4 research outputs found
Purely ropivacaine-based TEA vs single TAP block in pain management after elective laparoscopic colon surgery within an upgraded institutional ERAS program
Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).Background: The aim of this study was to compare thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) with transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in post-operative pain management after laparoscopic colon surgery. Methods: One hundred thirty-six patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection randomly received either TEA or TAP with ropivacaine only. The primary endpoint was opioid requirement up to 48 h postoperatively. Intensity of pain, time to onset of bowel function, time to mobilization, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and patients’ satisfaction with pain management were also assessed. Results: We observed a significant decrease in opioid consumption on the day of surgery with TEA compared with TAP block (30 mg vs 14 mg, p < 0.001). On the first two postoperative days (POD), the balance shifted to opioid consumption being smaller in the TAP group: on POD 1 (15.2 mg vs 10.6 mg; p = 0.086) and on POD 2 (9.2 mg vs 4.6 mg; p = 0.021). There were no differences in postoperative nausea/vomiting or time to first postoperative bowel movement between the groups. No direct blockade-related complications were observed and the length of stay was similar between TEA and TAP groups. Conclusion: TEA is more efficient for acute postoperative pain than TAP block on day of surgery, but not on the first two PODs. No differences in pain management-related complications were detected.Peer reviewe
Antinociception by Spinal and Systemic Oxycodone: Why Does the Route Make a Difference?
Background
The pharmacology of oxycodone is poorly understood despite its growing clinical use. The discrepancy between its good clinical effectiveness after systemic administration and the loss of potency after spinal administration led the authors to study the pharmacodynamic effects of oxycodone and its metabolites using in vivo and in vitro models in rats.
Methods
Male Sprague-Dawley rats were used in hot-plate, tail-flick, and paw-pressure tests to study the antinociceptive properties of morphine, oxycodone, and its metabolites oxymorphone and noroxycodone. Mu-opioid receptor agonist-stimulated GTPgamma[S] autoradiography was used to study G-protein activation induced by morphine, oxycodone, and oxymorphone in the rat brain and spinal cord. Spontaneous locomotor activity was measured to assess possible sedation or motor dysfunction. Naloxone and the selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist nor-binaltorphimine were used to study the opioid receptor selectivity of the drugs.
Results
Oxycodone showed lower efficacy and potency to stimulate GTPgamma[S] binding in the spinal cord and periaqueductal gray compared with morphine and oxymorphone. This could relate to the fact that oxycodone produced only weak naloxone-reversible antinociception after intrathecal administration. It also suggests that the metabolites may have a role in oxycodone-induced analgesia in rats. Intrathecal oxymorphone produced strong long-lasting antinociception, whereas noroxycodone produced antinociception with very high doses only. Subcutaneous administration of oxycodone and oxymorphone produced thermal and mechanical antinociception that was reversed by naloxone but not by nor-binaltorphimine. Oxymorphone was more potent than oxycodone, particularly in the hot-plate and paw-pressure tests.
Conclusions
The low intrathecal potency of oxycodone in rats seems be related to its low efficacy and potency to stimulate mu-opioid receptor activation in the spinal cord
Effects of spinally administered P2X receptor agonists and antagonists on the responses of dorsal horn neurones recorded in normal, carrageenan-inflamed and neuropathic rats
1. The function and role of P2X receptors in the spinal transmission of nociception was investigated using the selective P2X receptor agonists, α,β-methylene ATP (α,β-me ATP) and β,γ-methylene-L-ATP (β,γ-me-L-ATP) and the P2X receptor antagonists pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2′,4′-disulphonate (PPADS) and suramin. 2. Intrathecal administration of 5 and 50 μg of β,γ-me-L-ATP produced a significant facilitation of the C-fibre evoked response and a tendency towards increased excitability of the post-discharge, but not Aβ-fibre evoked response of dorsal horn neurones recorded in normal animals. Administration of similar doses of α,β-me ATP did not produce an overall change in the response of the neuronal population. 3. Peripheral administration of 20 μg of these agonists into the paw of the rat evoked firing in the dorsal horn neurones. 4. Intrathecal administration of the antagonists, suramin (50 and 500 μg) and PPADS (5, 50 and 500 μg), to normal animals and to animals with a model of neuropathy induced by spinal nerve ligation did not alter the evoked neuronal responses. In contrast, intrathecal administration of 500 μg of suramin to animals 3 h after the induction of carrageenan inflammation produced a significant inhibition of the C-fibre evoked response of the neurones. Similar inhibitions were also seen following high doses of intrathecal PPADS, although this did not reach significance. 5. These results suggest that spinal P2X receptors may play a role in the modulation of spinal nociceptive transmission following the development of inflammation, but that these receptors play at most a minor role in spinal nociceptive processing in normal and neuropathic animals