5 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Steering the methanol steam reforming performance of Cu/ZrO2 catalysts by modification of the Cu-ZrO2 interface dimensions resulting from Cu loading variation
On Cu/ZrO2 catalysts, variation of the Cu loading from 0.2 wt% to 80 wt% allows assessing the influence of the Cu-ZrO2 interface on the methanol steam reforming (MSR) performance by steering Cu particle size and morphology, revealing the contribution of potential active sites at the interface and the intrinsic relative contributions of the support and Cu surface fraction. As ZrO2 influences both CO2-selective and selectivity-spoiling MSR reaction channels, disentangling support-specific effects from the special phase-boundary reactivity and the intrinsic Cu° reactivity is possible by our approach. By choosing a broad range of Cu loadings, a comparison of the most extreme cases of strong predominance of bulk-like Cu sites (80 wt% Cu) vs. highly dispersed Cu (0.2 wt%), dominated by interfacial and support reactivity, becomes accessible. Cu (80 wt%)/ZrO2 evolves as the best MSR catalyst by avoiding adverse support effects and providing a high number of support-wetting bulk-like Cu sites
Recommended from our members
Steering the methanol steam reforming performance of Cu/ZrO2 catalysts by modification of the Cu-ZrO2 interface dimensions resulting from Cu loading variation
On Cu/ZrO2 catalysts, variation of the Cu loading from 0.2 wt% to 80 wt% allows assessing the influence of the Cu-ZrO2 interface on the methanol steam reforming (MSR) performance by steering Cu particle size and morphology, revealing the contribution of potential active sites at the interface and the intrinsic relative contributions of the support and Cu surface fraction. As ZrO2 influences both CO2-selective and selectivity-spoiling MSR reaction channels, disentangling support-specific effects from the special phase-boundary reactivity and the intrinsic Cu° reactivity is possible by our approach. By choosing a broad range of Cu loadings, a comparison of the most extreme cases of strong predominance of bulk-like Cu sites (80 wt% Cu) vs. highly dispersed Cu (0.2 wt%), dominated by interfacial and support reactivity, becomes accessible. Cu (80 wt%)/ZrO2 evolves as the best MSR catalyst by avoiding adverse support effects and providing a high number of support-wetting bulk-like Cu sites
Mechanistic insights into the catalytic methanol steam reforming performance of Cu/ZrO<sub>2</sub> catalysts by in situ and operando studies
We assessed the catalytic properties of the Cu/ZrO2 interface in methanol and formaldehyde steam reforming (MSR and FSR) on powder catalysts by using a comparative approach with respect to the influence of the ZrO2 polymorph support structure (monoclinic (m-)ZrO2vs. tetragonal (t-)ZrO2), its synthesis routine and the choice of the precursor material on the CO2 selectivity. Our studies reveal that ZrO2 exhibits a pronounced versatility as a support material and its catalytic properties depend most strongly on its surface properties governed by its synthesis, especially by the choice of the Zr precursor. The way of combining the support with copper introduces an additional layer of complexity, but its influence on the MSR performance is limited to a modification of the conditions provided by the ZrO2 support. Exploiting the comparative approach regarding the Cu-ZrO2 catalysts in FSR and MSR – including the pure support materials – in combination with in situ Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy shows that the CO observed in MSR on Cu/m-ZrO2 can be attributed to a spillover of formaldehyde to the support. Side reactions of m-ZrO2 are suppressed at lower temperatures due to its lack of highly reactive sites, resulting in a CO2-selective MSR performance. In Cu/t-ZrO2, however, the amount of CO is higher and a combination of a formaldehyde spillover to the support and a Cu-ZrO2 phase boundary yielding CO leads to the lower CO2 selectivity of these samples. An elevated number of defects and reactive Lewis acidic and Brønsted basic centers of t-ZrO2 explains this increased activity towards side reactions in contrast to Cu/m-ZrO2 catalysts