Duplication of the great saphenous vein: A definition problem and implications for therapy

BACKGROUND: In the literature there is a range from 1% to 20% of duplication (up to 20%) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) reported, because there is a lack of an accurate definition of the GSV and objective parameters for an anatomical identification. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of true duplications of the GSV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature, a retrospective analysis of duplex examinations, and a prospective study of duplex examinations to investigate the frequency of true duplications of the GSV. RESULTS: In the literature review, a great variety of definitions is used for duplication of the GSV. Before the consensus of the Union International de Phlébologie (UIP) in 2006, Only in a small number of studies, the definition of the GSV in the saphenous compartment between the fascial blades is mentioned. CONCLUSION: Phlebographic studies have been the criterion standard for the identification of venous anatomy. Now, duplex is regarded as the criterion standard for accurate detection of the veins. True duplication of the GSV is less common than the previous literature has suggested, namely 1.6% to 2%. It is recommended that the duplicated GSV should be treated to avoid an important risk of recurrence of venous insufficiency

Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins

BackgroundMany case series have been published on treatments of varicose veins, but comparative randomized controlled trials remain sparse.ObjectiveTo compare the anatomic success rate, frequency of major complications, and quality-of-life improvement of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), and conventional surgery (CS), after 1-year follow-up.MethodsA total of 240 consecutive patients with primary symptomatic great saphenous vein reflux were randomized to EVLA, UGFS, or CS, consisting of high ligation and short stripping. Primary outcome was anatomic success defined as obliteration or absence of the treated vein on ultrasound examination after 1 year. Secondary outcomes were complications, improvement of the “C” class of the CEAP classification, and improvement of disease-specific (Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire) and general (EuroQol 5) quality-of-life scores.ResultsMore than 80% of the study population was classified as C2 or C3 venous disease. After 1 year, the anatomic success rate was highest after EVLA (88.5%), followed by CS (88.2%) and UGFS (72.2%) (P < .001). The complication rate was low and comparable between treatment groups. All groups showed significant (P < .001) improvement of EuroQol 5 and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire scores after therapy; 84.3% of all treated patients showed an improvement of the “C” of the CEAP classification.ConclusionsAfter 1-year follow-up, EVLA is as effective as CS and superior to UGFS according to occlusion on ultrasound duplex. Quality of life improves after treatment in all groups significantly

Heat conduction from the exceedingly hot fiber tip contributes to the endovenous laser ablation of varicose veins

Lower-extremity venous insufficiency is a common condition, associated with considerable health care costs. Endovenous laser ablation is increasingly used as therapy, but its mechanism of action is insufficiently understood. Here, direct absorption of the laser light, collapsing steam bubbles and direct fiber-wall contact have all been mentioned as contributing mechanisms. Because fiber tips have reported temperatures of 800-1,300°C during endovenous laser ablation, we sought to assess whether heat conduction from the hot tip could cause irreversible thermal injury to the venous wall. We approximated the hot fiber tip as a sphere with diameter equal to the fiber diameter, having a steady state temperature of 800°C or 1,000°C. We computed venous wall temperatures due to heat conduction from this hot sphere, varying the pullback velocity of the fiber and the diameter of the vein. Venous wall temperatures corresponding to irreversible injury resulted for a 3 mm diameter vein and pullback velocities <3 mm/s but not for 5 mm and 1 mm/s. The highest wall temperature corresponded to the position on the wall closest to the fiber tip, hence it moves longitudinally in parallel with the moving fiber tip. We concluded that heat conduction from the hot fiber tip is a contributing mechanism in endovenous laser ablation