64 research outputs found
A preservative with bleaching and emulsifying effects
In cosmetic products, additives are substances that aren’t consumed as main ingredients, actually, they are added to these products in the processes of preparation, packaging or storage in order to make them safer, improve their appearance, help to present a stable, attractive and easier to apply the product, without being stricken by environmental conditions [1, 2]. The protection and quality of toiletries or medicine products are important elements in regards to the health of the consumers. Adding preservatives to the formulations helps the cosmetic manufacturer achieve the first objective of products i.e. meeting the requirements of the users while being safe under normal conditions of use. Despite advances in manufacturing conditions (raw materials with exhaustive bacteriological controls and manufacturing in sterile areas), and the containers used (single-dose ampoules, opaque and hermetic bottles which are used for precise amount), there is still the possibility of colonizing cosmetics without a preservative in their composition. Principally adding extra compounds as emulsifier and blanching agent causes more noxious compounds in the products, which should be avoided. Hence, it is desirable that some components of the formulation fulfill this function [3]. In our study, a combination of sodium thiosulfate and Citric acid contains emulsifiers and bleaching substances. When this mixture was added to Azadirachta indica (Neem) gum or Acacia Senegal (Gum Arabic), besides the above-mentioned properties, turned these gums into a thickener and stabilizer agent. This formulation can prevent the spreading of microorganisms. It will be shown from the findings and results that this formula can be used as a preservative agent in the cosmetic and pharmaceutical industry with significant emulsifying and bleach potential. The rare side effect of this additive is mild skin hypersensitivity reaction only in sensitive individuals.
Objective: The purpose of the study was to develop a powerful preservative based on synthetic and naturalingredients, with bleaching and emulsifying effects
Evaluation of Practice Patterns and Outcomes after Implementing SMART for Pancreatic Cancer
Purpose/Objective(s): Stereotactic MRI-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) enables safe dose escalation for locally advanced, borderline resectable, and medically inoperable pancreatic cancer and has shown favorable toxicity and survival outcomes. In late 2018, our institution commissioned SMART for these patients, making it available to all patient referrals. We wanted to review changes in our patient population and differences in clinical outcomes for patients before and after the implementation of SMART.
Materials/Methods: In this IRB approved analysis, we retrospectively reviewed 167 consecutive patients from 2015-2021 with locally advanced, borderline resectable, or medically unresectable pancreatic cancer who were treated with radiation therapy. Chemoradiation (chemoRT) was defined as any 28-30 fraction radiation regimen that included concurrent chemotherapy. SMART was defined as 50 Gy over 5 consecutive daily fractions without concurrent chemotherapy. Baseline patient characteristics were compared between groups. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) and log-rank test. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) were also performed on multiple treatment variables.
Results: Of the patients included, 58 received chemoRT (2015-2018) and 109 received SMART (2018-2021). Median follow up from time of diagnosis for the chemoRT and SMART cohorts were 53.7 months and 29.2 months respectively. Cohorts did not have significant differences in age, gender, race, T or N staging, rates of surgery or surgical margin status. Patients receiving SMART had overall worse performance (p = 0.011) including a lower percentage of PS 0 patients (22.9% vs 44.8%) and a higher percentage of PS 2+ patients (34% vs 15.5%). Similarly, the SMART patients did numerically more often have locally advanced (50% vs 43%) and medically inoperable (26% vs 21%) disease (p = 0.294). The SMART cohort did have longer neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mean of 3.5 months vs 2.3 months in the chemoRT cohort (p = 0.002). There was no OS difference between each group when measured from diagnosis (p=0.79) or from first day of radiation (p=0.2). Median survival in the chemoRT and SMART groups was 18.7 vs 17.4 months from diagnosis. When including only PS 0-1 patients, the median survival in the chemoRT and SMART groups was 18.8 vs 22.3 months (p=0.37). There was also no difference in locoregional control, distant control, or progression free survival using KM. On MVA positive prognostic factors for OS from diagnosis included ECOG \u3c2 (HR 0.54, p=0.015), increasing months of neoadjuvant chemo (HR 0.88, p=0.004) and pancreatectomy (HR 0.14, p \u3c0.001).
Conclusion: Despite the fact that the patient cohort receiving radiation therapy per the SMART approach had poorer performance status compared with chemoRT, OS was not significantly different. The multidisciplinary team was highly supportive of SMART with increased patients being treated
Stereotactic MRI-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Non-metastatic Pancreatic Cancer; Outcomes and Toxicity Analysis for Patients Treated in an Underserved Urban Center
Background: Stereotactic MRI-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) is an emerging technology for treatment of pancreatic cancer patients. Initial results show favorable survival and toxicity. However, data is still sparse overall, and especially in underserved patient populations. The purpose of this study is to review SMART outcomes at our underserved urban academic cancer.
Objectives: Stereotactic MRI-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) is an emerging technology for treatment of pancreatic cancer patients. Initial results show favorable survival and toxicity. However, data is still sparse overall, and especially in underserved patient populations. The purpose of this study is to review SMART outcomes at our underserved urban academic cancer.
Methods: In this IRB approved retrospective chart review we reviewed 98 patients with non-metastatic pancreatic cancer, who completed SMART between November 2018-January 2021. All 98 patients were treated with 50 Gy in 5 daily fractions with adaptive technique as deemed appropriate by treating radiation oncologist. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and both acute and late grade 3+ GI toxicity. OS, PFS, locoregional control and distant control were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. The effect of clinical features on OS was assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. OS and PFS were calculated from completion of radiation. Grade 3+ GI toxicity probably or definitively related to radiation was recorded. All incidences of GI bleeding, regardless of attribution, were also recorded.
Results: Median follow up was 20.9 months from time of diagnosis and 14 months from radiation. 21 (21%) patients were borderline resectable, 42 (43%) locally advanced, 22 (22%) medically inoperable and 13 (13%) resectable. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was given to 86 (88%) patients with a median of 3.5 months of chemotherapy (range 1-12), leaving 11 (12%) patients who did not have systemic chemotherapy. Median overall survival from radiation for the whole group was 15.7 months, and 1-year OS was 58%. There was a statistically significant worsening of overall survival from diagnosis between ECOG 2+ and ECOG 0/1 patients (HR 1.94, 1.05-3.57). 27 (27%) patients went on to have surgical resection with 23 (82%) having R0 resection, and 3 (11%) have an R1 resection. Improved OS was seen in patients with surgical resection (HR 0.06, 0.02-0.23). Acute grade 3+ GI toxicity from radiation was seen in 4 (4%) patients and late toxicity from radiation was seen in 6 (6%) patients. GI bleeding was seen in 16(16%) patients, 10 (62%) of which were on anticoagulation at the time of GI bleed and 5 (19%) of which had surgery. Portal vein complications occurred with 7 (7%) having portal vein thrombosis and 6 (6%) portal vein stenosis.
Conclusions: SMART showed durable responses in pancreatic cancer patients with an acceptable toxicity profile. Attention needs to be paid to the moderate incident of GI bleeding, however further work is necessary to determine if bleeding was due to radiation, surgery, or disease progression. Surgical resection as well as performance status of ECOG 0-1 were associated with improved overall survival. Further follow up will be necessary to determine further durability of treatment response and long-term survival in these patients
Phase I trial of oncolytic adenovirus-mediated cytotoxic and interleukin-12 gene therapy for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer
The safety of oncolytic adenovirus-mediated suicide and interleukin-12 (IL 12) gene therapy was evaluated in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients. In this phase I study, a replication-competent adenovirus (Ad5-yCD/mutTK(SR39) rep-hIL-12) expressing yCD/mutTK(SR39) (yeast cytidine deaminase/mutant S39R HSV-1 thymidine kinase) and human IL-12 (IL 12) was injected into tumors of 12 subjects with metastatic pancreatic cancer (T2N0M1-T4N1M1) at escalating doses (1 × 10(11), 3 × 10(11), or 1 × 10(12) viral particles). Subjects received 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) therapy for 7 days followed by chemotherapy (FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/albumin-bound paclitaxel) starting 21 days after adenovirus injection. The study endpoint was toxicity through day 21. Experimental endpoints included measurements of serum IL 12, interferon gamma (IFNG), and CXCL10 to assess immune system activation. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells and proliferation markers were analyzed by flow cytometry. Twelve patients received Ad5-yCD/mutTK(SR39) rep-hIL-12 and oral 5-FC. Approximately 94% of the 121 adverse events observed were grade 1/2 requiring no medical intervention. Ad5-yCD/mutTK(SR39) rep-hIL-12 DNA was detected in the blood of two patients. Elevated serum IL 12, IFNG, and CXCL10 levels were detected in 42%, 75%, and 92% of subjects, respectively. Analysis of immune cell populations indicated activation after Ad5-yCD/mutTK(SR39) rep-hIL-12 administration. The median survival of patients in the third cohort is 18.1 (range, 3.5-20.0) months. The study maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached
Eco-friendly dyeing of wool and pashmina fabric using Quercus robur L. (fruit cups) dye and Salix alba L. (wood extract) mordant
Study was conducted to investigate the dyeing potential of Quercus robur L. (fruit cups) dye and Salix alba L. (wood extract) mordant on wool and pashmina fabrics. The experiment was conducted keeping in view the environmental safety by using unutilized plant materials and excluding the usage of chemical agents. The dyeing was carried out individually including and excluding mordant adopting different mordanting methods. The parameters like percent absorption, colour coordinates, colour strength (K/S), relative colour strength and colour fastness with regard to washing, light and rubbing were investigated. The results revealed higher percent absorption of mordanted samples than unmordanted samples. Colour coordinates (L*a*b*, Chroma, hue and ?E) of dyed wool and pashmina fabric exhibited satisfactory results. The colour strength (K/S) and relative colour strength of pashmina fabric recorded higher than wool fabric. The fastness properties to washing, light and rubbing showed satisfactory grades including and excluding natural mordant. However, the grades of mordanted samples were found better than unmordanted samples. The dye and mordant in isolation and in combination showed beautiful colours and shades on selected fabrics with satisfactory retention properties, hence can be utilized commercially for coloration of wool and pashmina fabrics
Surgery After Neoadjuvant Stereotactic MRI Guided Adaptive Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer: Multi-institutional Toxicity and Survival Outcomes
Background: Favorable toxicity and survival outcomes after dose escalated stereotactic MR guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) have been recently published for locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are not well understood after ablative radiation therapy, which may temper enthusiasm for offering surgery.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate survival and toxicity in resected pancreas cancer patients after neoadjuvant ablative SMART.
Methods: In this IRB approved analysis, we retrospectively reviewed 33 consecutive patients with resectable, BR, and LA pancreatic cancer based on NCCN 2.2021 staging criteria who were treated at 2 institutions from 2017-2020 with neoadjuvant SMART 50 Gy in 5 fractions on a 0.35T MR Linac and later underwent definitive surgical resection. Overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: Median follow up was 22.4 months from diagnosis and 17.8 months from last day of RT. Most had BR (55%), otherwise initially resectable (33%) or LA (12%) pancreatic cancer. Median duration of induction chemotherapy was 3.5 (SD 1.6) months with most common regimens being FOLFIRINOX (74%), gemcitabine/abraxane (24%) and FOLFOX (3%). Performance status was ECOG 0, 1, 2 in 16 (48.5%), 12 (36.4%), and 5 (15.2%), respectively. Whipple was performed in 27 (82%) of patients, distal pancreatectomy in 4 (12%), and total pancreatectomy in 2 (6%). The median duration from SMART completion to surgery was 6.9 weeks (4.7-44.1). R0 resections were achieved in 28 (84.8%) of patients with the rest being R1, all in BR patients. Vascular resection/reconstruction was performed of the portal vein (PV) in 8 (24.2%) patients, SMV in 4 (12%), SMA in 1 (3%), and common hepatic artery in 2 (6%). Vascular resection/reconstruction was performed in all LA patients. Median OS, 1-year OS, and 2-year OS from diagnosis were 29.6 months, 93.8%, 81.5%, respectively. Median OS from RT was not yet reached; 1-year OS was 90.9%. LRC at 1 and 2 years was 97% and 93%, respectively. Radiation related acute and late grade 3+ gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 2 (6%) and 2 (6%) patients. Post-op mortality at 30 and 90 days was seen 2 (6%) and 3 (9%) of patients with 1 death from GI bleed attributed to surgery and 1 death from hepatic ischemia related to PV resection.
Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting that surgery for pancreas cancer after dose escalated 5-fraction SMART is feasible. Further clarification is needed with respect to ideal patient selection and timing for surgery, the safety of arterial versus venous resection/reconstruction, and histopathologic response after delivery of ablative versus non-ablative radiation dose
Surgery After Neoadjuvant Stereotactic MRI Guided Adaptive Radiation in Pancreatic Cancer: Multi-institutional Toxicity and Survival Outcomes
Background: Favorable toxicity and survival outcomes after dose escalated stereotactic MR guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) have been recently published for locally advanced (LA) and borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic cancer. Perioperative morbidity and mortality are not well understood after ablative radiation therapy, which may temper enthusiasm for offering surgery.
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate survival and toxicity in resected pancreas cancer patients after neoadjuvant ablative SMART.
Methods: In this IRB approved analysis, we retrospectively reviewed 33 consecutive patients with resectable, BR, and LA pancreatic cancer based on NCCN 2.2021 staging criteria who were treated at 2 institutions from 2017-2020 with neoadjuvant SMART 50 Gy in 5 fractions on a 0.35T MR Linac and later underwent definitive surgical resection. Overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: Median follow up was 22.4 months from diagnosis and 17.8 months from last day of RT. Most had BR (55%), otherwise initially resectable (33%) or LA (12%) pancreatic cancer. Median duration of induction chemotherapy was 3.5 (SD 1.6) months with most common regimens being FOLFIRINOX (74%), gemcitabine/abraxane (24%) and FOLFOX (3%). Performance status was ECOG 0, 1, 2 in 16 (48.5%), 12 (36.4%), and 5 (15.2%), respectively. Whipple was performed in 27 (82%) of patients, distal pancreatectomy in 4 (12%), and total pancreatectomy in 2 (6%). The median duration from SMART completion to surgery was 6.9 weeks (4.7-44.1). R0 resections were achieved in 28 (84.8%) of patients with the rest being R1, all in BR patients. Vascular resection/reconstruction was performed of the portal vein (PV) in 8 (24.2%) patients, SMV in 4 (12%), SMA in 1 (3%), and common hepatic artery in 2 (6%). Vascular resection/reconstruction was performed in all LA patients. Median OS, 1-year OS, and 2-year OS from diagnosis were 29.6 months, 93.8%, 81.5%, respectively. Median OS from RT was not yet reached; 1-year OS was 90.9%. LRC at 1 and 2 years was 97% and 93%, respectively. Radiation related acute and late grade 3+ gastrointestinal toxicity was seen in 2 (6%) and 2 (6%) patients. Post-op mortality at 30 and 90 days was seen 2 (6%) and 3 (9%) of patients with 1 death from GI bleed attributed to surgery and 1 death from hepatic ischemia related to PV resection.
Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting that surgery for pancreas cancer after dose escalated 5-fraction SMART is feasible. Further clarification is needed with respect to ideal patient selection and timing for surgery, the safety of arterial versus venous resection/reconstruction, and histopathologic response after delivery of ablative versus non-ablative radiation dose
HEMOPHAGOCYTOSIS SECONDARY TO PHARYNGEAL ABSCESS IN AN IMMUNOCOMPETENT PATIENT (case report)
Background. Hemophagocytosis is a rare, potentially fatal disorder, comprising pancytopenia, liver dysfunction, hepatosplenomegaly, hypertriglyceridemia, and hyperferritinemia presenting as fever, lymphadenopathy and skin rashes.
Objective. To attract the clinicians’ attention to a problem of hemophagocytosis in Critical Care management.
Methods. Hemophagocytosis secondary to pharyngeal abscess in a 58 year old male is being reported.
Results. A 58-year-old immunocompetent patient presenting with hemophagocytosis secondary to pharyngeal abscess, was managed on ventilator and inotropic support, when he developed heathcare-associated urinary tract infection by Escherichia coli and ventilator-associated pneumonia by Acinetobacter baumanii. He developed neutropenic septic shock and multi-organ dysfunction and went through a downhill course leading to demise.
Conclusions. Hemophagocytosis remains a sinister entity in modern intensive care despite astute clinical management. Secondary superinfections with opportunistic multidrug resistant pathogens are difficult to treat. A high index of clinical suspicion, aggressive diagnosis and prompt treatment for hemophagocytosis and polymicrobial opportunistic superinfections with multidrug-resistant healthcare-associated pathogens needs to be addressed upfront
Caveolin-1 is Associated with Tumor Progression and Confers a Multi-Modality Resistance Phenotype in Pancreatic Cancer
Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) is a 21 kDa protein enriched in caveolae, and has been implicated in oncogenic cell transformation, tumorigenesis, and metastasis. We explored roles for Cav-1 in pancreatic cancer (PC) prognostication, tumor progression, resistance to therapy, and whether targeted downregulation could lead to therapeutic sensitization. Cav-1 expression was assessed in cell lines, mouse models, and patient samples, and knocked down in order to compare changes in proliferation, invasion, migration, response to chemotherapy and radiation, and tumor growth. We found Cav-1 is overexpressed in human PC cell lines, mouse models, and human pancreatic tumors, and is associated with worse tumor grade and clinical outcomes. In PC cell lines, disruption/depletion of caveolae/Cav-1 reduces proliferation, colony formation, and invasion. Radiation and chemotherapy up-regulate Cav-1 expression, while Cav-1 depletion induces both chemosensitization and radiosensitization through altered apoptotic and DNA repair signaling. In vivo, Cav-1 depletion significantly attenuates tumor initiation and growth. Finally, Cav-1 depletion leads to altered JAK/STAT, JNK, and Src signaling in PC cells. Together, higher Cav-1 expression is correlated with worse outcomes, is essential for tumor growth and invasion (both in vitro and in vivo), is responsible for promoting resistance to therapies, and may serve as a prognostic/predictive biomarker and target in PC
- …