Ubuntu versus the core values of the South African Constitution

At the dawn of South Africa’s new era of constitutionalism the Constitutional Court introduced “African law and legal thinking” and ubuntu to South African jurisprudence as part of the Constitution’s source of democratic values. Whereas the Constitutional Court averred on the one hand that African law sustains firmly entrenched gender inequality, it was contended on the other hand that ubuntu is “in consonance with the values of the Constitution in general and the Bill of Rights in particular”. This article deconstructs the concepts “African law and legal thinking” and ubuntu and contends that ubuntu, African law and African religion are not only inseparable but that ubuntu — the basis of African law — sustains the deep-seated patriarchal hierarchy and entrenched inequality in traditional African societies. This article concludes that ubuntu “is [not] in consonance with the values of the Constitution in general and the Bill of Rights in particular”

The Constitutional Court and ubuntu’s “inseparable trinity”

The purpose of this article is to deconstruct the Constitutional Court’s definitions of ubuntu as humanness, group solidarity, umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu, personhood and a moral philosophy. It is submitted that the philosophy of ubuntu or ethnophilosophy represents a religious worldview as it is inseparable from African Religion and the African spirit world. It is argued that the advocating of ubuntu’s shared beliefs and values by South African courts and the state is to the detriment of other religious philosophies as it violates section 15(1) of the Constitution and constitutes unfair discrimination

Estas son algunas de las habilidades blandas demandadas en Colombia

Este producto forma parte de una serie de infografías de divulgación científica que buscan reseñar algunas de las investigaciones más importantes en las que ha tenido participación la Universidad EAFIT, publicadas en las revistas especializadas más prestigiosas del mund

Ubuntu versus the core values of the South African Constitution

At the dawn of South Africa’s new era of constitutionalism the Constitutional Court introduced “African law and legal thinking” and ubuntu to South African jurisprudence as part of the Constitution’s source of democratic values. Whereas the Constitutional Court averred on the one hand that African law sustains firmly entrenched gender inequality, it was contended on the other hand that ubuntu is “in consonance with the values of the Constitution in general and the Bill of Rights in particular”. This article deconstructs the concepts “African law and legal thinking” and ubuntu and contends that ubuntu, African law and African religion are not only inseparable but that ubuntu — the basis of African law — sustains the deep-seated patriarchal hierarchy and entrenched inequality in traditional African societies. This article concludes that ubuntu “is [not] in consonance with the values of the Constitution in general and the Bill of Rights in particular”

The Constitutional Court and ubuntu’s “inseparable trinity"

The purpose of this article is to deconstruct the Constitutional Court’s definitions of ubuntu as humanness, group solidarity, umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu, personhood and a moral philosophy. It is submitted that the philosophy of ubuntu or ethnophilosophy represents a religious worldview as it is inseparable from African Religion and the African spirit world. It is argued that the advocating of ubuntu’s shared beliefs and values by South African courts and the state is to the detriment of other religious philosophies as it violates section 15(1) of the Constitution and constitutes unfair discrimination. Die Konstitusionele Hof en ubuntu se onskeidbare drie-eenheid: Die oogmerk van hierdie artikel is om die Grondwetlike Hof se definisies van ubuntu as medemenslikheid, groepsolidariteit, umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu, menswees, en ’n morele filosofie te dekonstrueer. Dit word aan die hand gedoen dat die filosofie van ubuntu of etnofilosofie ’n godsdienstige filosofie verteenwoordig aangesien dit onskeidbaar is van die Afrika Geloof en Afrika geesteswêreld. Dit word geargumenteer dat Suid-Afrikaanse howe en die staat se verkondiging van ubuntu oortuigings en waardes tot nadeel is van ander godsdienstige filosofieë aangesien dit artikel 15(1) van die Grondwet skend en onbillike diskriminasie daarstel