Classes of depression symptom trajectories in patients with major depression receiving a collaborative care intervention

Purpose Collaborative care is effective in improving symptoms of patients with depression. The aims of this study were to characterize symptom trajectories in patients with major depression during one year of collaborative care and to explore associations between baseline characteristics and symptom trajectories. Methods We conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial in primary care. The collaborative care intervention comprised case management and behavioral activation. We used the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) to assess symptom severity as the primary outcome. Statistical analyses comprised latent growth mixture modeling and a hierarchical binary logistic regression model. Results We included 74 practices and 626 patients (310 intervention and 316 control recipients) at baseline. Based on a minimum of 12 measurement points for each intervention recipient, we identified two latent trajectories, which we labeled \u27fast improvers\u27 (60.5%) and \u27slow improvers\u27 (39.5%). At all measurements after baseline, \u27fast improvers\u27 presented higher PHQ mean values than \u27slow improvers\u27. At baseline, \u27fast improvers\u27 presented fewer physical conditions, higher health-related quality of life, and had made fewer suicide attempts in their history. Conclusions A notable proportion of 39.5% of patients improved only \u27slowly\u27 and probably needed more intense treatment. The third follow-up in month two could well be a sensible time to adjust treatment to support \u27slow improvers\u27. (DIPF/Orig.

Gender Differences in Perceived Working Conditions of General Practitioners During the COVID-19 Pandemic-a Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has revealed gender-specific differences between general practitioners in adapting to the posed challenges. As primary care workforce is becoming increasingly female, in many countries, it is essential to take a closer look at gender-specific influences when the global health care system is confronted with a crisis. OBJECTIVE To explore gender-specific differences in the perceived working conditions and gender-specific differences in challenges facing GPs at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. DESIGN Online survey in seven countries. PARTICIPANTS 2,602 GPs from seven countries (Austria, Australia, Switzerland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Slovenia). Of the respondents, 44.4% (n = 1,155) were women. MAIN MEASURES Online survey. We focused on gender-specific differences in general practitioners' perceptions of working conditions at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. KEY RESULTS Female GPs rated their skills and self-confidence significantly lower than male GPs (f: 7.1, 95%CI: 6.9-7.3 vs. m: 7.6, 95%CI 7.4-7.8; p < .001), and their perceived risk (concerned about becoming infected or infecting others) higher than men (f: 5.7, 95%CI: 5.4-6.0 vs. m: 5.1, 95%CI: 4.8-5.5; p = .011). Among female GPs, low self-confidence in the treatment of COVID-19 patients appear to be common. Results were similar in all of the participating countries. CONCLUSIONS Female and male GPs differed in terms of their self-confidence when dealing with COVID-19-related issues and their perceptions of the risks arising from the pandemic. To ensure optimal medical care, it is important that GPs realistically assess their own abilities and overall risk

Association between multimorbidity patterns and chronic pain in elderly primary care patients: a cross-sectional observational study

Background: Multimorbidity is a highly prevalent health problem, which may reduce adherence, produce conflicts in treatment, and is not yet supported by evidence-based clinical recommendations. Many older people suffer from more than one chronic disease as well as from chronic pain. There is some evidence that disease management can become more complex if multimorbid patients suffer from chronic pain. In order to better consider the patients' comorbidity spectrum in clinical pain treatment recommendations, evidence is needed regarding which disease combinations are frequently related with the presence of chronic pain. Therefore, our aim is to identify diseases and disease combinations in a multimorbid population, which are associated with the patient-reported presence of chronic pain. Methods: Analyses are based on cross-sectional data of the MultiCare Cohort Study, an observational cohort study based on interviews with 3189 multimorbid patients aged 65+, randomly selected from 158 practices, and their GPs. The response rate was 46.2 %. Data were collected in GP interviews and comprehensive patient interviews. Diseases and disease combinations associated with chronic pain were identified by CART (classification and regression tree) analyses performed separately for both genders. 46 chronic conditions were used as predictor variables and a dichotomized score from the Graded Chronic Pain Scale was used as outcome variable. Results: About 60 % of the study participants were female. Women more often reported chronic pain than men. The most important predictor of a higher pain level in the female population was chronic low back problems, especially if combined with chronic gastritis, hyperuricemia/gout, cardiac insufficiency, neuropathies or depression. Regarding the pain level the male population was also divided best by chronic low back problems, especially if combined with intestinal diverticulosis, neuropathies or chronic ischemic heart disease. Conclusions: Our analyses are a first step in identifying diseases and disease combinations that are related to chronic pain. The most important condition seems to be low back problems. Back pain and pain in other body regions seems to be interrelated with cardiometabolic conditions. In women, psychosocial issues like depression also seem to be relevant

COVI-Prim international: Similarities and discrepancies in the way general practices from seven different countries coped with the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES General practitioners (GPs) are frequently patients' first point of contact with the healthcare system and play an important role in identifying, managing and monitoring cases. This study investigated the experiences of GPs from seven different countries in the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN International cross-sectional online survey. SETTING General practitioners from Australia, Austria, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Slovenia and Switzerland. PARTICIPANTS Overall, 1,642 GPs completed the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES We focused on how well-prepared GPs were, their self-confidence and concerns, efforts to control the spread of the disease, patient contacts, information flow, testing procedures and protection of staff. RESULTS GPs gave high ratings to their self-confidence (7.3, 95% CI 7.1-7.5) and their efforts to control the spread of the disease (7.2, 95% CI 7.0-7.3). A decrease in the number of patient contacts (5.7, 95% CI 5.4-5.9), the perception of risk (5.3 95% CI 4.9-5.6), the provision of information to GPs (4.9, 95% CI 4.6-5.2), their testing of suspected cases (3.7, 95% CI 3.4-3.9) and their preparedness to face a pandemic (mean: 3.5; 95% CI 3.2-3.7) were rated as moderate. GPs gave low ratings to their ability to protect staff (2.2 95% CI 1.9-2.4). Differences were identified in all dimensions except protection of staff, which was consistently low in all surveyed GPs and countries. CONCLUSION Although GPs in the different countries were confronted with the same pandemic, its impact on specific aspects differed. This partly reflected differences in health care systems and experience of recent pandemics. However, it also showed that the development of structured care plans in case of future infectious diseases requires the early involvement of primary care representatives

Primary care management for optimized antithrombotic treatment [PICANT]: study protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial

Background: Antithrombotic treatment is a continuous therapy that is often performed in general practice and requires careful safety management. The aim of this study is to investigate whether a best practice model that applies major elements of case management, including patient education, can improve antithrombotic management in primary health care in terms of reducing major thromboembolic and bleeding events. Methods: This 24-month cluster-randomized trial will be performed in 690 adult patients from 46 practices. The trial intervention will be a complex intervention involving general practitioners, health care assistants and patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation. To assess adherence to medication and symptoms in patients, as well as to detect complications early, health care assistants will be trained in case management and will use the Coagulation-Monitoring-List (Co-MoL) to regularly monitor patients. Patients will receive information (leaflets and a video), treatment monitoring via the Co-MoL and be motivated to perform self-management. Patients in the control group will continue to receive treatment-as-usual from their general practitioners. The primary endpoint is the combined endpoint of all thromboembolic events requiring hospitalization, and all major bleeding complications. Secondary endpoints are mortality, hospitalization, strokes, major bleeding and thromboembolic complications, severe treatment interactions, the number of adverse events, quality of anticoagulation, health-related quality of life and costs. Further secondary objectives will be investigated to explain the mechanism by which the intervention is effective: patients' assessment of chronic illness care, self-reported adherence to medication, general practitioners' and health care assistants' knowledge, patients' knowledge and satisfaction with shared decision making. Practice recruitment is expected to take place between July and December 2012. Recruitment of eligible patients will start in July 2012. Assessment will occur at three time points: baseline (T0), follow-up after 12 (T1) and after 24 months (T2). Discussion: The efficacy and effectiveness of individual elements of the intervention, such as antithrombotic interventions, self-management concepts in orally anticoagulated patients and the methodological tool, case-management, have already been extensively demonstrated. This project foresees the combination of several proven instruments, as a result of which we expect to profit from a reduction in the major complications associated with antithrombotic treatment

Möglichkeiten durch Delegation hausärztlicher Leistungen am Beispiel von Versorgungsassistentinnen in der Hausarztpraxis (VERAH)

Hintergrund: Die Delegation ärztlicher Leistungen an nichtärztliches medizinisches Fachpersonal wird in Deutschland vor dem Hintergrund eines absehbaren Hausärztemangels bei gleichzeitig wachsendem Bedarf an hausärztlichen Betreuungsleistungen seit einiger Zeit diskutiert. Inzwischen wurden unterschiedliche Qualifikationsmodelle für Medizinische Fachangestellte (MFA) (z.B. die Versorgungs-assistentin in der Hausarztpraxis, VERAH) konzipiert und implementiert, die für eine Delegation von Leistungen qualifizieren. VERAH sind v.a. in Baden-Württemberg in Hausarztpraxen tätig, da deren Einsatz dort im Rahmen der Hausarztzentrierten Versorgung (HzV) seit 2008 finanziell honoriert wird. Dabei ist es den Praxen freigestellt, wie sie das VERAH-Konzept und damit auch die Delegation umsetzen. Auch gesetzliche Vorgaben zur Delegation lassen erheblichen Spielraum bei der Umsetzung. Erschwerend kommt hinzu, dass weiterhin Unklarheit darüber besteht, welche Leistungsübertragung als „Delegation“ und welche eher als „Substitution“ zu verstehen ist. Zielrichtung der Arbeit: Ziel dieser publikationsbasierten Dissertation ist eine Darstellung der Formen und Graduierungen von Delegation, d.h. der tatsächlichen Umsetzung von Leistungsübertragung in der Hausarztpraxis am Beispiel der VERAH in Baden-Württemberg. Es können Empfehlungen für das Gelingen der Delegation aus der Analyse von Ergebnissen auf Patienten-, Praxis- und Teamebene abgeleitet werden. Resultate: Diese Dissertation basiert auf sechs Publikationen, die im Rahmen von zwei Projekten zur Evaluation des VERAH-Einsatzes in der HzV in Baden-Württemberg entstanden. Die Evaluationen basieren auf einem Mixed Methods-Design, d.h. auf der Analyse von querschnittlich erhobenen quantitativen Daten sowie qualitativen Daten zu verschiedenen Fragen des VERAH-Einsatzes. Es existiert ein breites Spektrum an Formen und Graduierungen der Delegation in Hausarztpraxen, die am HzV-Modell teilnehmen. VERAH übernehmen einerseits supplementäre (zusätzliche) ärztliche Tätigkeiten, wie z.B. Geriatrisches Assessment oder Impfberatungen, aber auch komplementäre (ergänzende) Tätigkeiten wie z.B. die Beratung der Angehörigen zu Hilfeleistungen im Gesundheitssystem. Vor allem im Rahmen von Hausbesuchen üben VERAH auch substituierende (ersetzende) Funktionen aus. Auf Patientenseite sind gerade ältere, multimorbide und pflegebedürftige Patienten Empfänger delegierter Leistungen. Sie erhalten eine umfassende Betreuung und werden beim Erhalt ihrer häuslichen Selbständigkeit unterstützt. Die Patienten sehen in der VERAH eine zusätzliche Vertrauensperson in der Praxis und akzeptieren sie als kompetente Ansprechpartnerin. Die Hausärzte profitieren durch die Delegation von Tätigkeiten an VERAH, indem sie entlastet werden und Zeit für wichtige medizinische Aufgaben gewinnen. Für VERAH stellt die Delegation eine Erweiterung ihrer Tätigkeits- und Kompetenzbereiche dar und kann insofern als ein Schritt zur Professionalisierung des nichtärztlichen Personals einer Hausarztpraxis gelten. Viele Faktoren, die zum Gelingen einer Umsetzung der Delegation beitragen, können vom hausärztlichen Team selbst beeinflusst werden. Darunter fallen das Engagement der MFA, die Qualifikation, zeitliche Flexibilität, ausreichend Gestaltungsspielraum, Grad der Autonomie, Abgrenzung des Verantwortungsbereiches und auch adäquates Equipment. Entsprechend richten sich die hier formulierten Empfehlungen meist an die Praxis, aber auch an den Gesetzgeber. Bedeutung für die übergeordnete Fragestellung: Die Ergebnisse dieser Arbeit zeigen, dass mit dem VERAH-Konzept erste Ansätze einer teambasierten Versorgung vorhanden sind, und dass sich die Analyse dieses Konzeptes eignet, um Desiderata für die Zukunft von Delegation (haus-)ärztlicher Leistungen an nichtärztliches Personal formulieren zu können. Teambasierte Ansätze bedürfen, wie auch internationale Beispiele verdeutlichen, einer Weiterentwicklung der bestehenden Delegationskonzepte in deutschen Hausarztpraxen. Idealerweise mündet eine mit Delegation einhergehende Aufgaben- und Rollenneuverteilung in einer Betreuungsform, in der alle Teammitglieder entsprechend ihrer Qualifikation an der Versorgung der Patienten in der Hausarztpraxis beteiligt sind. Daher kommt die Einbindung von Pflegekräften in die hausärztliche Versorgung genauso in Frage, wie auch speziell ausgebildete VERAH/MFA. In jedem Fall sollte über Schritte der Professionalisierung nichtärztlicher Berufsgruppen nachgedacht werden. Ob sich in Deutschland, wie in den USA und in Kanada, aus diesen Delegationskonzepten im Laufe der Zeit Substitution (im Sinne der Verantwortungsübertragung an nichtärztliche Berufsgruppen) entwickelt, bleibt abzuwarten. Die Ergebnisse der Dissertation zeigen, dass es mit der gegenwärtigen Umsetzung der Delegation an VERAH zu einer Erweiterung des Leistungsspektrums in den Hausarztpraxen kommen kann; eine Ausweitung der Delegation sollte jedoch zeitnah vorangetrieben werden.Background: Against the background of a foreseeable shortage of family doctors and a simultaneously increasing need for primary care services, the delegation of medical services to non-physician medical professionals has been a subject of debate for some time in Germany. As a result, various qualification models for health care assistants (e.g. specially qualified health care assistants in the family practice, or VERAHs) that are trained to perform selected services have now been drawn up and implemented. Since 2008, the deployment of VERAHs has received financial support as part of the GP centered health care program (HzV) in Baden-Wuerttemberg, and as a result VERAHs are widespread in the state. Practices are free to implement the VERAH concept and to delegate services as they see fit. Legal guidelines also provide much scope in the means of implementation. It is also difficult to define which transfer of services should be considers delegation and which substitution. Aim of the study: The aim of this publication-based dissertation is to present the types and degrees of delegation that take place, i.e., the actual implementation of a transfer of responsibilities in the family practice, using VERAHs in Baden-Wuerttemberg as an example. A further objective is to develop recommendations on how to delegate successfully from the analysis of results on a patient, practice and practice-team level. Results: This dissertation is based on six publications that stem from two projects aimed at evaluating the use of VERAHs in HzV in Baden-Wuerttemberg. The evaluations use a mixed-methods design, i.e., they analyze cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative data relating to various questions concerning the use of VERAHs. There is a wide range of types and degrees of delegation in use in family practices participating in the HzV model. On the one hand, VERAHs take on additional tasks normally performed by the doctor, such as geriatric assessments or vaccination recommendations, but also complementary tasks, such as advising relatives on services provided within the health system. VERAHs also substitute for the doctor by performing home visits. As far as patients are concerned, VERAHs are mainly delegated to provide services for the elderly, the multimorbid and those in need of high-maintenance care. They receive comprehensive care and are supported in preserving their domestic independence. Patients see VERAHs as additional health professionals in the practice and accept them as competent contact persons. The delegation of tasks to VERAHs unburdens family doctors and enables them to gain time for important medical tasks. For VERAHs, the delegation means their field of activity and competence is broadened. It can further be regarded as a step towards the professionalization of non-physician staff in the family practice. The analysis of the implementation of delegation shows that many of the factors which enable delegation to be successful can be influenced by the family practice team, such as the dedication of the health care assistant, the qualification itself, temporal flexibility, sufficient organizational freedom, the degree of autonomy, a clear definition of responsibilities, and adequate equipment. The recommendations made here are mostly directed towards the practice but also towards legislators. Relevance to the primary question: The results of this study show that the VERAH concept represents the beginnings of a team-based approach, and that the analysis of this concept is well suited to the formulation of requirements for the delegation of physician services to non-physician personnel in the future. International examples show that team based approaches require the further development of existing delegation concepts in family practices. Ideally, the redistribution of tasks and roles that result from delegation will lead to a form of health care in which all team members are involved in caring for patients in line with their qualifications. Thus the involvement of nurses in family practice-based health care should be considered, in addition to specially trained VERAH/HCA. It is essential that thought is given to the professionalization of non-physician health occupations. In the U.S. and Canada, substitution (in the sense of the transfer of responsibilities to non-physician professions) developed out of such delegation concepts, but it remains to be seen whether this will also occur in Germany. The results of the research described in this dissertation show that the way delegation to VERAHs is currently carried out can lead to an expansion in the range of services provided in family practices. However, the extension of delegation should be promoted promptly

Sharing Responsibilities within the General Practice Team - A Cross-Sectional Study of Task Delegation in Germany.

BACKGROUND:Expected growth in the demand for health services has generated interest in the more effective deployment of health care assistants. Programs encouraging German general practitioners (GPs) to share responsibility for care with specially qualified health care assistants in the family practice (VERAHs) have existed for several years. But no studies have been conducted on the tasks German GPs are willing to rely on specially qualified personnel to perform, what they are prepared to delegate to all non-physician practice staff and what they prefer to do themselves. METHODS:As part of an evaluation study on the deployment of VERAHs in GP-centered health care, we used a questionnaire to ask about task delegation within the practice team. From a list of tasks that VERAHs are specifically trained to carry out, GPs were asked to indicate which they actually delegate. We also asked GPs why they had employed a VERAH in their practice and for their opinions on the benefits and limitations of assigning tasks to VERAHs. The aim of the study was to find out which tasks GPs delegate to their specially qualified personnel, which they permit all HCAs to carry out, and which tasks they do not delegate at all. RESULTS:The survey was filled in and returned by 245 GPs (83%). Some tasks were exclusively delegated to VERAHs (e.g. home visits), while others were delegated to all HCAs (e.g. vaccinations). About half the GPs rated the assessment of mental health, as part of the comprehensive assessment of a patient's condition, as the sole responsibility of a GP. The possibility to delegate more complex tasks was the main reason given for employing a VERAH. Doctors said the delegation of home visits provided them with the greatest relief. CONCLUSIONS:In Germany, where GPs are solely accountable for the health care provided in their practices, experience with the transfer of responsibility to other non-physician health care personnel is still very limited. When HCAs have undergone special training, GPs seem to be prepared to delegate tasks that demand a substantial degree of know-how, such as home visits and case management. This "new" role allocation within the practice may signal a shift in the provision of health care by family practice teams in Germany

Sharing Responsibilities within the General Practice Team – A Cross-Sectional Study of Task Delegation in Germany

<div><p>Background</p><p>Expected growth in the demand for health services has generated interest in the more effective deployment of health care assistants. Programs encouraging German general practitioners (GPs) to share responsibility for care with specially qualified health care assistants in the family practice (VERAHs) have existed for several years. But no studies have been conducted on the tasks German GPs are willing to rely on specially qualified personnel to perform, what they are prepared to delegate to all non-physician practice staff and what they prefer to do themselves.</p><p>Methods</p><p>As part of an evaluation study on the deployment of VERAHs in GP-centered health care, we used a questionnaire to ask about task delegation within the practice team. From a list of tasks that VERAHs are specifically trained to carry out, GPs were asked to indicate which they actually delegate. We also asked GPs why they had employed a VERAH in their practice and for their opinions on the benefits and limitations of assigning tasks to VERAHs. The aim of the study was to find out which tasks GPs delegate to their specially qualified personnel, which they permit all HCAs to carry out, and which tasks they do not delegate at all.</p><p>Results</p><p>The survey was filled in and returned by 245 GPs (83%). Some tasks were exclusively delegated to VERAHs (e.g. home visits), while others were delegated to all HCAs (e.g. vaccinations). About half the GPs rated the assessment of mental health, as part of the comprehensive assessment of a patient’s condition, as the sole responsibility of a GP.</p><p>The possibility to delegate more complex tasks was the main reason given for employing a VERAH. Doctors said the delegation of home visits provided them with the greatest relief.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>In Germany, where GPs are solely accountable for the health care provided in their practices, experience with the transfer of responsibility to other non-physician health care personnel is still very limited. When HCAs have undergone special training, GPs seem to be prepared to delegate tasks that demand a substantial degree of know-how, such as home visits and case management. This “new” role allocation within the practice may signal a shift in the provision of health care by family practice teams in Germany.</p></div

Tasks not delegated at all, delegated mainly to VERAHs, and delegated to all non-physician staff.

<p>Tasks not delegated at all, delegated mainly to VERAHs, and delegated to all non-physician staff.</p