24 research outputs found
Conceptual approach to the classification and certifi cation of robots and complex automated information systems
Introduction.The development and spread of robots, artifi cial intelligence systems and complex automated information systems are
associated with the problem of causing harm by their decisions and actions, as well as the problem of legal liability for this harm. Theoretical
analysis. One of the main functions of legal liability is general and private prevention. When applied to robots, it requires them to be reprogrammed, retrained, or eliminated. Thus, the issue of the possibility, forms and conditions of their existence is directly related to the problem
of legal responsibility of autonomous and sometimes unpredictable software and hardware mechanisms. A systemic legal structure aimed at
ensuring safety and predictability in the creation and operation of robots can be built on the basis of a classifying standard, and each class will
be associated with certain forms and models of responsibility. Empirical analysis.The basis of the legal classifi cation of robots and complex automated information systems will be the threats associated with causing harm as a result of their spontaneous actions and decisions, correlated
with the forms of legal liability. The following threats can be identifi ed: causing the death of a person; unlawful change in the legal status of the
subject; causing material harm; violation of the personal non-property rights of a person; information or other property of the owner (user),
not related to causing harm to third parties; the threat of illegal behavior of robots. Results. The authors propose a classifi cation of robots and
complex automated systems, as well as approaches to legal liability and security for each class, and indicate directions for promising development
of legal and technical standards necessary to ensure this classifi cation and certifi cation
ΠΡΠ΄ΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ
The article deals with challenges and prospects of implementation of the Statistical Data and Metadata eXchange (SDMX) standard and using it in the international sharing of statistical data and metadata. The authors identified potential areas where this standard can be used, described a mechanism for data and metadata sharing according to SDMX standard. Major issues classified into three groups - general, statistical, information technology - were outlined by applying both domestic and foreign experience of implementation of the standard. These issues may arise at the national level (if the standard is implemented domestically), at the international level (when the standard is applied by international organizations), and at the national-international level (if the information is exchanged between national statistical data providers and international organizations). General issues arise at the regulatory level and are associated with establishing boundaries of responsibility of counterpart organizations at all three levels of interaction, as well as in terms of increasing the capacity to apply the SDMX standard. Issues of statistical nature are most often encountered due to the sharing of large amounts of data and metadata related to various thematic areas of statistics; there should be a unified structure of data and metadata generation and transmission. With the development of information sharing, arise challenges and issues associated with continuous monitoring and expanding SDMX code lists. At the same time, there is a lack of a universal data structure at the international level and, as a result, it is difficult to understand and apply at the national level the existing data structures developed by international organizations. Challenges of information technology are related to creating an IT infrastructure for data and metadata sharing using the SDMX standard. The IT infrastructure (depending on the participant status) includes the following elements: tools for the receiving organizations, tools for sending organization and the infrastructure for the IT professionals. For each of the outlined issues, the authors formulated some practical recommendations based on the complexity principle as applied to the implementation of the international SDMX standard for the exchange of data and metadata.Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΠΌ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ° ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ (SDMX) ΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ°. ΠΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ°, ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π½ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π² ΡΠΎΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠΎΠΌ SDMX. ΠΠ° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π° ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ° Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ° Π²ΡΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π½Π° ΡΡΠΈ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ: ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΈΠ΅, ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅, ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ-ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅. ΠΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ½ΡΡΡ Π½Π° Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ (ΠΏΡΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ° Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Ρ), Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ (ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ° Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ) ΠΈ Π½Π° Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ (ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ). ΠΠ±ΡΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΡ Π½Π° Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ ΠΈ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Ρ Ρ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ-ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ°Π³Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΡΡΡ
ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π²Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Π² ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ° SDMX. ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠΎ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ
Π°ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠ΅ΡΠ° Π²ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π΅ ΠΎΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
, ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡ ΠΊ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΡΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ, ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ° ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π΄Π°ΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΡ
Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Π° Π±ΡΡΡ ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π°. Π‘ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π²ΠΎΠ·Π½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π° ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠΏΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠ² ΠΊΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ², ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ
Π² ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ΅ SDMX; ΠΏΡΠΈ ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΡΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π½Π° ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ ΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅, ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π½Π° Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
, ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ. ΠΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎ-ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΡΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½Ρ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΎΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΠ’-ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ° SDMX. ΠΠ’-ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ° Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅Ρ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΠ° ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ°: ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ, Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡΠ΅ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ, ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΡΡΠΈΡ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠ³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ° Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΠ’-ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΡΠΎΠ². ΠΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΆΠ΄ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΄Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΠΏΠ° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΊ Π²Π½Π΅Π΄ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½Π΄Π°ΡΡΠ° ΠΎΠ±ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠ°Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ SDMX
Herd Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 among the Population in Saint-Petersburg during the COVID-19 Epidemic
The first case of COVID-19 was diagnosed in St. Petersburg on March 2, 2020; the period of increase inΒ the incidence lasted for 10 weeks, the maximum rates were recorded in mid-May, and subsequently there was a statisticallyΒ significant decrease in the incidence.Objective: to determine the level and structure of community immunity toΒ SARS-CoV-2 among the population of St. Petersburg during the period of intensive spread of COVID-19.MaterialsΒ and methods. Selection of volunteers for the study was carried out through interviewing and randomization. The exclusionΒ criterion was active COVID-19 infection at the time of the survey. 2713 people aged 1 to 70 years and above wereΒ examined for the presence of specific antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. Antibodies were detected by enzyme immunoassay.Results and discussion. Studies have shown that in St. Petersburg, in the active phase of COVID-19 epidemic, thereΒ was a moderate seroprevalence to SARS-CoV-2, which amounted to 26 %, against the background of a high frequencyΒ (84.5 %) of asymptomatic infection in seropositive individuals who did not have a history of COVID-19 disease, positiveΒ PCR result and ARI symptoms on the day of examination. The maximum indicators of herd immunity were establishedΒ in children 1β6 years old (31.1 %), 7β13 years old (37.7 %) and people over 70 years old (30.4 %). Differences in theΒ level of seroprevalence in the age groups of 18β49 years are statistically significant. The highest level of seroprevalenceΒ was found among the unemployed (29.7 %), healthcare workers (27.1 %), education sector (26.4 %) and business sectorΒ personnel (25 %). In convalescents, COVID-19 antibodies are produced in 75 % of cases. In individuals with positiveΒ result of PCR analysis carried out earlier, antibodies are detected in 70 % of the cases. The results of the study of herdΒ immunity to SARS-CoV-2 are essential to forecast the development of the epidemiological situation, as well as to planΒ measures for specific and non-specific prevention of COVID-19
Reagentless Polyol Detection by Conductivity Increase in the Course of Self-Doping of Boronate-Substituted Polyaniline
We report on the novel reagentless
and label-free detection principle
based on electroactive (conducting) polymers considering sensors for
polyols, particularly, saccharides and hydroxy acids. Unlike the majority
of impedimetric and conductometric (bio)Βsensors, which specific and
unspecific signals are directed in the same way (resistance increase),
making doubtful their real applications, the response of the reported
system results in resistance decrease, which is directed oppositely
to the background. The mechanism of the resistance decrease is the
polyaniline self-doping, i.e., as an alternative to proton doping,
an appearance of the negatively charged aromatic ring substituents
in polymer chain. Negative charge βfreezingβ at the
boron atom is indeed a result of complex formation with di- and polyols,
specific binding. Changes in Raman spectra of boronate-substituted
polyaniline after addition of glucose are similar to those caused
by proton doping of the polymer. Thermodynamic data on interaction
of the electropolymerized 3-aminophenylboronic acid with saccharides
and hydroxy acids also confirm that the observed resistance decrease
is due to polymer interaction with polyols. The first reported conductivity
increase as a specific signal opens new horizons for reagentless affinity
sensors, allowing the discrimination of specific affinity bindings
from nonspecific interactions