Clipping through a mirror: First reported successful MitraClip in a patient with dextrocardia

N

Right vs. left ventricular longitudinal strain for mortality prediction after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

INTRODUCTION This study aims at exploring biventricular remodelling and its implications for outcome in a representative patient cohort with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS AND RESULTS Pre-interventional echocardiographic examinations of 100 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI were assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography of both ventricles. Association with mortality was determined for right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS), RV free wall strain (RVFWS) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS). During a median follow-up of 1,367 [959-2,123] days, 33 patients (33%) died. RVGLS was lower in non-survivors [-13.9% (-16.4 to -12.9)] than survivors [-17.1% (-20.2 to -15.2); P = 0.001]. In contrast, LVGLS as well as the conventional parameters LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and RV fractional area change (RVFAC) did not differ (P = ns). Kaplan-Meier analyses indicated a reduced survival probability when RVGLS was below the -14.6% cutpoint (P < 0.001). Lower RVGLS was associated with higher mortality [HR 1.13 (95% CI 1.04-1.23); P = 0.003] independent of LVGLS, LVEF, RVFAC, and EuroSCORE II. Addition of RVGLS clearly improved the fitness of bivariable and multivariable models including LVGLS, LVEF, RVFAC, and EuroSCORE II with potential incremental value for mortality prediction. In contrast, LVGLS, LVEF, and RVFAC were not associated with mortality. DISCUSSION In patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI, RVGLS but not LVGLS was reduced in non-survivors compared to survivors, differentiated non-survivors from survivors, was independently associated with mortality, and exhibited potential incremental value for outcome prediction. RVGLS appears to be more suitable than LVGLS for risk stratification in AS and timely valve replacement

"Puncture-to-Loop" Technique to Retrieve Embolized Patent Foramen Ovale Occluder

A 62-year-old man experienced embolization of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) occlusion device in the pulmonary artery. The device was successfully retrieved using "puncture to loop" technique, without the need of specific materials. This is a challenging retrieval situation, confirming the feasibility and flexibility of the technique. (Level of Difficulty: Advanced.)

Case Report: Sapien 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve Embolization: Cause, Management, and Redo

The transcatheter heart valve (THV) embolization is a rare but challenging complication in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We report the case of an 81-year-old man with Sapien 3 embolization caused by interrupted rapid pacing. In this setting, we describe the embolized THV management and the technique of the second Sapien 3 implantation

Left ventricular global work index and prediction of cardiovascular mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

INTRODUCTION Echocardiography is used for assessment of patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Global work index (GWI) integrates LV deformation throughout the cardiac cycle and LV afterload and may be advantageous for long-term follow-up. METHODS We analysed 144 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI and echocardiography within two weeks afterwards. GE EchoPAC v2.6 was applied for determining LV ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain (GLS), stroke work (SW), cardiac power output (CPO), and GWI. The endpoint was cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS During median follow-up of 625 [IQR: 511-770] days, 20 (14%) patients died. Clinical baseline characteristics were comparable between non-survivors and survivors. GWI (p = 0.003) and LVEF (p = 0.039) were lower in non-survivors, while GLS, SW, and CPO were not different. In Kaplan-Meier analysis patients with GWI ≤1234 mmHg% exhibited a lower survival probability (P = 0.006). In univariable Cox regression, a significant mortality association was identified for GWI (P = 0.004), weaker for LVEF (P = 0.014), but not for the other parameters. In multivariable Cox regression, GWI independently improved an LV systolic function model including LVEF and GLS. Similarly, GWI but not LVEF independently improved outcome association of different clinical models. CONCLUSIONS GWI was lower in non-survivors than survivors, differentiated non-survivors from survivors, was associated with mortality independent of clinical or LV parameters, and improved the fitness of clinical or LV prediction models. In contrast, GLS, SW, and CPO did not show any of these properties. GWI provides added value for follow-up after TAVI possibly by integrating LV deformation throughout the cardiac cycle

Right vs. left ventricular longitudinal strain for mortality prediction after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

IntroductionThis study aims at exploring biventricular remodelling and its implications for outcome in a representative patient cohort with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).Methods and resultsPre-interventional echocardiographic examinations of 100 patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI were assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography of both ventricles. Association with mortality was determined for right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS), RV free wall strain (RVFWS) and left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS). During a median follow-up of 1,367 [959–2,123] days, 33 patients (33%) died. RVGLS was lower in non-survivors [−13.9% (−16.4 to −12.9)] than survivors [−17.1% (−20.2 to −15.2); P = 0.001]. In contrast, LVGLS as well as the conventional parameters LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and RV fractional area change (RVFAC) did not differ (P = ns). Kaplan–Meier analyses indicated a reduced survival probability when RVGLS was below the −14.6% cutpoint (P &lt; 0.001). Lower RVGLS was associated with higher mortality [HR 1.13 (95% CI 1.04–1.23); P = 0.003] independent of LVGLS, LVEF, RVFAC, and EuroSCORE II. Addition of RVGLS clearly improved the fitness of bivariable and multivariable models including LVGLS, LVEF, RVFAC, and EuroSCORE II with potential incremental value for mortality prediction. In contrast, LVGLS, LVEF, and RVFAC were not associated with mortality.DiscussionIn patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI, RVGLS but not LVGLS was reduced in non-survivors compared to survivors, differentiated non-survivors from survivors, was independently associated with mortality, and exhibited potential incremental value for outcome prediction. RVGLS appears to be more suitable than LVGLS for risk stratification in AS and timely valve replacement

Assessing the level of radiation experienced by anesthesiologists during transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and protection by a lead cap

OBJECTIVE Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has become a standard therapy for patients with aortic valve stenosis. Fluoroscopic imaging is essential for TAVI with the anesthesiologist's workplace close to patient's head side. While the use of lead-caps has been shown to be useful for interventional cardiologists, data are lacking for anesthesiologists. METHODS A protective cap with a 0.35 lead-equivalent was worn on 15 working days by one anesthesiologist. Six detectors (three outside, three inside) were analyzed to determine the reduction of radiation. Literature search was conducted between April and October 2018. RESULTS In the observational period, 32 TAVI procedures were conducted. A maximum radiation dose of 0.55 mSv was detected by the dosimeters at the outside of the cap. The dosimeters inside the cap, in contrast, displayed a constant radiation dose of 0.08 mSv. CONCLUSION The anesthesiologist's head is exposed to significant radiation during TAVI and it can be protected by wearing a lead-cap