67 research outputs found
Systematic review and meta-analysis of transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease
The increasing prevalence of Alzheimer’s disease poses a considerable socioeconomic
challenge in the years ahead. There are few clinical treatments available
and none capable of halting or slowing the progressive nature of the condition.
Despite decades of experimental research and testing over 300 interventions in
transgenic mouse models of the condition, clinical success has remained elusive.
Deepening our understanding of how such studies have been conducted is likely to
provide insights which could inform future preclinical and clinical research.
Therefore I performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on interventions
tested in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease.
My systematic search was performed by electronically searching for publications
reporting the efficacy of interventions tested in transgenic models of Alzheimer's
disease. Across these publications I extracted data regarding study characteristics
and reported study quality alongside outcome data for pathology (i.e. plaque
burden, amyloid beta species, tau, cellular infiltrates and neurodegeneration) and
neurobehaviour. From these data I calculated estimates of efficacy using random
effects meta-analysis and subsequently investigated the potential impact of study
quality and study characteristics on observed effect size.
My search identified 427 publications, 357 interventions and 55 transgenic models
representing 11, 688 animals and 1774 experiments. There were a number of
principal concerns regarding the dataset: (i) the reported study quality of such
studies was relatively low; less than 1 in 5 publications reported blinded assessment
of outcome or random allocation to group and no studies reported a sample size
calculation, (ii) the depth of data on any individual intervention was relatively poor-only
16 interventions had outcomes described in 5 or more publications and (iii)
publication bias analyses suggested 1 in 5 pathological and 1 in 7 neurobehavioural
experiments remain unpublished. Where I inspected relationships between outcomes, meta-regression identified a
number of notable associations. Changes in amyloid beta 40 were reflective of
changes in amyloid beta 42 (R2 = 0.84, p<0.01) and within the Morris water maze
changes in the ‘training’ acquisition phase could explain 44% of the changes in the
probe ‘test’ phase (p<0.05). Additionally, I identified measures of neurodegeneration
as the best pathological predictors of changes in neurobehaviour (R2 = 0.72, p<0.01).
Collectively this work identifies a number of potential weaknesses within in vivo
modelling of Alzheimer’s disease and demonstrates how the use of empirical data
can inform both preclinical and clinical studies
Co-designing a digital solution using PROMs for people with dementia
PROMs are medical questionnaires used to assess and monitor a patient’s condition and quality of life from their own perspective. Routinely completed by patients during treatment PROMs are an effective way to e measure success, influence future decision making and give patients a voice on the care they receive. While PROMs have seen increased use & success in various healthcare fields, traditional PROMs can be challenging for People with Dementia. One possible way to improve PROMs is the use of the Intelligent Virtual Assistants, devices that allow users to communicate, interact and respond using a variety of different ways such as Text, Voice and Visuals. This approach gives users more ways to communicate their PROMs, collect them instantly and adapt to patients changing need
Results of co-designing a digital solution using patient reported outcome measures for people with dementia
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are tools used to routinely measure subjective outcomes directly from patients during health care or treatment and are an effective way of determining an individual’s changing needs. Digital technologies have increasingly enabled PROMs to be self-reported by patients and collected remotely though this can be a major barrier to People with Dementia (PwD) who often struggle using electronic devices
Enabling people with dementia to self-report data using digital technologies and methods
Remote collection of digital self-reported data is becoming more prevalent in health care practice as services adopt a more person-centred care approach and deliver more care at a distance. Whilst the benefits of collecting such data using digital technologies is increasingly being recognized, This method can be a major barrier to People with Dementia (PwD) who often struggle using electronic devices to self-report. Factors such as platform design, literacy, language proficiency, and physical/mental capability severely impacting digital self-reported data collection especially if such technologies are not designed with this population
Making the most of animal data – improving the prospect of success in pragmatic trials in the neurosciences
Systematic survey of the design, statistical analysis, and reporting of studies published in the 2008 volume of the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Translating experimental findings into clinically effective therapies is one of the major bottlenecks of modern medicine. As this has been particularly true for cerebrovascular research, attention has turned to the quality and validity of experimental cerebrovascular studies. We set out to assess the study design, statistical analyses, and reporting of cerebrovascular research. We assessed all original articles published in the Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism during the year 2008 against a checklist designed to capture the key attributes relating to study design, statistical analyses, and reporting. A total of 156 original publications were included (animal, in vitro, human). Few studies reported a primary research hypothesis, statement of purpose, or measures to safeguard internal validity (such as randomization, blinding, exclusion or inclusion criteria). Many studies lacked sufficient information regarding methods and results to form a reasonable judgment about their validity. In nearly 20% of studies, statistical tests were either not appropriate or information to allow assessment of appropriateness was lacking. This study identifies a number of factors that should be addressed if the quality of research in basic and translational biomedicine is to be improved. We support the widespread implementation of the ARRIVE (Animal Research Reporting In Vivo Experiments) statement for the reporting of experimental studies in biomedicine, for improving training in proper study design and analysis, and that reviewers and editors adopt a more constructively critical approach in the assessment of manuscripts for publication
iSupport for Young Carers:An Adaptation of an e-Health Intervention for Young Dementia Carers
Young dementia carers need to be recognised and supported in their role. They need help to understand the illness, what changes are expected and how it can affect their family member. Many support services, partly due to the COVID pandemic, have moved online and have been shown to be acceptable as they are low cost and reduce access barriers. iSupport is an evidence-informed e-health training programme developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to support adult dementia carers. This paper reports on the co-design of an adapted version of iSupport for young carers. A theoretically driven co-design approach, drawing on the lived experiences of young dementia carers and experts who work with this target group was followed. As a result of this study iSupport for Young Carers was created. It is the first e-health intervention of its kind and aims to support the mental health, knowledge and skills of young dementia carers. In turn, it could improve the quality of the support that service providers can offer, and this can result in increased levels of identification of these young people. The work presented also provides opportunities for other countries and demographic groups to translate and adapt iSupport for Young Carers to their specific cultural context
Efficacy of HIV Postexposure Prophylaxis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nonhuman Primate Studies
Background. The efficacy of antiretrovirals as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) to prevent viral acquisition was demonstrated in nonhuman primate models of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the early 1990s. To complement the evidence base for efficacy of HIV PEP in humans, we systematically reviewed the published data on PEP efficacy across animal studies. Methods. PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched from inception to 31 May 2014 for randomized and nonrandomized studies reporting seroconversions among uninfected animals exposed to HIV or simian immunodeficiency virus, irrespective of route of exposure. Seroconversion risk data were pooled using random-effects models, and associations explored through meta-regression. Results. Twenty-five studies (408 primates) were included for review. The risk of serconversion was 89% lower among animals exposed to PEP compared with those that did not receive PEP (odds ratio, 0.11 [95% confidence interval, .05-.23]). Heterogeneity was low (I2 = 0.0%). In meta-regression, a significant association was found between timing of PEP and seroconversion and the use of tenofovir compared with other drugs. Conclusions. This review provides further evidence of the protective benefit of PEP in preventing HIV acquisition, and the importance of initiating PEP as early as possible following virus exposur
- …