6 research outputs found

    Breastfeeding, infant formula supplementation, and Autistic Disorder: the results of a parent survey

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Although Autistic Disorder is associated with several congenital conditions, the cause for most cases is unknown. The present study was undertaken to determine whether breastfeeding or the use of infant formula supplemented with docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid is associated with Autistic Disorder. The hypothesis is that breastfeeding and use of infant formula supplemented with docosahexaenoic acid/arachidonic acid are protective for Autistic Disorder. METHODS: This is a case-control study using data from the Autism Internet Research Survey, an online parental survey conducted from February to April 2005 with results for 861 children with Autistic Disorder and 123 control children. The analyses were performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Absence of breastfeeding when compared to breastfeeding for more than six months was significantly associated with an increase in the odds of having autistic disorder when all cases were considered (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.42, 4.35) and after limiting cases to children with regression in development (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01, 3.78). Use of infant formula without docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid supplementation versus exclusive breastfeeding was associated with a significant increase in the odds of autistic disorder when all cases were considered (OR 4.41, 95% CI 1.24, 15.7) and after limiting cases to children with regression in development (OR 12.96, 95% CI 1.27, 132). CONCLUSION: The results of this preliminary study indicate that children who were not breastfed or were fed infant formula without docosahexaenoic acid/arachidonic acid supplementation were significantly more likely to have autistic disorder

    Prostate Cancer Postoperative Nomogram Scores and Obesity

    Get PDF
    Nomograms are tools used in clinical practice to predict cancer outcomes and to help make decisions regarding management of disease. Since its conception, utility of the prostate cancer nomogram has more than tripled. Limited information is available on the relation between the nomograms' predicted probabilities and obesity. The purpose of this study was to examine whether the predictions from a validated postoperative prostate cancer nomogram were associated with obesity.We carried out a cross-sectional analysis of 1220 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) in southern California from 2000 to 2008. Progression-free probabilities (PFPs) were ascertained from the 10-year Kattan postoperative nomogram. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).In the present study, aggressive prostate cancer (Gleason β‰₯7), but not advanced stage, was associated with obesity (pβ€Š=β€Š0.01). After adjusting for age, black race, family history of prostate cancer and current smoking, an inverse association was observed for 10-year progression-free predictions (ORβ€Š=β€Š0.50; 95% CIβ€Š=β€Š0.28–0.90) and positive associations were observed for preoperative PSA levels (ORβ€Š=β€Š1.23; 95% CIβ€Š=β€Š1.01–1.50) and Gleason >7 (ORβ€Š=β€Š1.45; 95% CIβ€Š=β€Š1.11–1.90).Obese RP patients were more likely to have lower PFP values than non-obese patients, suggesting a higher risk of experiencing prostate cancer progression. Identifying men with potentially higher risks due to obesity may improve disease prognosis and treatment decision-making

    Clinical and pathologic tumor characteristics according to obesity.

    No full text
    <p>BMI, body mass index; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; PFP, progression-free probability.</p><p><i>P</i> value based on Ο‡<sup>2</sup> test unless otherwise indicated.</p>†<p>Wilcoxon rank sum test;</p>‑<p>Student's t-test.</p
    corecore