32 research outputs found
Effect estimates (95% confidence intervals) and variance components from linear mixed effects models to predict natural log personal PM<sub>2.5</sub> (216 24-hour exposure measures among 116 subjects).
*<p>Stove by CO interaction effect = −0.00 (−0.22, 0.22).</p
Scatter plot of simultaneous 24-hour personal fine particles (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and personal carbon monoxide (CO).
<p>Lines for each stove type (red for open fire, blue for chimney stove) using equation PM<sub>2.5</sub> = e<sup>(<b>−2.13+0.61*ln(CO) − 0.36*chimney</b>)</sup> estimated from linear mixed effects regression model with natural log-transformed exposures (216 measurements among 116 women).</p
Pollutant Emissions and Energy Efficiency under Controlled Conditions for Household Biomass Cookstoves and Implications for Metrics Useful in Setting International Test Standards
Realistic metrics and methods for testing household biomass
cookstoves
are required to develop standards needed by international policy makers,
donors, and investors. Application of consistent test practices allows
emissions and energy efficiency performance to be benchmarked and
enables meaningful comparisons among traditional and advanced stove
types. In this study, 22 cookstoves burning six fuel types (wood,
charcoal, pellets, corn cobs, rice hulls, and plant oil) at two fuel
moisture levels were examined under laboratory-controlled operating
conditions as outlined in the Water Boiling Test (WBT) protocol, Version
4. Pollutant emissions (carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, methane,
total hydrocarbons, and ultrafine particles) were continuously monitored.
Fine particle mass was measured gravimetrically for each WBT phase.
Additional measurements included cookstove power, energy efficiency,
and fuel use. Emission factors are given on the basis of fuel energy,
cooking energy, fuel mass, time, and cooking task or activity. The
lowest PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions were 74 mg MJ<sub>delivered</sub><sup>–1</sup> from a technologically advanced cookstove compared
with 700–1400 mg MJ<sub>delivered</sub><sup>–1</sup> from the base-case open 3-stone cookfire. The highest thermal efficiency
was 53% compared with 14–15% for the 3-stone cookfire. Based
on these laboratory-controlled test results and observations, recommendations
for developing potentially useful metrics for setting international
standards are suggested
Evaluating the Performance of Household Liquefied Petroleum Gas Cookstoves
Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) cookstoves
are considered to be an
important solution for mitigating household air pollution; however,
their performance has rarely been evaluated. To fill the data and
knowledge gaps in this important area, 89 laboratory tests were conducted
to quantify efficiencies and pollutant emissions from five commercially
available household LPG stoves under different burning conditions.
The mean thermal efficiency (±standard deviation) for the tested
LPG cookstoves was 51 ± 6%, meeting guidelines for the highest
tier level (Tier 4) under the International Organization for Standardization,
International Workshop Agreement 11. Emission factors of CO<sub>2</sub>, CO, THC, CH<sub>4</sub>, and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> on
the basis of useful energy delivered (MJ<sub>d</sub>) were 142 ±
17, 0.77 ± 0.55, 130 ± 196, 5.6 ± 8.2, and 46 ±
9 mg/MJ<sub>d</sub>, respectively. Approximately 90% of the PM<sub>2.5</sub> data were below the detection limit, corresponding to an
emission rate below 0.11 mg/min. For those data above the detection
limit, the average emission factor was 2.4 ± 1.6 mg/MJ<sub>d</sub>, with a mean emission rate of 0.20 ± 0.16 mg/min. Under the
specified gas pressure (2.8 kPa), but with the burner control set
to minimum air flow rate, less complete combustion resulted in a visually
yellow flame, and CO, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, EC, and BC emissions all increased.
LPG cookstoves met guidelines for Tier 4 for both CO and PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions and mostly met the World Health Organization Emission
Rate Targets set to protect human health
Patterns of Stove Usage after Introduction of an Advanced Cookstove: The Long-Term Application of Household Sensors
Household
air pollution generated from solid fuel use for cooking
is one of the leading risk factors for ill-health globally. Deployment
of advanced cookstoves to reduce emissions has been a major focus
of intervention efforts. However, household usage of these stoves
and resulting changes in usage of traditional polluting stoves is
not well characterized. In Palwal District, Haryana, India, we carried
out an intervention utilizing the Philips HD4012 fan-assisted stove,
one of the cleanest biomass stoves available. We placed small, unobtrusive
data-logging iButton thermometers on both the traditional and Philips
stoves to collect continuous data on use patterns in 200 homes over
60 weeks. Intervention stove usage declined steadily over time and
stabilized after approximately 200 days; use of the traditional stove
remained relatively constant. We additionally evaluated how well short-duration
usage measures predicted long-term use. Measuring usage over time
of both traditional and intervention stoves provides better understanding
of cooking behaviors and can lead to more precise quantification of
potential exposure reductions and consequent health benefits attributable
to interventions
Left, a traditional ger dwelling. right, houses typical of the peri-urban regions of UB.
<p>(Credit: L. Drew Hill).</p
Estimates of age-specific city-wide population and household number by home type, and estimated household size.
<p>Estimates of age-specific city-wide population and household number by home type, and estimated household size.</p
Population weighted wintertime outdoor PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations.
<p>Whiskers represent 10<sup>th</sup> and 90<sup>th</sup> percentile concentrations.</p
Summary of the assumptions made for emissions sources, by category <sup>1</sup>.
<p>Summary of the assumptions made for emissions sources, by category <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0186834#t001fn001" target="_blank"><sup>1</sup></a>.</p
Estimated burden averted from BAU by measures taken in Pathways 1 and 2 (2014–2024).
<p>Pathway 2 would save more lives than Pathway 1 by more than a factor of 2. Lower and upper bounds on total values are shown as whiskers. Note the greater importance of child ALRI in averted DALYs as compared to averted deaths.</p