266 research outputs found

    Unitarity of scattering and edge spin accumulation

    Full text link
    We consider a 2D ballistic and quasi-ballistic structures with spin-orbit-related splitting of the electron spectrum. The ballistic region is attached to the leads with a voltage applied between them. We calculate the edge spin density which arises in the presence of a charge current through the structure. We solve the problem with the use of the method of scattering states and clarify the important role of the unitarity of scattering. In the case of a straight boundary it leads to exact cancellation of long-wavelength oscillations of the spin density. In general, however, the smooth spin oscillations with the spin precession length may arise, as it happens, e.g., for the wiggly boundary. Moreover, we show that the result crucially depends on the form of the spin-orbit Hamiltonian.Comment: 5 pages, 3 figures. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1007.113

    Giant edge spin accumulation in a symmetric quantum well with two subbands

    Full text link
    We have studied the edge spin accumulation in a high mobility two-dimensional electron gas formed in a symmetric well with two subbands. This study is strongly motivated by the recent experiment of Hernandez et al. [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 88}, 161305(R) (2013)] who demonstrated the spin accumulation near the edges of a bilayer symmetric GaAs structure in contrast to no effect in a single-layer configuration. The intrinsic mechanism of the spin-orbit interaction we consider arises from the coupling between two subband states of opposite parities. We obtain a parametrically large magnitude of the edge spin density for the two-subband sample as compared to the usual single-subband structure. We show that the presence of a gap in the system, i.e., the energy separation Δ\Delta between the two subband bottoms, changes drastically the picture of the edge spin accumulation. Thus one can easily proceed from the regime of weak spin accumulation to the regime of strong one by varying the Fermi energy (electron density) and/or Δ\Delta. We estimate that by changing the gap Δ\Delta from zero up to 1÷21\div 2 K, the magnitude of the effect changes by three orders of magnitude. This opens up the possibility for the design of new spintronic devices.Comment: 6 pages, 2 figures, expanded text and added Supplementary Materia

    Spin-flip transitions between Zeeman sublevels in semiconductor quantum dots

    Full text link
    We have studied spin-flip transitions between Zeeman sublevels in GaAs electron quantum dots. Several different mechanisms which originate from spin-orbit coupling are shown to be responsible for such processes. It is shown that spin-lattice relaxation for the electron localized in a quantum dot is much less effective than for the free electron. The spin-flip rates due to several other mechanisms not related to the spin-orbit interaction are also estimated.Comment: RevTex, 7 pages (extended journal version, PRB, in press

    Comment on "Spin relaxation in quantum Hall systems"

    Full text link
    W. Apel and Yu.A. Bychkov have recently considered the spin relaxation in a 2D quantum Hall system for the filling factor close to unity [PRL v.82, 3324 (1999)]. The authors considered only one spin flip mechanism (direct spin-phonon coupling) among several possible spin-orbit related ones and came to the conclusion that the spin relaxation time due to this mechanism is quite short: around 101010^{-10} s at B=10 T (for GaAs). This time is much shorter than the typical time (10510^{-5} s) obtained earlier by D. Frenkel while considering the spin relaxation of 2D electrons in a quantizing magnetic field without the Coulomb interaction and for the same spin-phonon coupling. I show that the authors' conclusion about the value of the spin-flip time is wrong and have deduced the correct time which is by several orders of magnitude longer. I also discuss the admixture mechanism of the spin-orbit interaction.Comment: 1 pag

    Electron spin evolution induced by interaction with nuclei in a quantum dot

    Full text link
    We study the decoherence of a single electron spin in an isolated quantum dot induced by hyperfine interaction with nuclei for times smaller than the nuclear spin relaxation time. The decay is caused by the spatial variation of the electron envelope wave function within the dot, leading to a non-uniform hyperfine coupling AA. We show that the usual treatment of the problem based on the Markovian approximation is impossible because the correlation time for the nuclear magnetic field seen by the electron spin is itself determined by the flip-flop processes. The decay of the electron spin correlation function is not exponential but rather power (inverse logarithm) law-like. For polarized nuclei we find an exact solution and show that the precession amplitude and the decay behavior can be tuned by the magnetic field. The decay time is given by N/A\hbar N/A, where NN is the number of nuclei inside the dot. The amplitude of precession, reached as a result of the decay, is finite. We show that there is a striking difference between the decoherence time for a single dot and the dephasing time for an ensemble of dots.Comment: Revtex, 11 pages, 5 figure

    Hyperfine interaction in a quantum dot: Non-Markovian electron spin dynamics

    Full text link
    We have performed a systematic calculation for the non-Markovian dynamics of a localized electron spin interacting with an environment of nuclear spins via the Fermi contact hyperfine interaction. This work applies to an electron in the s -type orbital ground state of a quantum dot or bound to a donor impurity, and is valid for arbitrary polarization p of the nuclear spin system, and arbitrary nuclear spin I in high magnetic fields. In the limit of p=1 and I=1/2, the Born approximation of our perturbative theory recovers the exact electron spin dynamics. We have found the form of the generalized master equation (GME) for the longitudinal and transverse components of the electron spin to all orders in the electron spin--nuclear spin flip-flop terms. Our perturbative expansion is regular, unlike standard time-dependent perturbation theory, and can be carried-out to higher orders. We show this explicitly with a fourth-order calculation of the longitudinal spin dynamics. In zero magnetic field, the fraction of the electron spin that decays is bounded by the smallness parameter \delta=1/p^{2}N, where N is the number of nuclear spins within the extent of the electron wave function. However, the form of the decay can only be determined in a high magnetic field, much larger than the maximum Overhauser field. In general the electron spin shows rich dynamics, described by a sum of contributions with non-exponential decay, exponential decay, and undamped oscillations. There is an abrupt crossover in the electron spin asymptotics at a critical dimensionality and shape of the electron envelope wave function. We propose a scheme that could be used to measure the non-Markovian dynamics using a standard spin-echo technique, even when the fraction that undergoes non-Markovian dynamics is small.Comment: 22 pages, 8 figure

    Spin-dependent Andreev reflection tunneling through a quantum dot with intradot spin-flip scattering

    Full text link
    We study Andreev reflection (AR) tunneling through a quantum dot (QD) connected to a ferromagnet and a superconductor, in which the intradot spin-flip interaction is included. By using the nonequibrium-Green-function method, the formula of the linear AR conductance is derived at zero temperature. It is found that competition between the intradot spin-flip scattering and the tunneling coupling to the leads dominantes resonant behaviours of the AR conductance versus the gate voltage.A weak spin-flip scattering leads to a single peak resonance.However, with the spin-flip scattering strength increasing, the AR conductance will develop into a double peak resonannce implying a novel structure in the tunneling spectrum of the AR conductance. Besides, the effect of the spin-dependent tunneling couplings, the matching of Fermi velocity, and the spin polarization of the ferromagnet on the AR conductance is eximined in detail.Comment: 14 pages, 4 figure
    corecore