610 research outputs found

    Focus strategies in chadic : the case of tangale revisited

    Get PDF
    We argue that the standard focus theories reach their limits when confronted with the focus systems of the Chadic languages. The backbone of the standard focus theories consists of two assumptions, both called into question by the languages under consideration. Firstly, it is standardly assumed that focus is generally marked by stress. The Chadic languages, however, exhibit a variety of different devices for focus marking. Secondly, it is assumed that focus is always marked. In Tangale, at least, focus is not marked consistently on all types of constituents. The paper offers two possible solutions to this dilemma

    Morphological focus marking in GĂčrĂčntĂčm (West Chadic)

    Get PDF
    The paper presents an in-depth study of focus marking in GĂčrĂčntĂčm, a West Ch adic language spoken in Bauchi Province of Northern Nigeria. Focus in GĂčrĂčntĂčm is marked morphologically by means of a focus marker a, which typically precedes the focus constituent. Even though the morphological focus-marking system of GĂčrĂčntĂčm allows for a lot of fine-grained distinctions in information structure (IS) in principle, the language is not entirely free of focus ambiguities that arise as the result of conflicting IS- and syntactic requirements that govern the placement of focus markers. We show that morphological focus marking with a applies across different types of focus, such as newinformation, contrastive, selective and corrective focus, and that a does not have a second function as a perfectivity marker, as is assumed in the literature. In contrast, we show at the end of the paper that a can also function as a foregrounding device at the level of discourse structure

    Focus asymmetries in Bura

    Get PDF
    This article presents the central aspects of the focus system of Bura (Chadic), which exhibits a number of asymmetries: Grammatical focus marking is obligatory only with focused subjects, where focus is marked by the particle ĂĄn following the subject. Focused subjects remain in situ and the complement of ĂĄn is a regular VP. With nonsubject foci, ĂĄn appears in a cleft-structure between the fronted focus constituent and a relative clause. We present a semantically unified analysis of focus marking in Bura that treats the particle as a focusmarking copula in T that takes a property-denoting expression (the background) and an individual-denoting expression (the focus) as arguments. The article also investigates the realization of predicate and polarity focus, which are almost never marked. The upshot of the discussion is that Bura shares many characteristic traits of focus marking with other Chadic languages, but it crucially differs in exhibiting a structural difference in the marking of focus on subjects and non-subject constituents

    Mapping Different Worlds of Eco-Welfare States

    Get PDF
    Attention towards topics such as environmental pollution, climate change, or biodiversity has strongly increased in the last years. The struggles to balance market powers and ecological sustainability somehow evoke memories of the early days of European welfare states, when social protection emerged as a means to prevent industrial capitalism from disruptive social tensions due to excessive social inequalities. In fact, social and environmental crises are inseparably intertwined, as ecological destruction is likely to be followed by social deprivation, and a lack of social security can be a crucial barrier for ecologically sustainable action. Our paper seeks to provide a step towards such an integrated perspective by studying problem pressure and public interventions in the area of green welfare, that is, in social and environmental protection. By using available data from Eurostat and Environmental Performance Index (EPI) databases, we contrast environmental and social performances to detect links between the social and the ecological dimension in these areas and unearth different configurations of green welfare among European countries. Our findings suggest that there are different "worlds of eco-welfare states" which only partially overlap with the more conventional "world of welfare states" but show how the Nordic countries are in the relatively-better performing cluster

    Unravelling deservingness: Which criteria do people use to judge the relative deservingness of welfare target groups? A vignette-based focus group study

    Get PDF
    Previous research suggests that European citizens share consistent attitudes towards the relative deservingness of different target groups of social policy, such as perceiving elderly people as most deserving, unemployed people as less deserving and immigrants as least deserving. Yet, it is unclear which criteria people apply when making these judgements. In this article, we explore the reasoning behind deservingness judgements. We analyse how four focus groups – from the middle class, the working class, young people and elderly people – discuss and rank various vignettes representing welfare target groups. Our focus groups’ rankings mirror the well-established rank order of welfare target groups, and we also introduce further target groups: median-income families, low-income earners, and well-off earners. Our analyses of reasoning patterns show that depending on the target group specific combinations of deservingness criteria suggested in the literature (e.g. need, reciprocity, identity, control) are applied, and we suggest adding a further criterion emphasizing future returns on invested resources (‘social investment’). Furthermore, by comparing focus groups, we find that different groups back up similar rankings by differing criteria, suggesting that below the surface of a ‘common deservingness culture’ linger class and other differences in perceiving welfare deservingness.NORFACE Welfare State FuturesPeer Reviewe

    "Darf ich Ihnen meine Karte geben?": Rezension zu "EuropÀisches Lobbying: Ein Berufsfeld zwischen Professionalismus und Aktivismus" von Christian Lahusen

    Get PDF
    Christian Lahusen: EuropÀisches Lobbying - Ein Berufsfeld zwischen Professionalismus und Aktivismus. Frankfurt am Main u.a. Campus Verlag 2020. 978-3-593-51202-

    Rasheed Araeens Mediterranea. An ongoing Conceptual Art Project

    Get PDF
    Abstract folgt

    Defining Early Positive Response to Psychotherapy: An Empirical Comparison Between Clinically Significant Change Criteria and Growth Mixture Modeling

    Get PDF
    Several different approaches have been applied to identify early positive change in response to psychotherapy so as to predict later treatment outcome and length as well as use this information for outcome monitoring and treatment planning. In this study, simple methods based on clinically significant change criteria and computationally demanding growth mixture modeling (GMM) are compared with regard to their overlap and uniqueness as well as their characteristics in terms of initial impairment, therapy outcome, and treatment length. The GMM approach identified a highly specific subgroup of early improving patients. These patients were characterized by higher average intake impairments and higher pre- to-posttreatment score differences. Although being more specific for the prediction of treatment success, GMM was much less sensitive than clinically significant and reliable change criteria. There were no differences between the groups with regard to treatment length. Because each of the approaches had specific advantages, results suggest a combination of both methods for practical use in routine outcome monitoring and treatment planning

    Effective slow dynamics models for a class of dispersive systems

    Get PDF
    We consider dispersive systems of the form ∂_t U = Λ_U U + B_U (U, V ), Δ∂_t V = Λ_V V + B_V (U, U ) in the singular limit Δ → 0, where Λ_U , Λ_V are linear and B_U, B_V bilinear mappings. We are interested in deriving error estimates for the approximation obtained through the regular limit system ∂_t ψ_U = Λ_U ψ_U − B_U (ψ_U , Λ^{−1}_V B_V (ψ_U, ψ_U )) from a more general point of view. Our abstract approximation theorem applies to a number of semilinear systems, such as the Dirac-Klein-Gordon system, the Klein-Gordon-Zakharov system, and a mean field polaron model. It extracts the common features of scattered results in the literature, but also gains an approximation result for the Dirac-Klein-Gordon system which has not been documented in the literature before. We explain that our abstract approximation theorem is sharp in the sense that there exists a quasilinear system of the same structure where the regular limit system makes wrong predictions
    • 

    corecore