254 research outputs found
Exhaled carbon monoxide in asthmatics: a meta-analysis
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The non-invasive assessment of airway inflammation is potentially advantageous in asthma management. Exhaled carbon monoxide (eCO) measurement is cheap and has been proposed to reflect airway inflammation and oxidative stress but current data are conflicting. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine whether eCO is elevated in asthmatics, is regulated by steroid treatment and reflects disease severity and control.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A systematic search for English language articles published between 1997 and 2009 was performed using Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. Observational studies comparing eCO in non-smoking asthmatics and healthy subjects or asthmatics before and after steroid treatment were included. Data were independently extracted by two investigators and analyzed to generate weighted mean differences using either a fixed or random effects meta-analysis depending upon the degree of heterogeneity.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The eCO level was significantly higher in asthmatics as compared to healthy subjects and in intermittent asthma as compared to persistent asthma. However, eCO could not distinguish between steroid-treated asthmatics and steroid-free patients nor separate controlled and partly-controlled asthma from uncontrolled asthma in cross-sectional studies. In contrast, eCO was significantly reduced following a course of corticosteroid treatment.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>eCO is elevated in asthmatics but levels only partially reflect disease severity and control. eCO might be a potentially useful non-invasive biomarker of airway inflammation and oxidative stress in nonsmoking asthmatics.</p
Rapid effects of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol fixed combination inhaler on airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction in asthma: a randomised controlled trial
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effects of a recent fixed combination of extrafine beclomethasone dipropionate/formoterol (BDP/F) were investigated using non-invasive markers of inflammation, exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and adenosine monophosphate (AMP) provocative challenge. The aim was to assess the onset of the anti-inflammatory action of low and high doses and evaluate the suitability of non-invasive assessments to demonstrate dose response.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Steroid naïve adult out-patients with mild asthma, sensitive to AMP with baseline exhaled NO > 25 parts per billion entered a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-way, cross-over study. Patients were randomised to low dose (1 actuation) or high dose (4 actuations) extrafine BDP/F 100/6 μg, or placebo administered twice daily on Days 1 and 2 and once in the morning on Day 3 of each period. Exhaled NO was measured pre-dose on Day 1, then 2 and 4 hours post-administration on Day 3. The AMP challenge was performed 4 hours post-administration on Day 3 and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>, L) was measured from 0 to 4 hours post-dose on Day 1. Endpoints were NO at 2 and 4 hours, AMP challenge at 4 hours after the fifth dose on Day 3 and FEV<sub>1 </sub>area under the curve from 0 to 4 h post-dose on Day 1. Analysis of covariance was performed for NO and FEV<sub>1 </sub>and analysis of variance for AMP challenge.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Eighteen patients were randomised and completed the study. Exhaled NO was significantly lower for both doses of extrafine BDP/F versus placebo at 2 and 4 hours (high dose LS mean difference: -22.5 ppb, p < 0.0001 and -20.5 ppb, p < 0.0001; low dose: -14.1 ppb, p = 0.0006 and -12.1 ppb, p = 0.0043) with a significant dose response (p = 0.0342 and p = 0.0423). Likewise, AMP challenge revealed statistically significant differences between both doses of extrafine BDP/F and placebo (high dose LS mean difference: 4.8 mg/mL, p < 0.0001; low dose: 3.7 mg/mL, p < 0.0001), and a significant dose response (p = 0.0185). FEV<sub>1 </sub>was significantly improved versus placebo for both doses (high dose LS mean difference: 0.2 L, p = 0.0001; low dose: 0.2 L p = 0.0001), but without a significant dose response.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The fixed combination inhaler of extrafine BDP/F has early dose-dependent anti-inflammatory effects with a rapid onset of bronchodilatation in mild asthmatic patients.</p> <p>Trial Registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov: <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01343745">NCT01343745</a></p
Reference values for exhaled nitric oxide (reveno) study
BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FE(NO)) as a biomarker of airways inflammation, there are no published papers describing normal FE(NO )values in a large group of healthy adults. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish adult FE(NO )reference values according to the international guidelines. METHODS: FE(NO )was measured in 204 healthy, non-smoking adults with normal spirometry values using the on-line single-breath technique, and the results were analysed chemiluminescently. RESULTS: The main result of the study was the significant difference in FE(NO )values between men and women, thus indicating that gender-based reference FE(NO )values are necessary. The FE(NO )levels obtained at expiratory flows of 50 ml/s ranged from 2.6 to 28.8 ppb in men, and from 1.6 to 21.5 ppb in women. CONCLUSION: We propose reference FE(NO )values for healthy adult men and women that could be used for clinical and research purposes
Reproducibility of exhaled nitric oxide in smokers and non-smokers: relevance for longitudinal studies
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Currently, there is much interest in measuring fractional exhaled nitric oxide (<b>FE<sub>NO</sub></b>) in populations. We evaluated the reproducibility of <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>in healthy subjects and determined the number of subjects necessary to carry out a longitudinal survey of <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>in a population containing smokers and non-smokers, based on the assessed reproducibility.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The reproducibility of <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>was examined in 18 healthy smokers and 21 non-smokers. <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>was assessed once at 9 AM on five consecutive days; in the last day this measurement was repeated at 2 PM. Respiratory symptoms and medical history were assessed by questionnaire. The within- and between-session repeatability of <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>and log-transformed <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>was described. The power of a longitudinal study based on a relative increase in <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>was estimated using a bilateral t-test of the log-transformed <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>using the between-session variance of the assay.</p> <p>Results</p> <p><b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>measurements were highly reproducible throughout the study. <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>was significantly higher in males than females regardless of smoking status. <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>was positively associated with height (p < 0.001), gender (p < 0.034), smoking (p < 0.0001) and percent FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC (p < 0.001) but not with age (p = 0.987). The between-session standard deviation was roughly constant on the log scale. Assuming the between-session standard deviation is equal to its longitudinal equivalent, either 111 or 29 subjects would be necessary to achieve an 80% power in detecting a 3% or a 10% increase in <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>respectively.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The good reproducibility of <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>is not influenced by gender or smoking habits. In a well controlled, longitudinal study it should allow detecting even small increases in <b>FE<sub>NO </sub></b>with a reasonable population size.</p
Non-invasive measurements of exhaled NO and CO associated with methacholine responses in mice
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Nitric oxide (NO) and carbon monoxide (CO) in exhaled breath are considered obtainable biomarkers of physiologic mechanisms. Therefore, obtaining their measures simply, non-invasively, and repeatedly, is of interest, and was the purpose of the current study.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Expired NO (E<sub>NO</sub>) and CO (E<sub>CO</sub>) were measured non-invasively using a gas micro-analyzer on several strains of mice (C57Bl6, IL-10<sup>-/-</sup>, A/J, MKK3<sup>-/-</sup>, JNK1<sup>-/-</sup>, NOS-2<sup>-/- </sup>and NOS-3<sup>-/-</sup>) with and without allergic airway inflammation (AI) induced by ovalbumin systemic sensitization and aerosol challenge, compared using independent-sample t-tests between groups, and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) within groups over time of inflammation induction. E<sub>NO </sub>and E<sub>CO </sub>were also measured in C57Bl6 and IL-10-/- mice, ages 8–58 weeks old, the relationship of which was determined by regression analysis. S-methionyl-L-thiocitrulline (SMTC), and tin protoporphyrin (SnPP) were used to inhibit neuronal/constitutive NOS-1 and heme-oxygenase, respectively, and alter NO and CO production, respectively, as assessed by paired t-tests. Methacholine-associated airway responses (AR) were measured by the enhanced pause method, with comparisons by repeated measures ANOVA and post-hoc testing.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>E<sub>NO </sub>was significantly elevated in naïve IL-10<sup>-/- </sup>(9–14 ppb) and NOS-2<sup>-/- </sup>(16 ppb) mice as compared to others (average: 5–8 ppb), whereas E<sub>CO </sub>was significantly higher in naïve A/J, NOS-3<sup>-/- </sup>(3–4 ppm), and MKK3<sup>-/- </sup>(4–5 ppm) mice, as compared to others (average: 2.5 ppm). As compared to C57Bl6 mice, AR of IL-10<sup>-/-</sup>, JNK1<sup>-/-</sup>, NOS-2<sup>-/-</sup>, and NOS-3<sup>-/- </sup>mice were decreased, whereas they were greater for A/J and MKK3<sup>-/- </sup>mice. SMTC significantly decreased E<sub>NO </sub>by ~30%, but did not change AR in NOS-2<sup>-/- </sup>mice. SnPP reduced E<sub>CO </sub>in C57Bl6 and IL-10<sup>-/- </sup>mice, and increased AR in NOS-2<sup>-/- </sup>mice. E<sub>NO </sub>decreased as a function of age in IL-10<sup>-/- </sup>mice, remaining unchanged in C57Bl6 mice.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>These results are consistent with the ideas that: 1) E<sub>NO </sub>is associated with mouse strain and knockout differences in NO production and AR, 2) alterations of E<sub>NO </sub>and E<sub>CO </sub>can be measured non-invasively with induction of allergic AI or inhibition of key gas-producing enzymes, and 3) alterations in AR may be dependent on the relative balance of NO and CO in the airway.</p
Performance of a new hand-held device for exhaled nitric oxide measurement in adults and children
BACKGROUND: Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) measurement has been shown to be a valuable tool in the management of patients with asthma. Up to now, most measurements have been done with stationary, chemiluminescence-based NO analysers, which are not suitable for the primary health care setting. A hand-held NO analyser which simplifies the measurement would be of value both in specialized and primary health care. In this study, the performance of a new electrochemical hand-held device for exhaled NO measurements (NIOX MINO) was compared with a standard stationary chemiluminescence unit (NIOX). METHODS: A total of 71 subjects (6–60 years; 36 males), both healthy controls and atopic patients with and without asthma were included. The mean of three approved exhalations (50 ml/s) in each device, and the first approved measurement in the hand-held device, were compared with regard to NO readings (Bland-Altman plots), measurement feasibility (success rate with 6 attempts) and repeatability (intrasubject SD). RESULTS: Success rate was high (≥ 84%) in both devices for both adults and children. The subjects represented a FE(NO )range of 8–147 parts per billion (ppb). When comparing the mean of three measurements (n = 61), the median of the intrasubject difference in exhaled NO for the two devices was -1.2 ppb; thus generally the hand-held device gave slightly higher readings. The Bland-Altman plot shows that the 95% limits of agreement were -9.8 and 8.0 ppb. The intrasubject median difference between the NIOX and the first approved measurement in the NIOX MINO was -2.0 ppb, and limits of agreement were -13.2 and 10.2 ppb. The median repeatability for NIOX and NIOX MINO were 1.1 and 1.2 ppb, respectively. CONCLUSION: The hand-held device (NIOX MINO) and the stationary system (NIOX) are in clinically acceptable agreement both when the mean of three measurements and the first approved measurement (NIOX MINO) is used. The hand-held device shows good repeatability, and it can be used successfully on adults and most children. The new hand-held device will enable the introduction of exhaled NO measurements into the primary health care
Factors affecting exhaled nitric oxide measurements: the effect of sex
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Exhaled nitric oxide (F<sub>E</sub>NO) measurements are used as a surrogate marker for eosinophilic airway inflammation. However, many constitutional and environmental factors affect F<sub>E</sub>NO, making it difficult to devise reference values. Our aim was to evaluate the relative importance of factors affecting F<sub>E</sub>NO in a well characterised adult population.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Data were obtained from 895 members of the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study at age 32. The effects of sex, height, weight, lung function indices, smoking, atopy, asthma and rhinitis on F<sub>E</sub>NO were explored by unadjusted and adjusted linear regression analyses.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The effect of sex on F<sub>E</sub>NO was both statistically and clinically significant, with F<sub>E</sub>NO levels approximately 25% less in females. Overall, current smoking reduced F<sub>E</sub>NO up to 50%, but this effect occurred predominantly in those who smoked on the day of the F<sub>E</sub>NO measurement. Atopy increased F<sub>E</sub>NO by 60%. The sex-related differences in F<sub>E</sub>NO remained significant (p < 0.001) after controlling for all other significant factors affecting F<sub>E</sub>NO.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Even after adjustment, F<sub>E</sub>NO values are significantly different in males and females. The derivation of reference values and the interpretation of F<sub>E</sub>NO in the clinical setting should be stratified by sex. Other common factors such as current smoking and atopy also require to be taken into account.</p
Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis of exhaled leukotriene B(4 )in asthmatic children
BACKGROUND: The role of leukotriene (LT) B(4), a potent inflammatory mediator, in atopic asthmatic and atopic nonasthmatic children is largely unknown. The lack of a gold standard technique for measuring LTB(4 )in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) has hampered its quantitative assessment in this biological fluid. We sought to measure LTB(4 )in EBC in atopic asthmatic children and atopic nonasthmatic children. Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) was measured as an independent marker of airway inflammation. METHODS: Fifteen healthy children, 20 atopic nonasthmatic children, 25 steroid-naïve atopic asthmatic children, and 22 atopic asthmatic children receiving inhaled corticosteroids were studied. The study design was of cross-sectional type. Exhaled LTB(4 )concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) with a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. Exhaled NO was measured by chemiluminescence with a single breath on-line method. LTB(4 )values were expressed as the total amount (in pg) of eicosanoid expired in the 15-minute breath test. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare groups. RESULTS: Compared with healthy children [87.5 (82.5–102.5) pg, median and interquartile range], exhaled LTB(4 )was increased in steroid-naïve atopic asthmatic [255.1 (175.0–314.7) pg, p < 0.001], but not in atopic nonasthmatic children [96.5 (87.3–102.5) pg, p = 0.59)]. Asthmatic children who were receiving inhaled corticosteroids had lower concentrations of exhaled LTB(4 )than steroid-naïve asthmatics [125.0 (25.0–245.0) pg vs 255.1 (175.0–314.7) pg, p < 0.01, respectively]. Exhaled NO was higher in atopic nonasthmatic children [16.2 (13.5–22.4) ppb, p < 0.05] and, to a greater extent, in atopic steroid-naïve asthmatic children [37.0 (31.7–57.6) ppb, p < 0.001] than in healthy children [8.3 (6.1–9.9) ppb]. Compared with steroid-naïve asthmatic children, exhaled NO levels were reduced in asthmatic children who were receiving inhaled corticosteroids [15.9 (11.5–31.7) ppb, p < 0.01]. CONCLUSION: In contrast to exhaled NO concentrations, exhaled LTB(4 )values are selectively elevated in steroid-naïve atopic asthmatic children, but not in atopic nonasthmatic children. Although placebo control studies are warranted, inhaled corticosteroids seem to reduce exhaled LTB(4 )in asthmatic children. LC/MS/MS analysis of exhaled LTB(4 )might provide a non-invasive, sensitive, and quantitative method for airway inflammation assessment in asthmatic children
Inhalation of the Rho-kinase inhibitor Y-27632 reverses allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness after the early and late asthmatic reaction
BACKGROUND: In guinea pigs, we have previously demonstrated that the contribution of Rho-kinase to airway responsiveness in vivo and ex vivo is enhanced after active sensitization with ovalbumin (OA). Using conscious, unrestrained OA-sensitized guina pigs, we now investigated the role of Rho-kinase in the development of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) after the allergen-induced early (EAR) and late asthmatic reaction (LAR) in vivo. METHODS: Histamine and PGF(2α )PC(100)-values (provocation concentrations causing 100% increase in pleural pressure) were assessed before OA-challenge (basal airway responsiveness) and after the OA-induced EAR (5 h after challenge) and LAR (23 h after challenge). Thirty minutes later, saline or the specific Rho-kinase inhibitor Y-27632 (5 mM, nebulizer concentration) were nebulized, after which PC(100)-values were reassessed. RESULTS: In contrast to saline, Y-27632 inhalation significantly decreased the basal responsiveness toward histamine and PGF(2α )before OA-challenge, as indicated by increased PC(100 )-values. Both after the allergen-induced EAR and LAR, AHR to histamine and PGF(2α )was present, which was reversed by Y-27632 inhalation. Moreover, there was an increased effectiveness of Y-27632 to reduce airway responsiveness to histamine and PGF(2α )after the EAR and LAR as compared to pre-challenge conditions. Saline inhalations did not affect histamine or PGF(2α )PC(100)-values at all. Interestingly, under all conditions Y-27632 was significantly more effective in reducing airway responsiveness to PGF(2α )as compared to histamine. Also, there was a clear tendency (P = 0.08) to a more pronounced degree of AHR after the EAR for PGF(2α )than for histamine. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that inhalation of the Rho-kinase inhibitor Y-27632 causes a considerable bronchoprotection to both histamine and PGF(2α). Moreover, the results are indicative of a differential involvement of Rho-kinase in the agonist-induced airway obstruction in vivo. Increased Rho-kinase activity contributes to the allergen-induced AHR to histamine and PGF(2α )after both the EAR and the LAR, which is effectively reversed by inhalation of Y-27632. Therefore, Rho-kinase can be considered as a potential pharmacotherapeutical target in allergic asthma
- …