11 research outputs found
Clinical and electrophysiological predictors of device-detected new-onset atrial fibrillation during 3 years after cardiac surgery
Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery is an independent predictor of stroke and mortality
late after discharge. We aimed to determine the burden and predictors of early (up to 5th postoperative day) and
late (after 5th postoperative day) new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) using implantable loop recorders (ILRs) in
patients undergoing open chest cardiac surgery
Seventy-nine patients without a history of AF undergoing cardiac surgery underwent peri-operative high-resolution
mapping of electrically induced AF and were followed 36 months after surgery using an ILR (Reveal XTTM). Clinical
and electrophysiological predictors of late POAF were assessed. POAF occurred in 46 patients (58%), with early
POAF detected in 27 (34%) and late POAF in 37 patients (47%). Late POAF episodes were short-lasting (mostly
between 2 min and 6 h) and showed a circadian rhythm pattern with a peak of episode initiation during daytime. In
POAF patients, electrically induced AF showed more complex propagation patterns than in patients without
POAF. Early POAF, right atrial (RA) volume, prolonged PR time, and advanced age were independent predictors of
late POAF
Heart Failure, Female Sex, and Atrial Fibrillation Are the Main Drivers of Human Atrial Cardiomyopathy: Results From the CATCH ME Consortium
Background: Atrial cardiomyopathy (atCM) is an emerging prognostic factor in cardiovascular disease. Fibrotic remodeling, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, and capillary density are hallmarks of atCM. The contribution of etiological factors and atrial fibrillation (AF) to the development of differential atCM phenotypes has not been quantified. This study aimed to evaluate the association between histological features of atCM and the clinical phenotype. Methods and results: We examined left atrial (LA, n=95) and right atrial (RA, n=76) appendages from a European cohort of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Quantification of histological atCM features was performed following wheat germ agglutinin/CD31/vimentin staining. The contributions of AF, heart failure, sex, and age to histological characteristics were determined with multiple linear regression models. Persistent AF was associated with increased endomysial fibrosis (LA: +1.13±0.47 μm, P=0.038; RA: +0.94±0.38 μm, P=0.041), whereas total extracellular matrix content was not. Men had larger cardiomyocytes (LA: +1.92±0.72 μm, P<0.001), while women had more endomysial fibrosis (LA: +0.99±0.56 μm, P=0.003). Patients with heart failure showed more endomysial fibrosis (LA: +1.85±0.48 μm, P<0.001) and extracellular matrix content (LA: +3.07±1.29%, P=0.016), and a higher capillary density (LA: +0.13±0.06, P=0.007) and size (LA: +0.46±0.22 μm, P=0.044). Fuzzy k-means clustering of histological features identified 2 subtypes of atCM: 1 characterized by enhanced endomysial fibrosis (LA: +3.17 μm, P<0.001; RA: +2.86 μm, P<0.001), extracellular matrix content (LA: +3.53%, P<0.001; RA: +6.40%, P<0.001) and fibroblast density (LA: +4.38%, P<0.001), and 1 characterized by cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (LA: +1.16 μm, P=0.008; RA: +2.58 μm, P<0.001). Patients with fibrotic atCM were more frequently female (LA: odds ratio [OR], 1.33, P=0.002; RA: OR, 1.54, P=0.004), with persistent AF (LA: OR, 1.22, P=0.036) or heart failure (LA: OR, 1.62, P<0.001). Hypertrophic features were more common in men (LA: OR=1.33, P=0.002; RA: OR, 1.54, P=0.004). Conclusions: Fibrotic atCM is associated with female sex, persistent AF, and heart failure, while hypertrophic features are more common in men
Does early surgery result in improved long-term survival compared to watchful waiting in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation with preserved ejection fraction?
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation with preserved ejection fraction, is early surgery superior to watchful waiting in terms of long-term survival? Altogether, 648 papers were found using the reported search, 3 of which represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question (all level III evidence). The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. The 3 included studies comprised 469 patients. All 3 studies attempted to correct for potential baseline differences by different matching methods. As a result, a predominantly beneficial effect of early surgery on long-term survival in patients with severe asymptomatic AR and preserved LV function was observed, whereas none of the studies demonstrated a disadvantageous effect. Still, because many of the initially conservatively treated patients eventually proceed to surgery, longer term follow-up is warranted. Of note, older patients especially seem to adapt more poorly to chronic volume overload due to aortic regurgitation, making them potential candidates for a more aggressive approach. However, when a justified watchful waiting strategy is applied, close, extensive monitoring seems to be imperative, because the development of class I and II triggers seems to lead to improved survival
Bayesian interpretation of non-inferiority in transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement trials:a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVES: The concept of non-inferiority is widely adopted in randomized trials comparing transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR, SAVR). However, uncertainty exists regarding the long-term outcomes of TAVR, and non-inferiority may be difficult to assess. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing TAVR and SAVR, with a specific emphasis on the non-inferiority margin for 5-year all-cause mortality. METHODS: A systematic search was applied to three electronic databases. Randomized trials comparing TAVR and SAVR were included. Bayesian methods were implemented to evaluate the posterior probability of non-inferiority at different trial non-inferiority margins under either a vague, Cauchy, or a literature-based prior. Primary outcomes were 5-year actuarial all-cause mortality, and the probability of non-inferiority at various transformed trial non-inferiority margins. Secondary outcomes were long-term survival, and 1- and 2-year actuarial survival. RESULTS: Eight trials (n?=?8698 patients) were included. Kaplan-Meier derived 5-year survival was 61.6% (95% CI 59.8-63.5%) for TAVR, and 63.7% (95% CI 61.9-65.6%) for SAVR. Six trials (n?=?6370 patients) reported all-cause mortality at 5-year follow-up. Under a vague prior, the posterior median relative risk for all-cause mortality of TAVR was 1.14, compared to SAVR (95% credible interval 1.06-1.22, probability of relative risk <1.00?=?0.01%, I2=0%). Similar results in terms of point estimate and uncertainty measures were obtained using frequentist methods. Based on the various trial non-inferiority margins, the results of the analysis suggest that non-inferiority at 5?years is no more likely. CONCLUSIONS: It is unlikely that TAVR is still non-inferior to SAVR at 5?years in terms of all-cause mortality
Preoperative P-wave parameters and risk of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery:a meta-analysis of 20,201 patients
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of P-wave parameters, as defined on preprocedural electrocardiography (ECG), in predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery [postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF)]. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane library and Embase were searched for studies reporting on P-wave parameters and risk of POAF. Meta-analysis of P-wave parameters reported by at least 5 different publications was performed. In case of receiver operator characteristics (ROC-curve) analysis in the original publications, an ROC meta-analysis was performed to summarize the sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: Thirty-two publications, with a total of 20 201 patients, contributed to the meta-analysis. Increased P-wave duration, measured on conventional 12-lead ECG (22 studies, Cohen’s d = 0.4, 95% confidence interval: 0.3–0.5, P < 0.0001) and signal-averaged ECG (12 studies, Cohen’s d = 0.8, 95% confidence interval: 0.5–1.2, P < 0.0001), was a predictor of POAF independently from left atrial size. ROC meta-analysis for signal-averaged ECG P-wave duration showed an overall sensitivity of 72% (95% confidence interval: 65–78%) and specificity of 68% (95% confidence interval: 58–77%). Summary ROC curve had a moderate discriminative power with an area under the curve of 0.76. There was substantial heterogeneity in the meta-analyses for P-wave dispersion and PR-interval. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that increased P-wave duration, measured on conventional 12-lead ECG and signal-averaged ECG, predicted POAF in patients undergoing cardiac surgery
New-onset perioperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery patients:transient trouble or persistent problem?-Authors' reply
Extending Aortic Replacement Beyond the Proximal Arch in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection:A Meta-Analysis of Short Term Outcomes and Long Term Actuarial Survival
OBJECTIVE: The extent of aortic replacement during surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is an important matter of debate. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the short and long term outcomes of a proximal aortic repair (PAR) vs. total arch replacement (TAR) in the treatment of ATAAD. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was performed. Studies comparing PAR to TAR for ATAAD were included. REVIEW METHODS: The primary outcomes were early death and long term actuarial survival at one, five, and 10 years. Random effects models in conjunction with relative risks (RRs) were used for meta-analyses. RESULTS: Nineteen studies were included, comprising 5 744 patients (proximal: n = 4 208; total arch: n = 1 536). PAR was associated with reduced early mortality (10.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.4 - 13.7] vs. 14.0% [95% CI 10.4 - 18.7]; RR 0.73 [95% CI 0.63 - 0.85]) and reduced post-operative renal failure (10.4% [95% CI 7.2 - 14.8] vs. 11.1% [95% CI 6.7 - 17.5]; RR 0.77 [95% CI 0.66 - 0.90]), but there was no difference in stroke (8.0% [95% CI 5.9 - 10.7] vs. 7.3% [95% CI 4.6 - 11.3]; RR 0.87 [95% CI 0.69 - 1.10]). No statistically significant difference was found for survival after one year (83.2% [95% CI 77.5 - 87.7] vs. 78.6% [95% CI 69.7 - 85.5]; RR 1.05 [95% CI 0.99 - 1.11]), which persisted after five years (75.4% [95% CI 71.2 - 79.2] vs. 74.5% [95% CI 64.7 - 82.3]; RR 1.02 [95% CI 0.91 - 1.14]). After 10 years, there was a significant survival benefit for patients who underwent TAR (64.7% [95% CI 61.1 - 68.1] vs. 72.4% [95% CI 67.5 - 76.7]; RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.84 - 0.99]). CONCLUSION: PAR appears to lead to an improved early mortality rate and a reduced complication rate. In the current meta-analysis, the suggestion of an improved 10 year survival benefit of TAR was found, which should be interpreted in the context of potential confounders such as age at presentation, comorbidities, and haemodynamic stability. In any case, PAR seems to be intuitive in older patients with limited dissections, and in those presenting in less stable conditions
Temporary mechanical circulatory support for COVID-19 patients:A systematic review of literature
OBJECTIVE: Myocardial damage occurs in up to 25% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. While veno-venous extracorporeal life support (V-V ECLS) is used as respiratory support, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may be required for severe cardiac dysfunction. This systematic review summarizes the available literature regarding MCS use rates, disease drivers for MCS initiation, and MCS outcomes in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: PubMed/EMBASE were searched until October 14, 2021. Articles including adults receiving ECLS for COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was the rate of MCS use. Secondary outcomes included mortality at follow-up, ECLS conversion rate, intubation-to-cannulation time, time on ECLS, cardiac diseases, use of inotropes, and vasopressors. RESULTS: Twenty-eight observational studies (comprising both ECLS-only populations and ECLS patients as part of larger populations) included 4218 COVID-19 patients (females: 28.8%; median age: 54.3 years, 95%CI: 50.7-57.8) of whom 2774 (65.8%) required ECLS with the majority (92.7%) on V-V ECLS, 4.7% on veno-arterial ECLS and/or Impella, and 2.6% on other ECLS. Acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest were reported in 7.8%, 9.7%, and 6.6% of patients, respectively. Vasopressors were used in 37.2%. Overall, 3.1% of patients required an ECLS change from V-V ECLS to MCS for heart failure, myocarditis, or myocardial infarction. The median ECLS duration was 15.9 days (95%CI: 13.9-16.3), with an overall survival of 54.6% and 28.1% in V-V ECLS and MCS patients. One study reported 61.1% survival with oxy-right ventricular assist device. CONCLUSION: MCS use for cardiocirculatory compromise has been reported in 7.3% of COVID-19 patients requiring ECLS, which is a lower percentage compared to the incidence of any severe cardiocirculatory complication. Based on the poor survival rates, further investigations are warranted to establish the most appropriated indications and timing for MCS in COVID-19