6 research outputs found
Fourier-Transform MS and Closed-Path Multireflection Time-of-Flight MS Using an Electrostatic Linear Ion Trap
An
electrostatic linear ion trap (ELIT) has been configured to
allow for the simultaneous acquisition of mass spectra via Fourier
transform (FT) techniques (frequency measurement) and via time-of-flight
(TOF; time measurement). In the former case, the time-domain image
charge derived from a pick-up electrode in the field-free region of
the ELIT is converted to frequency-domain data via Fourier transformation
(i.e., FT-ELIT MS). In the latter case, the time difference between
ion injection into the ELIT and ion detection after release from the
ELIT using a microchannel plate (MCP) enables the acquisition of multireflection
time-of-flight mass spectra (MR-TOF MS). The ELIT geometry facilitates
the acquisition of both types of data simultaneously because the detection
schemes are independent and do not preclude one another. The two MS
approaches exhibit a degree of complementarity. Resolution increases
much faster with time with the MR-TOF approach, for example, but the
closed-path nature of executing MR-TOF in an ELIT limits both the <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> range and the peak capacity. For this
reason, the FT-ELIT MS approach is most appropriate for wide <i>m</i>/<i>z</i> range applications, whereas MR-TOF
MS can provide advantages in a “zoom-in” mode in which
moderate resolution (<i>M</i>/Δ<i>M</i><sub>fwhm</sub> ≈ 10000) at short analysis times (10 ms) is desirable
Moriarty et al database ear mite treatment study
Data collected from field examinations of island foxes in this study, as well as lab analysis results (histopathology, immunology, mite counts, etc
Otitis and ceruminous gland hyperplasia (CGH) scores in a subset of Island foxes recaptured at t<sub>3</sub>.
<p>Comparison between treated and untreated foxes at t<sub>3</sub>, and between t<sub>0</sub> and t<sub>3</sub> within each group. Number of treated and untreated foxes at t<sub>0</sub> and t<sub>3</sub> (37, 33). Range of values for otitis and CGH shown in parentheses above each bar. Foxes excluded from analyses: three treated and two untreated foxes at t<sub>0</sub>, one treated and untreated fox at t<sub>3</sub> (non-diagnostic biopsy), 18 treated and 22 untreated foxes at t<sub>3</sub> (not recaptured). <sup>a,b</sup> Significant difference (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001). <sup>c, d, e</sup> Significant difference (Friedman test, p ≤ 0.007).</p
Scoring criteria: otoscopic assessment of mites and histopathologic assessment of otitis and ceruminous gland hyperplasia (CGH).
<p>Scoring criteria: otoscopic assessment of mites and histopathologic assessment of otitis and ceruminous gland hyperplasia (CGH).</p
IgG levels in Santa Catalina Island treated/untreated and uninfected/infected foxes, and Santa Cruz Island foxes.
<p>IgG level: a relative quantity of mite-specific antibody (determined by interpolation from a four-point calibration curve, see text for further explanation). Number of treated and untreated foxes (t<sub>0</sub>: 59, 57; t<sub>1</sub>: 38, 42; t<sub>2</sub>: 24, 36 t<sub>3</sub>: 40, 36); number of uninfected and infected foxes (t<sub>0</sub>: 116; t<sub>1</sub>: 31, 49; t<sub>2</sub>: 25, 35 t<sub>3</sub>: 42, 35); number of SCZ foxes (43). Range of values for IgG shown in parentheses above each bar. Foxes excluded from analyses: one untreated/infected fox at t<sub>0</sub> and one treated/uninfected fox at t<sub>1</sub> (missing IgG level). <sup>a, b</sup> Significant difference (Friedman test, p < 0.001). <sup>c</sup> Significant difference between SCZ foxes vs. SCA treated and untreated foxes at all capture events (Mann-Whitney U test, p ≤ 0.01), except for SCA treated foxes at t<sub>3</sub> (p = 0.6). <sup>d, e, f</sup> Significant difference (Mann-Whitney U test, p ≤ 0.01). <sup>g, h</sup> Significant difference (Friedman test, p ≤ 0.004). <sup>i</sup> Significant difference between SCZ foxes vs. SCA infected and uninfected foxes at all capture events (Mann-Whitney U test, p ≤ 0.001), except for SCA uninfected foxes at t<sub>2</sub> (p = 0.1) and t<sub>3</sub> (p = 0.9).</p
Ear mite prevalence and intensity of infection in treated and untreated Island foxes.
<p>Prevalence: number of foxes with mites/total number of foxes. Intensity of infection: median ear mite count. Number of treated and untreated foxes (t<sub>0</sub>: 59, 58; t<sub>1</sub>: 39, 42; t<sub>2</sub>: 24, 36; t<sub>3</sub>: 40, 36). Range of values for mite intensity shown in parentheses above each bar. Foxes excluded from analysis: one untreated fox at t<sub>1</sub> and t<sub>2</sub> (missing mite count), one untreated fox at t<sub>3</sub> (accidentally treated at t<sub>2</sub>). <sup>a, b, c</sup> Significant difference (Pearson’s chi-square test, p < 0.001). <sup>d</sup> Significant difference (McNemar’s chi-square test, p< 0.001). <sup>e, f, g</sup> Significant difference (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001). <sup>h, i</sup> Significant difference (Friedman test, p < 0.001, p = 0.02).</p