Dietary vitamin D2 - a potentially underestimated contributor to vitamin D nutritional status of adults?

It has been suggested that vitamin D2 is not very prevalent in the human food chain. However, data from a number of recent intervention studies suggest that the majority of subjects had measurable serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D2 (25(OH)D2) concentrations. Serum 25(OH)D2, unlike 25(OH)D3, is not directly influenced by exposure of skin to sun and thus has dietary origins; however, quantifying dietary vitamin D2 is difficult due to the limitations of food composition data. Therefore, the present study aimed to characterise serum 25(OH)D2 concentrations in the participants of the National Adult Nutrition Survey (NANS) in Ireland, and to use these serum concentrations to estimate the intake of vitamin D2 using a mathematical modelling approach. Serum 25(OH)D2 concentration was measured by a liquid chromatography–tandem MS method, and information on diet as well as subject characteristics was obtained from the NANS. Of these participants, 78·7 % (n 884) had serum 25(OH)D2 concentrations above the limit of quantification, and the mean, maximum, 10th, 50th (median) and 90th percentile values of serum 25(OH)D2 concentrations were 3·69, 27·6, 1·71, 2·96 and 6·36 nmol/l, respectively. To approximate the intake of vitamin D2 from these serum 25(OH)D2 concentrations, we used recently published data on the relationship between vitamin D intake and the responses of serum 25(OH)D concentrations. The projected 5th to 95th percentile intakes of vitamin D2 for adults were in the range of 0·9–1·2 and 5–6 μg/d, respectively, and the median intake ranged from 1·7 to 2·3 μg/d. In conclusion, the present data demonstrate that 25(OH)D2 concentrations are present in the sera of adults from this nationally representative sample. Vitamin D2 may have an impact on nutritional adequacy at a population level and thus warrants further investigation

Understanding the health-related quality of life and treatment-related side-effects in patients who have been in remission from testicular cancer for 12–24 months

IntroductionDespite the excellent long-term prognosis after treatment for testicular cancer (TCa), therapy-related side effects can be persistent and severe. The aim of this study was to determine the nature and prevalence of post-treatment symptoms and their impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in TCa patients 12 to 24 months after treatment.Materials and methodsCross-sectional, single-center study. All patients who were aged 18 and over, had completed TCa treatment 12–24 months previously and had no evidence of disease recurrence were considered eligible. Participants were stratified into four groups: 1) orchidectomy only; 2) orchidectomy and single dose adjuvant carboplatin; 3) multi-agent induction chemotherapy (CBOP-BEP, BEPx3 or x4, or Epx4 regimens); and 4) post-chemo retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND). Eligible patients were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire and the EORTC QLQ-TC26 questionnaire. We performed a thematic analysis of free-text commentary to evaluate the sensitivity of PROMs used across the treatment groups. Descriptive results were reported. For categorical variables, numbers and percentages were used, and for continuous variables median and IQR values were used.ResultsThe EQ-5D-5L questionnaire showed that patients treated with orchidectomy only and orchidectomy and adjuvant carboplatin experienced only minor physical medium- to long-term side-effects. In contrast, more intensive treatment regimens, such as multi-agent chemotherapy or PC-RPLND, were associated with a higher burden of medium- to long-term side-effects. Similar results were obtained with the EORTC QLQ-TC26 questionnaire.ConclusionsThis study reports the medium- to long-term HRQoL and side effects of TCa treatments, using both EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLQ-TC26 questionnaires, and identifies possibly “unasked” questions from a patient perspective in relation to supportive care needs following TCa treatment. This information will help clinicians to better understand the consequences of treatment and in turn provide better patient counseling before treatment

Serial Transperineal Sector Prostate Biopsies: Impact On Long-Term Erectile Dysfunction

We wanted to determine whether serial transperineal sector prostate biopsies have a long-term effect on erectile dysfunction (ED). A total of 64 men with prostate cancer entered our active surveillance (AS) programme after a transrectal prostate biopsy as well as a confirmatory initial transperineal sector prostate biopsy (TPSBx). A repeat TPSBx was performed 24 months later as part of our active surveillance protocol. The International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) questionnaire assessed ED at baseline prior to each TPSBx, and at one, three, and six months after first and second TPSBx. There was a significant short-term deterioration in erectile function on mean IIEF-5 score between baseline (19.5), when compared to one month (10.5) (P <0.001) and three months (18.7) (P = 0.001) following first TPSBx. This resolved at six month follow-up (19.6) (P = 0.681). Following second TPSBx, there was a deterioration in erectile function between baseline (16.6), compared to one month (7.3), three months (13.8), and six months (15.9) (P <0.05) following second TPSBx. Initial TPSBx caused significant short-term ED, which resolved by six months. Serial TPSBx appears to have an adverse impact on erectile function in men monitored on AS, increasing the risk of long-term ED. This risk should be highlighted and discussed during the consent process

Confirmatory biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer in men considering active surveillance:Reference centre experience

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how accurate a 12-core transrectal biopsy derived low-risk prostate cancer diagnosis is for an active surveillance programme by comparing the histological outcome with that from confirmatory transperineal sector biopsy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The cohort included 166 men diagnosed with low volume Gleason score 3+3 prostate cancer on initial transrectal biopsy who also underwent a confirmatory biopsy. Both biopsy techniques were performed according to standard protocols and samples were taken for histopathology analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed according to disease severity at baseline to determine possible disease parameters of upgrading at confirmatory biopsy. RESULTS: After confirmatory biopsy, 34% demonstrated Gleason score upgrade, out of which 25% were Gleason score 3+4 and 8.5% primary Gleason pattern 4. Results remained consistent for the subgroup analysis and a weak positive association, but not statistically significant, between prostate specific antigen (PSA), age, and percentage of positive cores, and PCa upgrading at confirmatory biopsy was found. CONCLUSION: In our single centre study, we found that one-third of patients had higher Gleason score at confirmatory biopsy. Furthermore 8.5% of these upgraders had a primary Gleason pattern 4. Our results together with previously published evidence highlight the need for the revision of current guidelines in prostate cancer diagnosis for the selection of men for active surveillance