Dihydrodinophysistoxin-1 Produced by Dinophysis norvegica in the Gulf of Maine, USA and Its Accumulation in Shellfish

Dihydrodinophysistoxin-1 (dihydro-DTX1, (M-H)−m/z 819.5), described previously from a marine sponge but never identified as to its biological source or described in shellfish, was detected in multiple species of commercial shellfish collected from the central coast of the Gulf of Maine, USA in 2016 and in 2018 during blooms of the dinoflagellate Dinophysis norvegica. Toxin screening by protein phosphatase inhibition (PPIA) first detected the presence of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning-like bioactivity; however, confirmatory analysis using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) failed to detect okadaic acid (OA, (M-H)−m/z 803.5), dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX1, (M-H)−m/z 817.5), or dinophysistoxin-2 (DTX2, (M-H)−m/z 803.5) in samples collected during the bloom. Bioactivity-guided fractionation followed by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) tentatively identified dihydro-DTX1 in the PPIA active fraction. LC-MS/MS measurements showed an absence of OA, DTX1, and DTX2, but confirmed the presence of dihydro-DTX1 in shellfish during blooms of D. norvegica in both years, with results correlating well with PPIA testing. Two laboratory cultures of D. norvegica isolated from the 2018 bloom were found to produce dihydro-DTX1 as the sole DSP toxin, confirming the source of this compound in shellfish. Estimated concentrations of dihydro-DTX1 were \u3e0.16 ppm in multiple shellfish species (max. 1.1 ppm) during the blooms in 2016 and 2018. Assuming an equivalent potency and molar response to DTX1, the authority initiated precautionary shellfish harvesting closures in both years. To date, no illnesses have been associated with the presence of dihydro-DTX1 in shellfish in the Gulf of Maine region and studies are underway to determine the potency of this new toxin relative to the currently regulated DSP toxins in order to develop appropriate management guidance

Dihydrodinophysistoxin-1 produced by Dinophysis norvegica in the Gulf of Maine, USA and its accumulation in shellfish

© The Author(s), 2020. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Deeds, J. R., Stutts, W. L., Celiz, M. D., MacLeod, J., Hamilton, A. E., Lewis, B. J., Miller, D. W., Kanwit, K., Smith, J. L., Kulis, D. M., McCarron, P., Rauschenberg, C. D., Burnell, C. A., Archer, S. D., Borchert, J., & Lankford, S. K. Dihydrodinophysistoxin-1 produced by Dinophysis norvegica in the Gulf of Maine, USA and its accumulation in shellfish. Toxins, 12(9), (2020): E533, doi:10.3390/toxins12090533.Dihydrodinophysistoxin-1 (dihydro-DTX1, (M-H)−m/z 819.5), described previously from a marine sponge but never identified as to its biological source or described in shellfish, was detected in multiple species of commercial shellfish collected from the central coast of the Gulf of Maine, USA in 2016 and in 2018 during blooms of the dinoflagellate Dinophysis norvegica. Toxin screening by protein phosphatase inhibition (PPIA) first detected the presence of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning-like bioactivity; however, confirmatory analysis using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) failed to detect okadaic acid (OA, (M-H)−m/z 803.5), dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX1, (M-H)−m/z 817.5), or dinophysistoxin-2 (DTX2, (M-H)−m/z 803.5) in samples collected during the bloom. Bioactivity-guided fractionation followed by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) tentatively identified dihydro-DTX1 in the PPIA active fraction. LC-MS/MS measurements showed an absence of OA, DTX1, and DTX2, but confirmed the presence of dihydro-DTX1 in shellfish during blooms of D. norvegica in both years, with results correlating well with PPIA testing. Two laboratory cultures of D. norvegica isolated from the 2018 bloom were found to produce dihydro-DTX1 as the sole DSP toxin, confirming the source of this compound in shellfish. Estimated concentrations of dihydro-DTX1 were >0.16 ppm in multiple shellfish species (max. 1.1 ppm) during the blooms in 2016 and 2018. Assuming an equivalent potency and molar response to DTX1, the authority initiated precautionary shellfish harvesting closures in both years. To date, no illnesses have been associated with the presence of dihydro-DTX1 in shellfish in the Gulf of Maine region and studies are underway to determine the potency of this new toxin relative to the currently regulated DSP toxins in order to develop appropriate management guidance.Partial support for this research was received from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science Competitive Research, Ecology and Oceanography of Harmful Algal Blooms Program under awards NA17NOS4780184 and NA19NOS4780182 to Juliette Smith (VIMS) and Jonathan Deeds (US FDA), and Prevention, Control, and Mitigation of Harmful Algal Blooms program award NA17NOS4780179 to Stephen Archer. This paper is ECOHAB publication number EC0956

Stock Intermixing and Movement of Atlantic Herring (\u3cem\u3eClupea Harengus\u3c/em\u3e) In the Gulf of Maine and Southern New England

Almost 40,000 Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) were tagged in the Gulf of Maine and Southern New England between 2003 and 2004. This study was conducted in order to collect information on the current stock intermixing and migration patterns for Atlantic herring throughout their range. Management of the Atlantic herring US coastal stock complex depends on determining Total Allowable Catch allocations through an understanding of intermixing rates and migration patterns. The last tagging project in US waters ended in the early 1980\u27s before the fishery shifted to using mobile gear offshore and the Georges Bank stock component recovered. Therefore, a new study was warranted so the assumptions of stock intermixing and migration patterns integrated into the management regime could be validated or redefined. Fish were tagged and released in the Gulf of Maine during the summer feeding/spawning period and in Southern New England during the winter feeding period. One hundred fifteen fish were recovered from the five defined spatial strata (Southern New England, Georges Bank, Gulf of Maine, Nova Scotia and New Brunswick) during the two years of this study. A significant portion of these recoveries represented long-distance migrations and extended times at large. Because recoveries were solely dependant on the commercial fishery, a major focus of the analyses for this study was developing an adjustment factor to weight tag returns by catch and effort. The adjusted returns were then used to describe proportional movements between spatial strata. Results from this study indicate that the majority of herring released in the Gulf of Maine either remained or returned to the same area. However, an appreciable percentage of herring (average, 13.5%) released in the Gulf of Maine were recovered in the Southern New England winter fishery and surprisingly in Nova Scotia (average 8%) during the summer fishery. Fish released in Southern New England were primarily recovered in the Gulf of Maine (66%), while approximately 14% were recovered in the same area of release (Southern New England) and in Nova Scotia. These results are important for two reasons, first they show that tagging herring in the context of an offshore fishery pursued by mobile gear is possible and second, that fish are moving in measurable numbers to and from Nova Scotia. Results from this study could have implications for the stock assessment and management of this species. A comprehensive tagging program should be initiated in order to mark hening in proportion to their abundance and distribution. Results from such a program could be used to quantify rather than just describe possible stock intermixing and define persistent migration patterns