92 research outputs found
Absorption of Marine vs Non-Marine sources of EPA and DHA
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) from algae oil has been incorporated into tissues at a lower level and has been less effective than fish oil (FO) at reducing body fat. Our objective was to determine fecal excretion of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and DHA from different dietary sources. Male mice (n=100) were fed a 12% lipid diet containing soy oil (SO), FO, yeast oil (YO) algae oil (AO), or AO+YO. The AO diet was fed to contain amounts of DHA equal to the FO diet, and the YO diet was fed to contain amounts of EPA equal to the FO diet. To measure absorption, fecal samples were collected over night once per week for 4 weeks, and fatty acid composition was analyzed. Muscle and adipose tissue were collected and analyzed for fatty acid composition. There were no differences in feed intake, body weight, or body fat (P\u3e0.05). FO-fed mice did have heavier livers (P\u3c0.05). AO+YO-fed mice had greater fecal DHA content than AO- and FO-fed mice for the first 3 weeks (P\u3c0.05), and AO-fed mice had greater (P\u3c0.05) fecal DHA content than FO-fed mice in weeks 2-4. FO-fed mice had greater fecal EPA than YO- and AO+YOfed mice at week one (P\u3c0.05). FO- and YO-fed mice had greater fecal EPA at week 1 than at weeks 2-4 (P\u3c0.05). FO-fed mice had the greatest muscle tissue EPA content (P\u3c0.05) at weeks 2 and 4. FO-fed mice had the greatest adipose tissue EPA and DHA content at week 4 (P\u3c0.05). At week 2, adipose tissue of FO-fed mice contained more EPA than adipose tissue of YO-fed mice (P\u3c0.05), and more DHA than adipose tissue of AO-fed mice (P\u3c0.05). Thin layer chromatography was performed and verified that the oil sources were primarily composed of triglycerides. Positional analysis of the oils was performed with a lipase and showed enrichment of DHA in FO at the sn-2 position. In conclusion DHA in FO is more available than in AO, because of the position of DHA on the triglyceride structure, and EPA and DHA from FO is more highly incorporated than from YO or AO
Recommended from our members
Rethinking strategies for blood transfusion in hip fracture patients.
OBJECTIVES: Most patients can tolerate a hemoglobin (Hgb) > 8 g per deciliter. In some cases, however, transfusion will delay physical therapy and hospital discharge. This study aims to review Hgb and transfusion data for a large volume of recent hip fracture patients in order to identify new opportunities for decreasing the length of hospital stay. Our hypotheses are that in some cases, earlier transfusion of more blood will be associated with shorter hospital stays, and that Hgb levels consistently decrease for more than 3 days postoperatively. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Two academic medical centers with Geriatric Fracture Programs. PATIENTS: Data was collected from patients 50 years and older with hip fractures April 2015 and October 2017. INTERVENTION: Operative stabilization of the hip fractures according to standard of care for the fracture type and patient characteristics. Transfusion according to established standards. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Electronic records were retrospectively reviewed for demographic information, Hgb levels, and transfusion events. RESULTS: One thousand fifteen patients with femoral neck or intertrochanteric hip fractures were identified. Eight hundred sixty met the inclusion criteria. The average length of hospital stay was 6.7 days. The mean patient age was 82 years. The average American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.9. The average Hgb level consistently decreased for 5 days postoperatively before beginning to increase on day 6. There was poor consistency between intraoperative Hgb levels and preoperative or postoperative Hgb levels. Three hundred sixty-eight (42.8%) patients were transfused an average of 1.9 (range 1-6) units. One hundred five patients required a transfusion on postoperative day (POD) 1: 72 received only 1 unit of blood: 36 (50%) of the 72 required a second transfusion in the following days, compared to 9 of 33 (27%) who received 2 units on POD 1 (Ļ2ā=ā3.8898; Pā<ā.05). Patients who received transfusions on POD 3 or later had an average length of stay >2.5 days longer than those who received a transfusion earlier (Pā=ā0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support earlier transfusion of more blood. Although in some cases, there is an association between earlier transfusion of more blood and shorter hospital stay, routine transfusion of more blood would incur higher transfusion risks in some patients who would not otherwise meet criteria for transfusion. After hip fracture surgery, the Hgb usually decreases for 5 days and does not begin to increase until POD 6. This information will provide utility in the population health management of hip fracture patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study
Trends in PROMIS Scores in the Early Post-operative Period following Various Lateral Ankle Ligament Reconstructive Techniques
Introduction/Purpose: Lateral ankle ligament injuries are common conditions accounting for 25% of musculoskeletal injuries. When conservative management fails and chronic instability ensues, operative treatment is often sought. Though surgical outcomes are generally good following lateral ankle ligament reconstruction, literature suggests current scoring systems for evaluating outcomes and monitoring progression have deficiencies. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information (PROMIS) scores have recently been established as a method of monitoring patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the trends in post-operative PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression scores in patients undergoing lateral ankle ligament reconstruction
When are the Patients Satisfied with Their Outcome? Correlation of PROMIS Values with Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) Scores in Foot and Ankle Patients
Introduction/Purpose: PROMIS values are being adopted due to ease of use and influence on clinical decision making. Studies support the use of PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and Depression (D) for pre-surgical decision making. Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) is a validated outcome measure commonly used in other areas of medicine and surgery that captures when patientās symptoms reach a daily acceptable level. Knowing what PROMIS scores are associated with a patientās PASS(Yes)/(No) rating would further enhance the use of PROMIS scales. The purpose of this study: 1) association of PROMIS scales with a PASS rating, 2) threshold values of PROMIS PF, PI, D associated with PASS rating, and 3) whether PROMIS, and patient demographics are predictive of a PASS rating
Subtle Cavus Deformities: Is Isolated Lateral Ankle Ligament Reconstruction Enough for Improved Patient-reported Outcomes?
Introduction/Purpose: Lateral ankle ligament injuries are common conditions accounting for 25% of musculoskeletal injuries. Prior reports have found increased risk of failed lateral ankle reconstruction in those with a subtle cavus deformity, and therefore, correcting the deformity is often advocated. However, other studies have been unable to identify subtle cavus deformity as a clear risk factor for recurrent injury. The purpose of this study was to 1) compare PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression scores in patients with subtle cavus deformities to those without deformity who underwent lateral ankle ligament reconstruction, 2) compare PROMIS scores in allograft and modified Brostrom-Gould (BG) reconstructions in those with subtle cavus, and 3) to evaluate for any post-operative complications in those with subtle cavus
Clinical Utilization of Patient Reported Outcome (PROMIS) Scores for Surgical Reconstruction of Posterior Tibialis Tendon Dysfunction
Introduction/Purpose: Previous studies have demonstrated that preoperative Patient Reported Outcome Instrumentation System (PROMIS) scores effectively predict improvement in foot and ankle surgery. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) and Posterior Tibialis Tendon Dysfunction (PTTD) are a common surgical problem, but it is unclear if the specific thresholds for the physical function (PF), pain interference (PI) and depression published previously for all foot and ankle surgeries apply to a specific diagnosis. Furthermore, the interplay of PROMIS scores and clinical variables has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was: 1) to investigate the change in PROMIS scales and radiographic measurements from pre- to postoperative follow up in AAFD/PTTD patients, 2) to determine if preoperative PROMIS scales predict post-surgical improvement, 3) to determine if demographic, clinical variables combined with pre-operative PROMIS scales predict post-surgical improvement
Determining Success or Failure After Foot and Ankle Surgery Using Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) and Patient Reported Outcome Information System (PROMIS)
Background: As the role of generic patient-reported outcomes (PROs) expands, important questions remain about their interpretation. In particular, how the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Instrumentation System (PROMIS) t score values correlate with the patientsā perception of success or failure (S/F) of their surgery is unknown. The purposes of this study were to characterize the association of PROMIS t scores, the patientsā perception of their symptoms (patient acceptable symptom state [PASS]), and determination of S/F after surgery.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study contacted patients after the 4 most common foot and ankle surgeries at a tertiary academic medical center (n = 88). Patient outcome as determined by phone interviews included PASS and patientsā judgment of whether their surgery was a S/F. Assessment also included PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression (D) scales. The association between S/F and PASS outcomes was evaluated by chi-square analysis. A 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) evaluated the ability of PROMIS to discriminate PASS and/or S/F outcomes. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the ability of pre- (n = 63) and postoperative (n = 88) PROMIS scores to predict patient outcomes (S/F and PASS). Finally, the proportion of individuals classified by the identified thresholds were evaluated using chi-square analysis.
Results: There was a strong association between PASS and S/F after surgery (chi-square \u3c0.01). Two-way ANOVA demonstrated that PROMIS t scores discriminate whether patients experienced positive or negative outcome for PASS (P \u3c .001) and S/F (P \u3c .001). The ROC analysis showed significant accuracy (area under the curve \u3e 0.7) for postoperative but not preoperative PROMIS t scores in determining patient outcome for both PASS and S/F. The proportion of patients classified by applying the ROC analysis thresholds using PROMIS varied from 43.0% to 58.8 % for PASS and S/F.
Conclusions: Patients who found their symptoms and activity at a satisfactory level (ie, PASS yes) also considered their surgery a success. However, patients who did not consider their symptoms and activity at a satisfactory level did not consistently consider their surgery a failure. PROMIS t scores for physical function and pain demonstrated the ability to discriminate and accurately predict patient outcome after foot and ankle surgery for 43.0% to 58.8% of participants. These data improve the clinical utility of PROMIS scales by suggesting thresholds for positive and negative patient outcomes independent of other factors.
Level of Evidence: II, prospective comparative series
Is there a Difference in Outcomes between Patients who Received a Double or Triple Arthrodesis for Hindfoot Arthritis?
Introduction/Purpose: Triple arthrodesis has historically been considered the standard of treatment for arthritis of the hindfoot with or without deformity. The complications of this surgery including non-union, malunion, nerve injury, infection and wound healing problems can occur at any of the three joints. Double arthrodesis is capable of producing a similar reduction in degrees of motion and correction of foot deformity but may also cause less patient morbidity in regard to these complications due to one less joint being incorporated into the fusion procedure. What is unknown is the patient reported outcomes, specifically physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) between these two procedures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes for hindfoot deformity using a triple compared to a double arthrodesis
PROMIS Pain Interference Is Superior vs Numeric Pain Rating Scale for Pain Assessment in Foot and Ankle Patients
Background: The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a popular method to assess pain. Recently, the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has been suggested to be more accurate in measuring pain. This study aimed to compare NPRS and PROMIS Pain Interference (PI) scores in a population of foot and ankle patients to determine which method demonstrated a stronger correlation with preoperative and postoperative function, as measured by PROMIS Physical Function (PF).
Methods: Prospective PROMIS PF and PI and NPRS data were obtained for 8 common elective foot and ankle surgical procedures. Data were collected preoperatively and postoperatively at a follow-up visit at least 6 months after surgery. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the relationship among NPRS (0-10) and PROMIS domains (PI, PF) pre- and postoperatively. A total of 500 patients fit our inclusion criteria.
Results: PROMIS PF demonstrated a stronger correlation to PROMIS PI in both the pre- and postoperative settings (preoperative: Ļ = ā0.66; postoperative: Ļ = ā0.69) compared with the NPRS (preoperative: Ļ = ā0.32; postoperative: Ļ = ā0.33). Similar results were found when data were grouped by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code.
Conclusion: PROMIS PI was a superior tool to gauge a patientās preoperative level of pain and functional ability. This information may assist surgeons and patients in setting postoperative functional expectations and pain management.
Level of Evidence: Level II, prognosti
- ā¦