Real-world efficacy of docetaxel plus nintedanib after chemo-immunotherapy failure in advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma

Lay abstract The standard of care for patients with lung adenocarcinoma has advanced with the introduction of immunotherapy in the first-line setting. However, limited clinical data are available to help guide treatment decisions after failure of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Nintedanib is an oral antiangiogenic agent that is approved in the EU and other countries in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic lung adenocarcinoma after first-line chemotherapy. This study is a retrospective, real-world analysis of docetaxel plus nintedanib in 93 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma who progressed on immunotherapy (either in sequence or in combination with chemotherapy). The results suggest that docetaxel plus nintedanib offers a meaningful clinical benefit in this setting. Safety findings were generally consistent with the known safety profile of docetaxel plus nintedanib. Aim: This real-world analysis evaluated docetaxel plus nintedanib in patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma after chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor failure, for whom treatment options are limited. Methods: Data were sourced retrospectively from seven German centers. Results: Of 93 patients, overall response rate was 41.4% (disease control rate: 75.9%). Of 57 patients given third-line docetaxel plus nintedanib, overall response rate was 50.0% (disease control rate: 82.7%). Median overall survival following third-line docetaxel plus nintedanib was 8.4 months. Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profile of docetaxel plus nintedanib. Conclusion: To date, this was the largest retrospective, real-world analysis of docetaxel plus nintedanib after chemotherapy-immunotherapy failure, indicating that docetaxel plus nintedanib offers meaningful clinical benefits in this setting

A Synergistic Interaction between Chk1-and MK2 Inhibitors in KRAS-Mutant Cancer

KRAS is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in human cancer. Despite substantial efforts, no clinically applicable strategy has yet been developed to effectively treat KRAS-mutant tumors. Here, we perform a cell-line-based screen and identify strong synergistic interactions between cell-cycle checkpoint-abrogating Chk1- and MK2 inhibitors, specifically in KRAS- and BRAF-driven cells. Mechanistically, we show that KRAS-mutant cancer displays intrinsic genotoxic stress, leading to tonic Chk1- and MK2 activity. We demonstrate that simultaneous Chk1- and MK2 inhibition leads to mitotic catastrophe in KRAS-mutant cells. This actionable synergistic interaction is validated using xenograft models, as well as distinct Kras- or Braf-driven autochthonous murine cancer models. Lastly, we show that combined checkpoint inhibition induces apoptotic cell death in KRAS- or BRAF-mutant tumor cells directly isolated from patients. These results strongly recommend simultaneous Chk1- and MK2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of KRAS- or BRAF-driven cancers

Genetic Heterogeneity of MET-Aberrant NSCLC and Its Impact on the Outcome of Immunotherapy

Introduction: Robust data on the outcome of MET-aberrant NSCLC with nontargeted therapies are limited, especially in consideration of the heterogeneity of MET-amplified tumors (METamp). Methods: A total of 337 tumor specimens of patients with MET-altered Union for International Cancer Control stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were analyzed using next-generation sequencing, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry. The evaluation focused on the type of MET aberration, co-occurring mutations, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, and overall survival (OS). Results: METamp tumors (n = 278) had a high frequency of co-occurring mutations (>80% for all amplification levels), whereas 57.6% of the 59 patients with MET gene and exon 14 (METex14) tumors had no additional mutations. In the METamp tumors, with increasing gene copy number (GCN), the frequency of inactivating TP53 mutations increased (GCN 10: 76.5%), whereas the frequency of KRAS mutations decreased (GCN 10: 11.8%). A total of 10.1% of all the METamp tumors with a GCN > 10 had a significant worse OS (4.0 mo; 95% CI: 1.9-6.0) compared with the tumors with GCN 10, and METamp GCN 10 subgroup. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

A Genomics-Based Classification of Human Lung Tumors

We characterized genome alterations in 1255 clinically annotated lung tumors of all histological subgroups to identify genetically defined and clinically relevant subtypes. More than 55% of all cases had at least one oncogenic genome alteration potentially amenable to specific therapeutic intervention, including several personalized treatment approaches that are already in clinical evaluation. Marked differences in the pattern of genomic alterations existed between and within histological subtypes, thus challenging the original histomorphological diagnosis. Immunohistochemical studies confirmed many of these reassigned subtypes. The reassignment eliminated almost all cases of large cell carcinomas, some of which had therapeutically relevant alterations. Prospective testing of our genomics-based diagnostic algorithm in 5145 lung cancer patients enabled a genome-based diagnosis in 3863 (75%) patients, confirmed the feasibility of rational reassignments of large cell lung cancer, and led to improvement in overall survival in patients with EGFR-mutant or ALK-rearranged cancers. Thus, our findings provide support for broad implementation of genome-based diagnosis of lung cancer