAoC measures identify gaps in clinical practice. EHR-based
measures can be useful in improving delivery of evidence-based preventative treatments to
reduce risk, prevent tooth decay, and improve oral health.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.http://www.thieme.com/books-main/clinical-informatics/product/4433-aci-applied-clinical-informaticsDental Management Science
Investigating Potential Correlations between Endodontic Pathology and Cardiovascular Diseases Using Epidemiological and Genetic Approaches
Introduction: Apical periodontitis (AP) and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are chronic conditions triggered by an inflammatory process and sharing similar pathogeneses and molecular players. Previous studies have suggested that AP may perpetuate a systemic inflammation state and, in turn, contribute to CVD. In this study, we investigated the potential association between endodontic pathology and CVD using epidemiological and genetic approaches. Methods: Epidemiologic analysis was performed by querying the medical and dental records of >2 million patients. We retrieved information on positive/negative history for endodontic pathologies and CVDs using diagnostic and treatment codes from a dental schoolâbased and a hospital-based patient electronic health record system. A case-control genetic association study was also performed; 10 single nucleotide polymorphisms in genes identified as strongly associated with CVDs were genotyped in 195 cases w
Assessing the validity of existing dental sealant quality measures.
BackgroundAlthough sealants are highly effective in preventing caries in children, placement rates continue to be low. The authors' goals were to implement and assess the performance of 2 existing sealant quality measures against a manual audit of charts at 4 dental institutions and to identify measurement gaps that may be filled by using data from electronic health records.MethodsThe authors evaluated the performance of 2 quality measures designed for claims-based data: the Dental Quality Alliance (DQA) sealant measure, which includes patients at risk of developing elevated caries, and the Oregon Health Authority (OHA) sealant measure (irrespective of caries risk). The authors adapted and validated these measures at 4 sites: 3 dental schools and 1 large dental accountable care organization.ResultsThe overall modified DQA and modified OHA measure scores in the 6- through 9-year-old age group were 37.0% and 31.6% and in the 10- through 14-year-old age group were 15.8% and 6.6%, respectively. Results from the manual review of charts showed that 67.6% of children who did not receive sealants did not have any teeth to seal because their molars had not yet erupted, had been extracted, had been sealed previously, or had existing caries or restorations.ConclusionsBoth the DQA and OHA measures, which rely mainly on Current Dental Terminology procedure codes, led to underestimation of the care delivered from a practice perspective. Future sealant quality measures should exclude patients whose teeth cannot be sealed.Practical implicationsThis study's results support the suitability of using electronic health record data for assessing the quality of oral health care, particularly for measuring sealant placement in children
Recommended from our members
Tobacco screening and cessation efforts by dental providers: A quality measure evaluation
OBJECTIVES:The purpose of this study was to adapt, test, and evaluate the implementation of a primary care "Preventive care and Screening" meaningful use quality measure for tobacco use, in dental institutions. We determined the percentage of dental patients screened for tobacco use, and the percentage of tobacco users who received cessation counseling. METHODS:We implemented the dental quality measure (DQM), in three dental schools and a large dental accountable care organization. An automated electronic health record (EHR) query identified patients 18 years and older who were screened for tobacco use one or more times within 24 months, and who received cessation counseling intervention if identified as a tobacco user. We evaluated EHR query performance with a manual review of a subsample of charts. RESULTS:Across all four sites, in the reporting calendar year of 2015, a total of 143,675 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study. Within 24 months, including 2014 and 2015 calendar years, percentages of tobacco screening ranged from 79.7 to 99.9 percent, while cessation intervention percentages varied from 1 to 81 percent among sites. By employing DQM research methodology, we identified intervention gaps in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS:We demonstrated the successful implementation of a DQM to evaluate screening rates for tobacco use and cessation intervention. There is substantial variation in the cessation intervention rates across sites, and these results are a call for action for the dental profession to employ tobacco evidence-based cessation strategies to improve oral health and general health outcomes
Recommended from our members
Evaluating quality of dental care among patients with diabetes: Adaptation and testing of a dental quality measure in electronic health records.
BackgroundPatients with diabetes are at increased risk of developing oral complications, and annual dental examinations are an endorsed preventive strategy. The authors evaluated the feasibility and validity of implementing an automated electronic health record (EHR)-based dental quality measure to determine whether patients with diabetes received such evaluations.MethodsThe authors selected a Dental Quality Alliance measure developed for claims data and adapted the specifications for EHRs. Automated queries identified patients with diabetes across 4 dental institutions, and the authors manually reviewed a subsample of charts to evaluate query performance. After assessing the initial EHR measure, the authors defined and tested a revised EHR measure to capture better the oral care received by patients with diabetes.ResultsIn the initial and revised measures, the authors used EHR automated queries to identify 12,960 and 13,221 patients with diabetes, respectively, in the reporting year. Variations in the measure scores across sites were greater with the initial measure (range, 36.4-71.3%) than with the revised measure (range, 78.8-88.1%). The automated query performed well (93% or higher) for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for both measures.ConclusionsThe results suggest that an automated EHR-based query can be used successfully to measure the quality of oral health care delivered to patients with diabetes. The authors also found that using the rich data available in EHRs may help estimate the quality of care better than can relying on claims data.Practical implicationsDetailed clinical patient-level data in dental EHRs may be useful to dentists in evaluating the quality of dental care provided to patients with diabetes
Measuring sealant placement in children at the dental practice level.
BACKGROUND: Although sealants are an established and recommended caries-preventive treatment, many children still fail to receive them. In addition, research has shown that existing measures underestimate care by overlooking the sealable potential of teeth before evaluating care. To address this, the authors designed and evaluated 3 novel dental electronic health record-based clinical quality measures that evaluate sealant care only after assessing the sealable potential of teeth. METHODS: Measure I recorded the proportion of patients with sealable teeth who received sealants. Measure II recorded the proportion of patients who had at least 1 of their sealable teeth sealed. Measure III recorded the proportion of patients who received sealant on all of their sealable teeth. RESULTS: On average, 48.1% of 6- through 9-year-old children received 1 or more sealants compared with 32.4% of 10- through 14-year-olds (measure I). The average measure score decreased for patients who received sealants for at least 1 of their sealable teeth (measure II) (43.2% for 6- through 9-year-olds and 28.4% for 10- through 14-year-olds). Fewer children received sealants on all eligible teeth (measure III) (35.5% of 6- through 9-year-olds and 21% of 10- through 14-year-olds received sealant on all eligible teeth). Among the 48.5% who were at elevated caries risk, the sealant rates were higher across all 3 measures. CONCLUSIONS: A valid and actionable practice-based sealant electronic measure that evaluates sealant treatment among the eligible population, both at the patient level and the tooth level, has been developed. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The measure developed in this work provides practices with patient-centered and actionable sealant quality measures that aim to improve oral health outcomes
Assessing the completeness of periodontal disease documentation in the EHR : a first step in measuring the quality of care
BACKGROUND : Our objective was to measure the proportion of patients for which comprehensive periodontal charting,
periodontal disease risk factors (diabetes status, tobacco use, and oral home care compliance), and periodontal
diagnoses were documented in the electronic health record (EHR). We developed an EHR-based quality measure to
assess how well four dental institutions documented periodontal disease-related information. An automated database
script was developed and implemented in the EHR at each institution. The measure was validated by comparing
the findings from the measure with a manual review of charts.
RESULTS : The overall measure scores varied significantly across the four institutions (institution 1 = 20.47%, institution
2 = 0.97%, institution 3 = 22.27% institution 4 = 99.49%, p-value < 0.0001). The largest gaps in documentation
were related to periodontal diagnoses and capturing oral homecare compliance. A random sample of 1224 charts
were manually reviewed and showed excellent validity when compared with the data generated from the EHR-based
measure (Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, and NPV > 80%).
CONCLUSION : Our results demonstrate the feasibility of developing automated data extraction scripts using structured
data from EHRs, and successfully implementing these to identify and measure the periodontal documentation completeness
within and across different dental institutions.National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research of the National Institutes of Healthhttps://bmcoralhealth.biomedcentral.comam2022Dental Management Science