18 research outputs found
Models for Moodyβs bank ratings
The paper presents an econometric study of the two bank ratings assigned by Moody's Investors Service. According to Moodyβs methodology, foreign-currency long-term deposit ratings are assigned on the basis of Bank Finan-cial Strength Ratings (BFSR), taking into account βexternal bank support factorsβ (joint-default analysis, JDA). Models for the (unobserved) external support are presented, and we find that models based solely on public infor-mation can approximate the ratings reasonably well. It appears that the ob-served rating degradation can be explained by the growth of the banking sys-tem as a whole. Moodyβs has a special approach for banks in developing countries in general and for Russia in particular. The models help reveal the factors that are important for external bank support
Models for Moodyβs bank ratings
The paper presents an econometric study of the two bank ratings assigned by Moody's Investors Service. According to Moodyβs methodology, foreign-currency long-term deposit ratings are assigned on the basis of Bank Finan-cial Strength Ratings (BFSR), taking into account βexternal bank support factorsβ (joint-default analysis, JDA). Models for the (unobserved) external support are presented, and we find that models based solely on public infor-mation can approximate the ratings reasonably well. It appears that the ob-served rating degradation can be explained by the growth of the banking sys-tem as a whole. Moodyβs has a special approach for banks in developing countries in general and for Russia in particular. The models help reveal the factors that are important for external bank support
ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΡ Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ²
The paper presents econometric analysis of the of Russian banks ratings, and the expertsβ opinion based on a survey, designed in a framework of the project. From the ratings and the survey we derived the factors that in the expertsβ opinion and in the rating agenciesβ opinion are most important for bank reliability. The models of the ratings and expertsβ opinions were designed for real and virtual banks. We constructed the model ratings of the Russian banks. These models use only publicly available information and hence could be used as an early warning system of the current bank reliability
ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΎΠ² ΡΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΉΡΠΊΠΈΡ Π±Π°Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ²
The paper presents econometric analysis of the of Russian banks ratings, and the expertsβ opinion based on a survey, designed in a framework of the project. From the ratings and the survey we derived the factors that in the expertsβ opinion and in the rating agenciesβ opinion are most important for bank reliability. The models of the ratings and expertsβ opinions were designed for real and virtual banks. We constructed the model ratings of the Russian banks. These models use only publicly available information and hence could be used as an early warning system of the current bank reliability
Macro-financial linkages and bank behaviour: evidence from the second-round effects of the global financial crisis on East Asia
This paper studies the link between macro-financial variability and bank behaviour, which justifies the second-round effects of the global financial crisis on East Asia. Following Gallego et al. (The impact of the global economic and financial crisis on Central Eastern and South Eastern Europe (CESEE) and Latin America, 2010), the second round effects are defined as the adverse feedback loop from the slumps in economic activities and sharp financial market deterioration, which may influence the financial performance of bank, inter alia via deteriorating credit quality, declining profitability and increasing problems in retaining necessary capitalization. Differentiating itself from other research, this study stresses adjustments in four dimensions of bank performance and behaviour: asset quality, profitability, capital adequacy, and lending behaviour, assuming that any change in a bank-specific characteristic is induced by endogenous adjustments of the others. The empirical results based on partial adjustment models and two-step system GMM estimation show that bankβs adjustment behaviour is subject to the variation in the macro-financial environment and the stress condition in the global financial market. There is no convincing evidence to support the effectiveness of policy rate cut to boots bank lending and to avoid a financial accelerator effect
Preliminary safety and efficacy of first-line pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and taxane therapy for HER2-positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (PERUSE).
BACKGROUND:
Pertuzumab combined with trastuzumab and docetaxel is the standard first-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer, based on results from the phase III CLEOPATRA trial. PERUSE was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of investigator-selected taxane with pertuzumab and trastuzumab in this setting.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
In the ongoing multicentre single-arm phase IIIb PERUSE study, patients with inoperable HER2-positive advanced breast cancer (locally recurrent/metastatic) (LR/MBC) and no prior systemic therapy for LR/MBC (except endocrine therapy) received docetaxel, paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel with trastuzumab [8\u2009mg/kg loading dose, then 6\u2009mg/kg every 3\u2009weeks (q3w)] and pertuzumab (840\u2009mg loading dose, then 420\u2009mg q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was safety. Secondary end points included overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS:
Overall, 1436 patients received at least one treatment dose (initially docetaxel in 775 patients, paclitaxel in 589, nab-paclitaxel in 65; 7 discontinued before starting taxane). Median age was 54\u2009years; 29% had received prior trastuzumab. Median treatment duration was 16\u2009months for pertuzumab and trastuzumab and 4\u2009months for taxane. Compared with docetaxel-containing therapy, paclitaxel-containing therapy was associated with more neuropathy (all-grade peripheral neuropathy 31% versus 16%) but less febrile neutropenia (1% versus 11%) and mucositis (14% versus 25%). At this preliminary analysis (52 months' median follow-up), median PFS was 20.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.9-22.7] months overall (19.6, 23.0 and 18.1\u2009months with docetaxel, paclitaxel and nab-paclitaxel, respectively). ORR was 80% (95% CI 78%-82%) overall (docetaxel 79%, paclitaxel 83%, nab-paclitaxel 77%).
CONCLUSIONS:
Preliminary findings from PERUSE suggest that the safety and efficacy of first-line pertuzumab, trastuzumab and taxane for HER2-positive LR/MBC are consistent with results from CLEOPATRA. Paclitaxel appears to be a valid alternative taxane backbone to docetaxel, offering similar PFS and ORR with a predictable safety profile.
CLINICALTRIALS.GOV:
NCT01572038
Final results from the PERUSE study of first-line pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus a taxane for HER2-positive locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer, with a multivariable approach to guide prognostication
Background: The phase III CLinical Evaluation Of Pertuzumab And TRAstuzumab (CLEOPATRA) trial established the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab and docetaxel as standard first-line therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC). The multicentre single-arm PERtUzumab global SafEty (PERUSE) study assessed the safety and efficacy of pertuzumab and trastuzumab combined with investigator-selected taxane in this setting. Patients and methods: Eligible patients with inoperable HER2-positive LR/mBC and no prior systemic therapy for LR/mBC (except endocrine therapy) received docetaxel, paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel with trastuzumab and pertuzumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Prespecified subgroup analyses included subgroups according to taxane, hormone receptor (HR) status and prior trastuzumab. Exploratory univariable analyses identified potential prognostic factors; those that remained significant in multivariable analysis were used to analyse PFS and OS in subgroups with all, some or none of these factors. Results: Of 1436 treated patients, 588 (41%) initially received paclitaxel and 918 (64%) had HR-positive disease. The most common grade 653 adverse events were neutropenia (10%, mainly with docetaxel) and diarrhoea (8%). At the final analysis (median follow-up: 5.7 years), median PFS was 20.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.9-23.1] months overall and was similar irrespective of HR status or taxane. Median OS was 65.3 (95% CI 60.9-70.9) months overall. OS was similar regardless of taxane backbone but was more favourable in patients with HR-positive than HR-negative LR/mBC. In exploratory analyses, trastuzumab-pretreated patients with visceral disease had the shortest median PFS (13.1 months) and OS (46.3 months). Conclusions: Mature results from PERUSE show a safety and efficacy profile consistent with results from CLEOPATRA and median OS exceeding 5 years. Results suggest that paclitaxel is a valid alternative to docetaxel as backbone chemotherapy. Exploratory analyses suggest risk factors that could guide future trial design
ΠΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΠΠ Π Π€. ΠΠ΅Ρ Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΡΡΠ±ΡΠΈΠ΄ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ
Β The study explores the influence of internal factors on the level of exports of products of the agro-industrial complexof the Russian Federation (AIC RF). The subject of the research is the competitiveness of export-oriented companies inΒ the agro-industrial complex of the Russian Federation. The relevance of the study is due to the growth of exports of agricultural products, which is gradually becoming one of the most important sources of foreign exchange earnings in the country. The aim of the paper is to form a rating model for Russian companies focused on the export of agricultural products, on the basis of which to propose the most effective measures to support agricultural enterprises. The authors apply the following methods: systematization and classification of information, statistical, coefficient, and regression analysis. Such tools as linear regression models, logistic regression (logit, probit), ordered probit model are considered The authors use the Ginny coefficient (area under the curve Roc) for binomial models and an adjusted R2 for thelinear model as a quality criterion for the model. As a result, the study identified the key internal and external factors affecting the competitiveness of agricultural exporting companies. Internal factors include stocks, net assets, short-term borrowings, equity capital, fixed assets turnover, long-term liabilities, accounts payable. Among the external factors for both ordinal and binomial models, the most significant were the increase in imports, the logarithm of GDP, and the logarithm of GDP per capita. A model of rating assessment of companies has been developed. Proposals are formulated for using the developed system as a simulation model when making decisions on the development and support of food exports in Russia. The authors propose a combined mechanism for supporting enterprises, depending on the rating determined by the model. It is concluded that the implementation of this approach will significantly increase the level of economic efficiency of budget support funds aimed at stimulating exports. The prospect for further research on this topic is to study the influence of qualitative factors that were not included in the model: the drought index, sanctions, and other macroeconomic events and parameters.Β ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π° ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Π°Π³ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ (ΠΠΠ Π Π€). ΠΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΠΠ Π Π€. ΠΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π° ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠΎΠ² ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ° ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡ
ΠΎΠ·ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡΡ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΠΈΠ· Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΎΠ² Π²Π°Π»ΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅. Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ β ΡΡΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ,Β ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π½Π° ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΊΠΎΡ
ΠΎΠ·ΡΠΉΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ, Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΡΡ Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΠΠ. Π Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ: ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΊΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ, ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΡΠΉ Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Ρ. Π Π°ΡΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ, Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠΈ (Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡ), ΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½Π½Π°Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ. ΠΠ°ΠΊ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ ΠΠΆΠΈΠ½ΠΈ (ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ°Π΄Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ Roc-ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΉ) Π΄Π»Ρ Π±ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ R2 Π΄Π»Ρ Π»ΠΈΠ½Π΅ΠΉΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ. Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π²ΡΠ΅ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΡ, ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΊΡΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ β ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΠΠ. Π Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΈΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡΡ: Π·Π°ΠΏΠ°ΡΡ, ΡΠΈΡΡΡΠ΅ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Ρ, ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΊΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΠΈΠΌΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ, ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡΠ°Π», ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π½ΡΡ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ², Π΄ΠΎΠ»Π³ΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΡΠ²Π°, ΠΊΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π·Π°Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ.Β Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΄ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π΄Π»Ρ Π±ΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, Π½Π°ΠΈΠ±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅Β Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΡΡ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ° Π»ΠΎΠ³Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΌ ΠΠΠ, Π»ΠΎΠ³Π°ΡΠΈΡΠΌ ΠΠΠ Π½Π° Π΄ΡΡΡ Π½Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ.Β Π Π°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π° ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠ½Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΠΉ. Π‘ΡΠΎΡΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄Π»ΡΒ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ ΠΎΒ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠ΅ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΡΠ΅Π΄Π»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΉΡΠΈΠ½Π³Π°. Π‘Π΄Π΅Π»Π°Π½ Π²ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΄, ΡΡΠΎΒ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ·Π²ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠΈΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ² Π±ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ, Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Π½Π° ΡΡΠΈΠΌΡΠ»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΊΡΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°.Β ΠΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π° Π΄Π°Π»ΡΠ½Π΅ΠΉΡΠΈΡ
ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΉ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΠΈΡ Π² ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
Β ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ², Π½Π΅ Π²ΠΎΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΠΈΡ
Π² ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Ρ: ΠΈΠ½Π΄Π΅ΠΊΡΠ° Π·Π°ΡΡΡ
ΠΈ, ΡΠ°Π½ΠΊΡΠΈΠΉ, Π΄ΡΡΠ³ΠΈΡ
Β ΠΌΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ².
COLLATERAL DETERMINATS IN BANK RISK MANANAGEMENT: THE REGIONAL CASE
Regional banks are struggling with significant obstacles in the modern Russian economy. Among them are strong competition with major big banks, strong resource restrictions, tightening the Bank of Russiaβs requirements, and quite rapid expansion of financial technologies. Thus, the reduction of regional banks occurs, that produces both a negative impact on the development of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and challenges for balanced competition on the Russian market. Basically, these banks provide the settlement of regionβs social and economic problems while maintaining local companies and enterprises. Β Collateral, as a source for losses covering, became the essential element of credit risk management in banks. Providing lenders to implement such instruments, it helps to reduce bank losses under borrowerβs default. Β The purpose of the article relates to revealing of collateral determinants with higher impact on bank risk with the application of empirical methods (including regional level). This study is based on linear regression models evaluated by the least square method. Private data of secured small and medium business loans is used. Β This article presents LTV (loan-to-value) as a major collateral determinant. The empirical evidence of interlinkage between collateral requirements, by the means of LTV, and risk premium is provided for loan portfolio of Russian regional banks. The hypothesis that LTV conversely correlates with risk premium is statistically proved