Ballantyne et al 2015 visitation and pollen deposition data file

Ballantyne et al 2015 visitation and pollen deposition data fil

Appendix A. Flowering plant species present at the two sites during network sampling in 2004 and for equivalent months in 2005 and 2006.

Flowering plant species present at the two sites during network sampling in 2004 and for equivalent months in 2005 and 2006

Appendix B. Comparisons of numbers of flower-visitor links per time interval between observed networks and null model results for visitor species with no significant differences between observed values and null expectations at both study sites in June 2004.

Comparisons of numbers of flower-visitor links per time interval between observed networks and null model results for visitor species with no significant differences between observed values and null expectations at both study sites in June 2004

Appendix H. Examples of variation across time intervals in the links involving specific taxa.

Examples of variation across time intervals in the links involving specific taxa

Appendix F. Comparisons of numbers of flower-visitor links per time interval between observed networks and null model results for all visitor species combined for each monthly network.

Comparisons of numbers of flower-visitor links per time interval between observed networks and null model results for all visitor species combined for each monthly network

Appendix G. Comparisons of numbers of flower-visitor links per time interval between observed networks and null model results for each visitor taxon with significant results across all monthly networks.

Comparisons of numbers of flower-visitor links per time interval between observed networks and null model results for each visitor taxon with significant results across all monthly networks

Appendix I. Results of null model analyses of flower-visitor data from Turkana Boma site in 2006.

Results of null model analyses of flower-visitor data from Turkana Boma site in 2006

Appendix C. Comparisons of numbers of flower-visitor links per time interval between observed networks and null model results for visitor taxa at both study sites in June 2004.

Comparisons of numbers of flower-visitor links per time interval between observed networks and null model results for visitor taxa at both study sites in June 2004

Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analyses of changes in the composition of floral meadows through time and among cities.

<p>A. Perennial meadows across all cities, separated by survey round. B. Annual meadows across all cities, separated by survey round. In A and B, letters and ellipses show the centroid and 95% confidence limits for each survey round. C. Perennial meadows across all survey rounds, separated by city. D. Annual meadows across all survey rounds, separated by city. In C and D, letters and ellipses show the centroid and 95% confidence limits for each city. In D. the centroid for Bristol is hidden by, and almost identical to, the centroid for Leeds.</p

Seasonal patterns in the proportion of available daily nectar sugar contributed by individual plant species for Edinburgh meadows sown with A. perennial, B. annual A1, and C. annual A2 treatments.

<p>The percentage of total meadow nectar sugar mass attributable to each species is indicated by the height of the filled polygon for that species at a given seasonal time point. Values at each time point are based on 100x 1m² quadrats across 5 replicate meadows at each time point for each meadow treatment. Note that in both annual and perennial treatments, native perennial weeds provided up to 100% of nectar and pollen resources early in the year.</p