4 research outputs found

    The feminine perversion : the woman exists?

    No full text
    Ce travail porte sur d’une part l’interrogation sur l’existence de la perversion fĂ©minine, rarissime voire inexistante d’aprĂšs les Ă©crits fondamentaux de la psychanalyse, et de l’autre part sur l’exploration de la dynamique propre au montage pervers au fĂ©minin. Si la femme qui se situe du cĂŽtĂ© de l’amour a amenĂ© Lacan a Ă©noncĂ© la maxime cĂ©lĂšbre, celle de la femme n’existe pas, puisqu’elle n’est « pas toute » et que la femme ne s’écrit que barrĂ©e, la femme perverse se rĂ©vĂšlera ĂȘtre l’envers de la femme. De ce fait, la femme perverse prĂŽne l’existence de la femme et sa possible Ă©criture. Le montage pervers de la femme perverse bafoue la loi de la diffĂ©rence des sexes en aboutissant Ă  une falsification outranciĂšre des formules de la sexuation. Ainsi, il s’agit d’une perversion fĂ©minine comme imposture. En effet, l’imposture perverse de la femme perverse se dĂ©ploie Ă  travers l’identitĂ© factice que la femme perverse se fabrique afin de contrer l’autre femme, celle qui n’existe pas. D’emblĂ©e, la prĂ©valence imaginaire chez la femme perverse est le mĂ©canisme qui permet Ă  la perverse d’avoir la foi dans la possession d’un phallus, d’une part largement supĂ©rieur Ă  celui de l’homme, puisqu’il n’est pas bornĂ© par la dĂ©tumescence et d’autre part, la relevant au rang de l’exception, puisqu’elle est la seule femme Ă  le dĂ©tenir. La mise en scĂšne perverse, dont l’ancrage est imaginaire, opĂšre dans les filets signifiant du symbolique. En effet, le symbolique, scĂšne de la loi de la diffĂ©rence des sexes, se trouve bafouĂ© et souillĂ©. Ainsi, c’est ce savoir autre, sorte de « sur-savoir », prĂŽnĂ© par la femme perverse qui divise l’autre, -tĂ©moin sidĂ©rĂ©-, et perdure son illusion, sa foi, dans l’avoir du phallus. Toutefois, derriĂšre cette armure d’invincible se rĂ©vĂšle une angoisse Ă  la teinte mĂ©lancolique, connectĂ©e Ă  l’insignifiance du sexe fĂ©minin. Ainsi, c’est ce non-lieu de la femme auquel la femme perverse par imposture et simulacre s’invente un lieu, qui constitue l’angoisse de laquelle la femme perverse se prĂ©munit.This work concerns on one hand the interrogation on the existence of the even non-existent feminine, extremely rare perversion according to the fundamental papers of the psychoanalysis, and somewhere else on the exploration of the dynamics appropriate(peculiar) to the perverse assembly(editing) in the feminine. If the woman who is situated near(on the side of) love brought Lacan expressed the famous maxim, that of the woman do not exist, because she " is not quite " and because the woman spells only blocked, the perverse woman will turn out to be to the woman(wife). Therefore, the perverse woman advocates the existence of the woman and her possible writing. The perverse assembly(editing) of the perverse woman scoffs at the law of the difference of the sexes by ending in an exaggerated forgery of the formulae of her(it) So, it is about a perversion feminine as imposture. Indeed, the perverse imposture of the perverse woman spreads (displays,deploys) through the artificial identity that the perverse woman makes to counter the other woman, the one who does not exist. Straightaway, imaginary prevalence at the perverse woman is the mechanism which allows the pervert to have the faith in the ownership of a phallus, on one hand widely upper to that of the man, because he (it) is not limited by the dĂ©tumescence and on the other hand, raising(finding) it to the rank of the exception, because she is the only woman to hold(detain) him(it). The perverse direction (fabrication), the anchoring of which is imaginary, operates in nets meaning of symbolism. Indeed, symbolism, scene (stage) of the law of the difference of the sexes, is scoffed and soiled. So, it is So, it is this other knowledge, kind of " to know ", lauded by the perverse woman who divides the other one, - the bewildered witness(baton), and continues its illusion, its faith, in the credit note of the phallus. However, behind this armor of invincible shows itself an anxiety in the melancholic tint, connected to the insignificance of the female genital organ. So, it is this dismissal of the charges of the woman in which the perverse woman by imposture and enactment invents a place, which establishes (constitutes) the anxiety of which the perverse woman protects himself

    La perversion féminine : la femme existe?

    Get PDF
    This work concerns on one hand the interrogation on the existence of the even non-existent feminine, extremely rare perversion according to the fundamental papers of the psychoanalysis, and somewhere else on the exploration of the dynamics appropriate(peculiar) to the perverse assembly(editing) in the feminine. If the woman who is situated near(on the side of) love brought Lacan expressed the famous maxim, that of the woman do not exist, because she " is not quite " and because the woman spells only blocked, the perverse woman will turn out to be to the woman(wife). Therefore, the perverse woman advocates the existence of the woman and her possible writing. The perverse assembly(editing) of the perverse woman scoffs at the law of the difference of the sexes by ending in an exaggerated forgery of the formulae of her(it) So, it is about a perversion feminine as imposture. Indeed, the perverse imposture of the perverse woman spreads (displays,deploys) through the artificial identity that the perverse woman makes to counter the other woman, the one who does not exist. Straightaway, imaginary prevalence at the perverse woman is the mechanism which allows the pervert to have the faith in the ownership of a phallus, on one hand widely upper to that of the man, because he (it) is not limited by the dĂ©tumescence and on the other hand, raising(finding) it to the rank of the exception, because she is the only woman to hold(detain) him(it). The perverse direction (fabrication), the anchoring of which is imaginary, operates in nets meaning of symbolism. Indeed, symbolism, scene (stage) of the law of the difference of the sexes, is scoffed and soiled. So, it is So, it is this other knowledge, kind of " to know ", lauded by the perverse woman who divides the other one, - the bewildered witness(baton), and continues its illusion, its faith, in the credit note of the phallus. However, behind this armor of invincible shows itself an anxiety in the melancholic tint, connected to the insignificance of the female genital organ. So, it is this dismissal of the charges of the woman in which the perverse woman by imposture and enactment invents a place, which establishes (constitutes) the anxiety of which the perverse woman protects himself.Ce travail porte sur d’une part l’interrogation sur l’existence de la perversion fĂ©minine, rarissime voire inexistante d’aprĂšs les Ă©crits fondamentaux de la psychanalyse, et de l’autre part sur l’exploration de la dynamique propre au montage pervers au fĂ©minin. Si la femme qui se situe du cĂŽtĂ© de l’amour a amenĂ© Lacan a Ă©noncĂ© la maxime cĂ©lĂšbre, celle de la femme n’existe pas, puisqu’elle n’est « pas toute » et que la femme ne s’écrit que barrĂ©e, la femme perverse se rĂ©vĂšlera ĂȘtre l’envers de la femme. De ce fait, la femme perverse prĂŽne l’existence de la femme et sa possible Ă©criture. Le montage pervers de la femme perverse bafoue la loi de la diffĂ©rence des sexes en aboutissant Ă  une falsification outranciĂšre des formules de la sexuation. Ainsi, il s’agit d’une perversion fĂ©minine comme imposture. En effet, l’imposture perverse de la femme perverse se dĂ©ploie Ă  travers l’identitĂ© factice que la femme perverse se fabrique afin de contrer l’autre femme, celle qui n’existe pas. D’emblĂ©e, la prĂ©valence imaginaire chez la femme perverse est le mĂ©canisme qui permet Ă  la perverse d’avoir la foi dans la possession d’un phallus, d’une part largement supĂ©rieur Ă  celui de l’homme, puisqu’il n’est pas bornĂ© par la dĂ©tumescence et d’autre part, la relevant au rang de l’exception, puisqu’elle est la seule femme Ă  le dĂ©tenir. La mise en scĂšne perverse, dont l’ancrage est imaginaire, opĂšre dans les filets signifiant du symbolique. En effet, le symbolique, scĂšne de la loi de la diffĂ©rence des sexes, se trouve bafouĂ© et souillĂ©. Ainsi, c’est ce savoir autre, sorte de « sur-savoir », prĂŽnĂ© par la femme perverse qui divise l’autre, -tĂ©moin sidĂ©rĂ©-, et perdure son illusion, sa foi, dans l’avoir du phallus. Toutefois, derriĂšre cette armure d’invincible se rĂ©vĂšle une angoisse Ă  la teinte mĂ©lancolique, connectĂ©e Ă  l’insignifiance du sexe fĂ©minin. Ainsi, c’est ce non-lieu de la femme auquel la femme perverse par imposture et simulacre s’invente un lieu, qui constitue l’angoisse de laquelle la femme perverse se prĂ©munit

    La perversion féminine (la femme existe?)

    No full text
    Ce travail porte sur d une part l interrogation sur l existence de la perversion fĂ©minine, rarissime voire inexistante d aprĂšs les Ă©crits fondamentaux de la psychanalyse, et de l autre part sur l exploration de la dynamique propre au montage pervers au fĂ©minin. Si la femme qui se situe du cĂŽtĂ© de l amour a amenĂ© Lacan a Ă©noncĂ© la maxime cĂ©lĂšbre, celle de la femme n existe pas, puisqu elle n est pas toute et que la femme ne s Ă©crit que barrĂ©e, la femme perverse se rĂ©vĂšlera ĂȘtre l envers de la femme. De ce fait, la femme perverse prĂŽne l existence de la femme et sa possible Ă©criture. Le montage pervers de la femme perverse bafoue la loi de la diffĂ©rence des sexes en aboutissant Ă  une falsification outranciĂšre des formules de la sexuation. Ainsi, il s agit d une perversion fĂ©minine comme imposture. En effet, l imposture perverse de la femme perverse se dĂ©ploie Ă  travers l identitĂ© factice que la femme perverse se fabrique afin de contrer l autre femme, celle qui n existe pas. D emblĂ©e, la prĂ©valence imaginaire chez la femme perverse est le mĂ©canisme qui permet Ă  la perverse d avoir la foi dans la possession d un phallus, d une part largement supĂ©rieur Ă  celui de l homme, puisqu il n est pas bornĂ© par la dĂ©tumescence et d autre part, la relevant au rang de l exception, puisqu elle est la seule femme Ă  le dĂ©tenir. La mise en scĂšne perverse, dont l ancrage est imaginaire, opĂšre dans les filets signifiant du symbolique. En effet, le symbolique, scĂšne de la loi de la diffĂ©rence des sexes, se trouve bafouĂ© et souillĂ©. Ainsi, c est ce savoir autre, sorte de sur-savoir , prĂŽnĂ© par la femme perverse qui divise l autre, -tĂ©moin sidĂ©rĂ©-, et perdure son illusion, sa foi, dans l avoir du phallus. Toutefois, derriĂšre cette armure d invincible se rĂ©vĂšle une angoisse Ă  la teinte mĂ©lancolique, connectĂ©e Ă  l insignifiance du sexe fĂ©minin. Ainsi, c est ce non-lieu de la femme auquel la femme perverse par imposture et simulacre s invente un lieu, qui constitue l angoisse de laquelle la femme perverse se prĂ©munit.This work concerns on one hand the interrogation on the existence of the even non-existent feminine, extremely rare perversion according to the fundamental papers of the psychoanalysis, and somewhere else on the exploration of the dynamics appropriate(peculiar) to the perverse assembly(editing) in the feminine. If the woman who is situated near(on the side of) love brought Lacan expressed the famous maxim, that of the woman do not exist, because she " is not quite " and because the woman spells only blocked, the perverse woman will turn out to be to the woman(wife). Therefore, the perverse woman advocates the existence of the woman and her possible writing. The perverse assembly(editing) of the perverse woman scoffs at the law of the difference of the sexes by ending in an exaggerated forgery of the formulae of her(it) So, it is about a perversion feminine as imposture. Indeed, the perverse imposture of the perverse woman spreads (displays,deploys) through the artificial identity that the perverse woman makes to counter the other woman, the one who does not exist. Straightaway, imaginary prevalence at the perverse woman is the mechanism which allows the pervert to have the faith in the ownership of a phallus, on one hand widely upper to that of the man, because he (it) is not limited by the dĂ©tumescence and on the other hand, raising(finding) it to the rank of the exception, because she is the only woman to hold(detain) him(it). The perverse direction (fabrication), the anchoring of which is imaginary, operates in nets meaning of symbolism. Indeed, symbolism, scene (stage) of the law of the difference of the sexes, is scoffed and soiled. So, it is So, it is this other knowledge, kind of " to know ", lauded by the perverse woman who divides the other one, - the bewildered witness(baton), and continues its illusion, its faith, in the credit note of the phallus. However, behind this armor of invincible shows itself an anxiety in the melancholic tint, connected to the insignificance of the female genital organ. So, it is this dismissal of the charges of the woman in which the perverse woman by imposture and enactment invents a place, which establishes (constitutes) the anxiety of which the perverse woman protects himself.NICE-Bibliotheque electronique (060889901) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Clinical and genetic investigation of a large Tunisian family with complete achromatopsia: identification of a new nonsense mutation in GNAT2 gene.

    No full text
    Complete achromatopsia is a rare autosomal recessive disease associated with CNGA3, CNGB3, GNAT2 and PDE6C mutations. This retinal disorder is characterized by complete loss of color discrimination due to the absence or alteration of the cones function. The purpose of the present study was the clinical and the genetic characterization of achromatopsia in a large consanguineous Tunisian family. Ophthalmic evaluation included a full clinical examination, color vision testing and electroretinography. Linkage analysis using microsatellite markers flanking CNGA3, CNGB3, GNAT2 and PDE6C genes was performed. Mutations were screened by direct sequencing. A total of 12 individuals were diagnosed with congenital complete achromatopsia. They are members of six nuclear consanguineous families belonging to the same large consanguineous family. Linkage analysis revealed linkage to GNAT2. Mutational screening of GNAT2 revealed three intronic variations c.119-69G>C, c.161+66A>T and c.875-31G>C that co-segregated with a novel mutation p.R313X. An identical GNAT2 haplotype segregating with this mutation was identified, indicating a founder mutation. All patients were homozygous for the p.R313X mutation. This is the first report of the clinical and genetic investigation of complete achromatopsia in North Africa and the largest family with recessive achromatopsia involving GNAT2; thus, providing a unique opportunity for genotype-phenotype correlation for this extremely rare condition
    corecore