Systematic review of methods used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event

addresses: Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, St Luke's Campus, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. [email protected]: PMCID: PMC3528446types: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't© 2012 Warren et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Adverse consequences of medical interventions are a source of concern, but clinical trials may lack power to detect elevated rates of such events, while observational studies have inherent limitations. Meta-analysis allows the combination of individual studies, which can increase power and provide stronger evidence relating to adverse events. However, meta-analysis of adverse events has associated methodological challenges. The aim of this study was to systematically identify and review the methodology used in meta-analyses where a primary outcome is an adverse or unintended event, following a therapeutic intervention

Self-medication of migraine and tension-type headache: summary of the evidence-based recommendations of the Deutsche Migräne und Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (DMKG), the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (DGN), the Österreichische Kopfschmerzgesellschaft (ÖKSG) and the Schweizerische Kopfwehgesellschaft (SKG)

The current evidence-based guideline on self-medication in migraine and tension-type headache of the German, Austrian and Swiss headache societies and the German Society of Neurology is addressed to physicians engaged in primary care as well as pharmacists and patients. The guideline is especially concerned with the description of the methodology used, the selection process of the literature used and which evidence the recommendations are based upon. The following recommendations about self-medication in migraine attacks can be made: The efficacy of the fixed-dose combination of acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid and caffeine and the monotherapies with ibuprofen or naratriptan or acetaminophen or phenazone are scientifically proven and recommended as first-line therapy. None of the substances used in self-medication in migraine prophylaxis can be seen as effective. Concerning the self-medication in tension-type headache, the following therapies can be recommended as first-line therapy: the fixed-dose combination of acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid and caffeine as well as the fixed combination of acetaminophen and caffeine as well as the monotherapies with ibuprofen or acetylsalicylic acid or diclofenac. The four scientific societies hope that this guideline will help to improve the treatment of headaches which largely is initiated by the patients themselves without any consultation with their physicians

Opioid-monoamine interactions in spinal antinociception: evidence for serotonin but not norepinephrine reciprocity

Anatomical and electrophysiological studies have demonstrated that enkephalinergic, noradrenergic, and serotonergic pathways projecting from the brain-stem to the dorsal horn inhibit nociceptive transmission at the spinal level. Previous attempts to delineate interactions between opioids, norepinephrine (NE), and serotonin (5-HT) in the production of spinal analgesia have produced conflicting results. The present study determined the effect of intrathecal (i.t.) pretreatment with opioid, NE, and 5-HT antagonists upon i.t. monoamine- and morphine-induced antinociception as assessed with the rat tail-flick model. Naloxone, at a dose which antagonized i.t. morphine analgesia, had no effect upon i.t. NE but inhibited i.t. 5-HT antinociception. Corynanthine or yohimbine (NE antagonists) reduced analgesia elicited by i.t. NE but not morphine, while pretreatment with methysergide or ketanserin (5-HT antagonists) attenuated both i.t. 5-HT- and morphine-induced antinociception. These results suggest that 1. (1) an opioid link mediates spinal 5-HT but not NE antinociception, and 2. (2) 5-HT but not NE participates in spinal morphine analgesia. © 1988

Contrasting effects of acute vs. chronic tricyclic antidepressant treatment on central morphine analgesia

Antinociception following central opioid microinjection in rats was assessed weekly via a tail-flick procedure during chronic tricyclic antidepressant (TCA) treatment. (1) Daily TCA: Subcutaneous injections of desipramine (DMI), 30 mg/kg, chlorimipramine (CMI), 10 mg/kg, or saline, 1 ml/kg, were given daily for 22 days. Morphine sulfate (M), 5 μg, was microinjected into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (VLPAG) at 7 day intervals. On day 1, DMI or CMI enhanced M analgesia whereas saline did not. Augmentation of M disappeared by days 8 and 15 for CMI and DMI, respectively and was replaced by attenuation which was still observed on day 22 for both TCAs. l-Tryptophan (LT), 100 mg/kg i.p., on days 15 and 22 temporarily restored TCA enhancement of M. Fourteen days after cessation of all daily TCA treatments, enhancement of M by CMI was similar to that observed on day 1, whereas recovery of DMI-induced facilitation was incomplete. (2) Weekly TCA: Weekly treatment with DMI, CMI, or saline in the same doses as above had similar effects. M analgesia was enhanced by the TCAs but not saline on day 1 ; this facilitation was absent by day 15. Attenuation of M by DMI or CMI was evident on day 22; 2 weeks after cessation of all weekly TCA treatments, complete recovery of TCA-induced augmentation was observed. Loss of M facilitation during chronic daily or weekly TCA administration may be related to reduction of central opioid and/or 5-HT2 receptors. © 1984

Effect of chronic treatment with tricyclic antidepressants upon antinociception induced by intrathecal injection of morphine and monoamines

The effects of acute and chronic treatment with tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) upon antinociception induced by intrathecally administered serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine (NE), and morphine were assessed at weekly intervals by the tail-flick method in the rat. Acute pretreatment with either clomipramine (28.5 μmol/kg, s.c.) or desipramine (85.5 μmol/kg, s.c.) enhanced the analgesia induced by both intrathecally-administered morphine (7.5 nmol) and 5-HT (241 nmol), compared to saline (1 ml/kg) but only desipramine facilitated the effects of intrathecally administered NE (0.49 nmol). The chronic (22 day) administration of both tricyclic antidepressants resulted in loss of the enhancement of the effects of morphine (day 22) and 5-HT (day 15); only desipramine (day 15) abolished the facilitation of NE. In a similar study, acute pretreatment with the non-tricyclic antidepressant inhibitor of the reuptake of NE, nisoxetine, (97.5 μmol/kg, s.c.), amplified the effects of intrathecally administered NE and morphine but not 5-HT-induced analgesia. Although chronic (22 day) treatment with nisoxetine caused a loss of the effects of enhancement of morphine (day 8), there was no effect upon the action of NE and antinociception induced by 5-HT was facilitated (day 22). Receptor binding studies indicated that chronic (22 day) treatment with clomipramine, desipramine or nisoxetine reduced the affinity of opiate [3H]naloxone) receptors in the spinal cord. These results demonstrate that (1) acute treatment with trycyclic antidepressants enhanced analgesia induced by intrathecally injected morphine, and (2) the chronic administration of trycyclic antidepressants resulted in a loss of enhancement of the effects of morphine, given intrathecally, which appeared to be independent of alterations in the activity of NE or 5-HT but may be associated with the development of subsensitive opiate receptors. © 1988