Platelet Responsiveness to Clopidogrel Treatment After Peripheral Endovascular Procedures The PRECLOP Study: Clinical Impact and Optimal Cutoff Value of On-Treatment High Platelet Reactivity

ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the clinical implications and optimal cutoff value of high platelet reactivity (HPR) in patients receiving clopidogrel for peripheral endovascular procedures.BackgroundAs noted in coronary studies, HPR could be related to increased adverse events.MethodsThis prospective trial included patients receiving clopidogrel 75 mg daily, before and after infrainguinal angioplasty or stenting. Platelet inhibition was assessed with the VerifyNow P2Y12 point-of-care test. Primary endpoints were 1-year clinical events rate (composite endpoint of death, major stroke, major amputation, target vessel revascularization, and bypass) according to the P2Y12 reaction units (PRU)-based quartile distribution, the estimation of the optimal PRU cutoff value for predicting clinical outcome, and the identification of independent predictors influencing event-free survival.ResultsIn total, 100 consecutive patients were enrolled. The 1-year cumulative events rate was 4% in the first quartile, 12% in the second, 52% in the third, and 84% in the fourth. Pairwise comparisons demonstrated a significant difference in the composite endpoint between successive quartiles (all p < 0.05 except for the first vs. second quartile). According to receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal cutoff value for the composite endpoint was PRU ≥234 (area under the curve: 0.883; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.811 to 0.954; p < 0.0001; sensitivity: 92.1%; specificity: 84.2%). Cox multivariate regression analysis identified HPR (PRU ≥234) as the only independent predictor of an increased number of adverse events (hazard ratio: 16.9; 95% CI: 5 to 55; p < 0.0001).ConclusionsOn-treatment HPR is associated with markedly increased adverse clinical events in patients undergoing peripheral endovascular procedures. Point-of-care clopidogrel assessment might be useful in individualizing antiplatelet therapy to attain superior clinical results. (High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity Following Peripheral Endovascular Procedures [PRECLOP]; NCT01744613

Starclose SE® hemostasis after 6F direct antegrade superficial femoral artery access distal to the femoral head for peripheral endovascular procedures in obese patients

PURPOSE:Direct superficial femoral artery (SFA) antegrade puncture is a valid alternative to common femoral artery (CFA) access for peripheral vascular interventions. Data investigating vascular closure device (VCD) hemostasis of distant SFA 6F access are limited. We aimed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the Starclose SE® VCD for hemostasis, following direct 6F antegrade SFA access distal to the femoral head.METHODS:This prospective, single-center study included patients who were not suitable for CFA puncture and were scheduled to undergo peripheral endovascular interventions using direct antegrade SFA 6F access, at least 2 cm below the inferior edge of femoral head. Hemostasis was obtained with the Starclose SE® VCD (Abbott Laboratories). Primary endpoints were successful hemostasis rate and periprocedural (30-day) major complication rate. Secondary endpoint was the rate of minor complications. Clinical and Doppler ultrasound follow-up was performed at discharge and at one month.RESULTS:Between September 2014 and August 2015, a total of 30 patients (21 male; 70.0%) with a mean body mass index of 41.2 kg/m2 were enrolled. Mean age was 72±9 years (range, 67–88 years). Most patients suffered from critical limb ischemia (87.1%) and diabetes (61.3%). Calcifications were present in eight cases (26.6%). Reason for direct SFA puncture was obesity (100%). Successful hemostasis was achieved in 100% of the cases. No major complications were noted after one-month follow-up. Minor complications included two <5 cm hematomas (6.6%) not necessitating treatment.CONCLUSION:In this prospective study, Starclose SE® VCD was safe and effective for hemostasis of antegrade direct SFA puncture. Uncomplicated hemostasis was achieved even in cases of puncturing 2 to 7 cm below the inferior edge of the femoral head

Future scenarios and opportunities for interventional radiology in the post COVID-19 era

ABSTRACT Pandemic outbreak has led health systems worldwide into a rapid reorganization in response to coronavirus infections, forcing interventional radiology units to adapt. Interventional procedures have evolved in number, type and setting and have arguably been optimized as a direct consequence of this pandemic; a result that will undoubtedly lead to radical change within the specialty. This paper explores the future of interventional radiology from various perspectives, and forecasts the new opportunities that will be presented, from the adaptation of the interventional radiology staff and angiography suite, to the immunological environment, and through to digital medical education. We analyze the economic impact and the future relationship we can expect with the rest of the medical industry

Risk of Major Amputation Following Application of Paclitaxel Coated Balloons in the Lower Limb Arteries : A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Objective: There have been concerns about the long term safety of paclitaxel coated devices in the lower limbs. A formal systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to examine the long term risk of major amputation using paclitaxel coated balloons in peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Method: This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (ID 227761). A broad bibliographic search was performed for RCTs investigating paclitaxel coated balloons in the peripheral arteries (femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal) for treatment of intermittent claudication or critical limb ischaemia (CLI). The literature search was last updated on 20 February 2021 without any restrictions on publication language, date, or status. Major amputations were analysed with time to event methods employing one and two stage models. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses, combinatorial meta-analysis, and a multivariable dose response meta-analysis to examine presence of a biological gradient were also performed. Results: In all, 21 RCTs with 3 760 lower limbs were analysed (52% intermittent claudication and 48% CLI; median follow up two years). There were 87 major amputations of 2 216 limbs in the paclitaxel arms (4.0% crude risk) compared with 41 major amputations in 1 544 limbs in the control arms (2.7% crude risk). The risk of major amputation was significantly higher for paclitaxel coated balloons with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.66 (95% CI 1.14 - 2.42; p = .008, one stage stratified Cox model). The prediction interval was 95% CI 1.10 - 2.46 (two stage model). The observed amputation risk was consistent for both femoropopliteal (p = .055) and infrapopliteal (p = .055) vessels. Number needed to harm was 35 for CLI. There was good evidence of a significant non-linear dose response relationship with accelerated risk per cumulative paclitaxel dose (chi square model p = .007). There was no evidence of publication bias (p = .80) and no significant statistical heterogeneity between studies (I-2 = 0%, p = .77). Results were stable across sensitivity analyses (different models and subgroups based on anatomy and clinical indication and excluding unpublished trials). There were no influential single trials. Level of certainty in evidence was downrated from high to moderate because of sparse events in some studies. Conclusion: There appears to be heightened risk of major amputation after use of paclitaxel coated balloons in the peripheral arteries. Further investigations are warranted urgently.Peer reviewe