Plasma metanephrines: a novel and cost-effective test for pheochromocytoma

Pheochromocytomas are rare chromaffin cell tumors that nevertheless must be excluded in large numbers of patients who develop sustained or episodic hypertension as well as in many others with suggestive symptoms or with a familial history of pheochromocytoma. Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma depends importantly on biochemical evidence of excess catecholamine production by a tumor. Imperfect sensitivity and specificity of commonly available biochemical tests and the low incidence of the tumor among the tested population mean that considerable time and effort can be expended in confirming or ruling out pheochromocytoma in patients where the tumor is suspected. Measurements of plasma free metanephrines provide a superior test compared to other available tests for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. In particular, the high sensitivity of plasma free metanephrines means that a normal test result reliably excludes all but the smallest of pheochromocytomas so that no other tests are necessary. Measurements of plasma free metanephrines, when systematically combined with other diagnostic procedures outlined in this review, provide a more efficient, reliable and cost-effective approach for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma than offered by previously available approaches

Physiology of behavior.

Physiology of Behavior provides a scholarly yet accessible portrait of the dynamic interaction between biology and behavior. Close collaboration between the author and a talented artist has resulted in beautiful, accurate, and pedagogically effective illustrations in every chapter

Plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine for detecting pheochromocytoma in von Hipple Lindau Disease and Multiple Endocrine Neoplasma type 2

Item does not contain fulltex

Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: how to distinguish true- from false-positive test results.

Item does not contain fulltextMeasurements of plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine provide a highly sensitive test for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, but false-positive results remain a problem. We therefore assessed medication-associated false-positive results and use of supplementary tests, including plasma normetanephrine responses to clonidine, to distinguish true- from false-positive results. The study included 208 patients with pheochromocytoma and 648 patients in whom pheochromocytoma was excluded. Clonidine-suppression tests were carried out in 48 patients with and 49 patients without the tumor. Tricyclic antidepressants and phenoxybenzamine accounted for 41% of false-positive elevations of plasma normetanephrine and 44-45% those of plasma and urinary norepinephrine. High plasma normetanephrine to norepinephrine or metanephrine to epinephrine ratios were strongly predictive of pheochromocytoma. Lack of decrease and elevated plasma levels of norepinephrine or normetanephrine after clonidine also confirmed pheochromocytoma with high specificity. However, 16 of 48 patients with pheochromocytoma had normal levels or decreases of norepinephrine after clonidine. In contrast, plasma normetanephrine remained elevated in all but 2 patients, indicating more reliable diagnosis using normetanephrine than norepinephrine responses to clonidine. Thus, in patients with suspected pheochromocytoma and positive biochemical results, false-positive elevations due to medications should first be eliminated. Patterns of biochemical test results and responses of plasma normetanephrine to clonidine can then help distinguish true- from false-positive results

Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best?

Item does not contain fulltextCONTEXT: Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma depends on biochemical evidence of catecholamine production by the tumor. However, the best test to establish the diagnosis has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: To determine the biochemical test or combination of tests that provides the best method for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Multicenter cohort study of patients tested for pheochromocytoma at 4 referral centers between 1994 and 2001. The analysis included 214 patients in whom the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma was confirmed and 644 patients who were determined to not have the tumor. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Test sensitivity and specificity, receiver operating characteristic curves, and positive and negative predictive values at different pretest prevalences using plasma free metanephrines, plasma catecholamines, urinary catecholamines, urinary total and fractionated metanephrines, and urinary vanillylmandelic acid. RESULTS: Sensitivities of plasma free metanephrines (99% [95% confidence interval [CI], 96%-100%]) and urinary fractionated metanephrines (97% [95% CI, 92%-99%]) were higher than those for plasma catecholamines (84% [95% CI, 78%-89%]), urinary catecholamines (86% [95% CI, 80%-91%]), urinary total metanephrines (77% [95% CI, 68%-85%]), and urinary vanillylmandelic acid (64% [95% CI, 55%-71%]). Specificity was highest for urinary vanillylmandelic acid (95% [95% CI, 93%-97%]) and urinary total metanephrines (93% [95% CI, 89%-97%]); intermediate for plasma free metanephrines (89% [95% CI, 87%-92%]), urinary catecholamines (88% [95% CI, 85%-91%]), and plasma catecholamines (81% [95% CI, 78%-84%]); and lowest for urinary fractionated metanephrines (69% [95% CI, 64%-72%]). Sensitivity and specificity values at different upper reference limits were highest for plasma free metanephrines using receiver operating characteristic curves. Combining different tests did not improve the diagnostic yield beyond that of a single test of plasma free metanephrines. CONCLUSION: Plasma free metanephrines provide the best test for excluding or confirming pheochromocytoma and should be the test of first choice for diagnosis of the tumor

Plasma metanephrines in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.

Item does not contain fulltex