Electrode Fixation with Bone Cement or Stimloc (R) in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: A Comparative Study

AIM: To examine the postoperative outcomes of electrode fixation using bone cement and Stimloc?? in patients with Parkinson???s MATERIAL and METHODS: Between 2016 and 2018, permanent electrode fixation was performed in 30 patients with PD, of which 15 received bone cement and the remaining 15 received Stimloc??. Data regarding preoperative Unified Parkinson???s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III scores, levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) values, surgery duration, and the fixation technique used were recorded. Brain computed tomography was performed for early postoperative evaluation of pneumocephalus and possible hematoma as well as for the determination of migration 1 year postoperatively. UPDRS III scores and LEDD values were re-evaluated 1 year postoperatively; surgery duration, clinical effectiveness, and complication rates were compared between the two fixation techniques. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in application time was observed between the two techniques (bone cement: 21 min, Stimloc??: 6 min). After 1 year from surgery, 0.92- and 0.88-mm migrations were observed in the bone cement and Stimloc?? groups, respectively. A significant correlation between migration and the pneumocephalus volume was observed in both groups. No differences were observed between the groups regarding infection, migration, pneumocephalus volume, wound erosion, and CONCLUSION: Stimloc?? is preferred over bone cement for electrode fixation in DBS surgeries as it is associated with shorter application duration; this increases patient comfort and tolerance during awake surgery. Clinical efficacy and complication rates associated with both techniques are similar

Directional electrodes in deep brain stimulation: results of a survey by the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS)

Introduction Directional Leads (dLeads) represent a new technical tool in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS), and a rapidly growing population of patients receive dLeads. Research question The European Association of Neurosurgical Societies(EANS) functional neurosurgery Task Force on dLeads conducted a survey of DBS specialists in Europe to evaluate their use, applications, advantages, and disadvantages. Material and methods EANS functional neurosurgery and European Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (ESSFN) members were asked to complete an online survey with 50 multiple-choice and open questions on their use of dLeads in clinical practice. Results Forty-nine respondents from 16 countries participated in the survey (n = 38 neurosurgeons, n = 8 neurologists, n = 3 DBS nurses). Five had not used dLeads. All users reported that dLeads provided an advantage (n = 23 minor, n = 21 major). Most surgeons (n = 35) stated that trajectory planning does not differ when implanting dLeads or conventional leads. Most respondents selected dLeads for the ability to optimize stimulation parameters (n = 41). However, the majority (n = 24), regarded time-consuming programming as the main disadvantage of this technology. Innovations that were highly valued by most participants included full 3T MRI compatibility, remote programming, and closed loop technology. Discussion and conclusion Directional leads are widely used by European DBS specialists. Despite challenges with programming time, users report that dLeads have had a positive impact and maintain an optimistic view of future technological advances

Current perspectives on deep brain stimulation for severe neurological and psychiatric disorders

Ersoy Kocabicak,1–3 Yasin Temel,1,2 Anke Höllig,4 Björn Falkenburger,5 Sonny KH Tan2,4 1Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 2Department of Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands; 3Department of Neurosurgery, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey; 4Department of Neurosurgery, 5Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany Abstract: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become a well-accepted therapy to treat movement disorders, including Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor, and dystonia. Long-term follow-up studies have demonstrated sustained improvement in motor symptoms and quality of life. DBS offers the opportunity to selectively modulate the targeted brain regions and related networks. Moreover, stimulation can be adjusted according to individual patients’ demands, and stimulation is reversible. This has led to the introduction of DBS as a treatment for further neurological and psychiatric disorders and many clinical studies investigating the efficacy of stimulating various brain regions in order to alleviate severe neurological or psychiatric disorders including epilepsy, major depression, and obsessive–compulsive disorder. In this review, we provide an overview of accepted and experimental indications for DBS therapy and the corresponding anatomical targets. Keywords: deep brain stimulation, movement disorders, neurological disorders, psychiatric disorders, Parkinson’s diseas

Deep Brain Stimulation of the Globus Pallidus Internus for Secondary Dystonia: Clinical Cases and Systematic Review of the Literature Regarding the Effectiveness of Globus Pallidus Internus versus Subthalamic Nucleus

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a frequently applied therapy in primary dystonia. For secondary dystonia, the effects can be less favorable. We share our long-term findings in 9 patients with severe secondary dystonia and discuss these findings in the light of the literature. METHODS: Patients who had undergone globus pallidus internus (GPi)-DBS for secondary dystonia were included. Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scores, clinical improvement rates, follow-up periods, stim lation parameters and the need for internal pulse generator replacements were analyzed. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles describing GPiDBS and subthalamic nucleus (STN)-DBS only for secondary dystonia cases. Keywords were "dystonia," "deep brain stimulation," "GPi," "dystonia," "deep brain stimulation," and "STN." RESULTS: A total of 9 secondary dystonia patients (5 male, 4 female) had undergone GPi-DBS with microelectrode recording in our units. The mean follow-up period was 29 months. The average BFMDRS score was 58.2 before the surgery, whereas the mean value was 36.5 at the last follow-up of the patients (mean improvement, 39%; minimum, 9%; maximum, 63%). In the literature review, we identified 264 GPi-DBS cases (mean follow-up, 19 months) in 72 different articles about secondary dystonia. The mean BFMDRS improvement rate was 52%. In 146 secondary dystonia cases, reported in 19 articles, STN-DBS was performed. The average follow-up period was 20 months and the improvement in BFMDRS score was 66%. CONCLUSIONS: Although GPi-DBS has favorable longterm efficacy and safety in the treatment of patients with secondary dystonia, STN seems a promising target for stimu lation in patients with secondary dystonia. Further studies including a large number of patients, longer follow-up periods, and more homogenous patients are necessary to establish the optimal target for DBS in the management of secondary dystonias

Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus on the Postoperative Levodopa Response: One Year Follow Up

AIM: To investigate the effect of preoperative levodopa responsiveness to clinical outcomes in the first postoperative year, and to evaluate the changes in the postoperative levodopa responsiveness in patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS). MATERIAL and METHODS: Forty-nine Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients undergoing bilateral DBS of the STN were included in this study. Their clinical motor symptoms were assessed preoperatively by UPDRS Part III score in both OFF and ON medication states. Postoperatively, the assessments were obtained in three consecutive conditions. Preoperatively and postoperatively, the percentage difference between these two scores was evaluated as levodopa response. RESULTS: Mean age was 54.6 +/- 9 years (27-70). Levodopa response significantly decreased postoperatively by 56% a year. Compared with preoperative med on and postoperative stim on / med on scores, the clinical results of the first year were obtained and an improvement of 25% on the UPDRS 3 score was observed. Compared with preoperative levodopa response and clinical outcomes, better clinical results were obtained in patients with higher preoperative levodopa response (p CONCLUSION: In this study, we confirm that the response of L-dopa decreases after DBS of the STN. The reasons for this finding are not clear. However, DBS of the STN allows for the reduction of PD medications and improvement of daily life activities, motor function, motor fluctuations, and dyskinesia

The Alteration of Neurogenesis and Pathological Markers in Alzheimer's Disease After Deep Brain Stimulation

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia that causes disabilities in memory formation and activities of daily living. Unfortunately, pharmacologic treatments have minimal and short-lasting effects on AD. With the increasing aging population, investigations into therapeutic strategies for AD that lead to a delay in disease progression would significantly reduce the global burden of AD. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is considered therapeutic for several conditions, such as movement disorders and some psychiatric diseases. Preclinical and clinical studies that used DBS as a treatment modality demonstrate the safety of DBS in AD and suggest potential memory improvements after surgery. Nevertheless, more studies are needed to understand the therapeutic mechanism of DBS. In this review, we summarize studies on DBS in various targets for AD and discuss DBS-induced changes in neurogenesis and pathological markers in AD

Infections in deep brain stimulation: Shaving versus not shaving

Item does not contain fulltextBackground: To report our experience of infections in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgeries comparing shaving versus no shaving of cranial hair. Nonshaving is strongly preferred by patients due to aesthetic and psychological factors. Methods: This study is a prospective follow-up of the infection rate in 43 nonshaven DBS cases between April 2014 and December 2015 compared to our former infection rate with shaving in our center. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. All patients, except 7 epilepsy patients, received implantation of the electrodes together with the extension cables and internal pulse generator in one session. Results: In 43 nonshaven patients, a total of 81 electrodes were implanted or revised with a mean follow-up of 16 months. One patient (2.32%) developed an infection of the implanted DBS-hardware and was treated with antibiotics. Conclusion: In our experience nonshaving of cranial hair in DBS surgery does not lead to more infections when compared to shaving. We have changed our protocol to nonshaving based on these findings