33 research outputs found

    Fetal skin as a pro-inflammatory organ: Evidence from a primate model of chorioamnionitis.

    Get PDF
    BackgroundIntrauterine infection is a primary cause of preterm birth and fetal injury. The pro-inflammatory role of the fetal skin in the setting of intrauterine infection remains poorly characterized. Whether or not inflammation of the fetal skin occurs in primates remains unstudied. Accordingly, we hypothesized that: i) the fetal primate skin would mount a pro-inflammatory response to preterm birth associated pro-inflammatory agents (lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia coli, live Ureaplasma parvum, interleukin-1β) and; ii) that inhibiting interleukin-1 signaling would decrease the skin inflammatory response.MethodsRhesus macaques with singleton pregnancies received intraamniotic injections of either sterile saline (control) or one of three pro-inflammatory agonists: E. coli lipopolysaccharides, interluekin-1β or live U. parvum under ultrasound guidance. A fourth group of animals received both E. coli lipopolysaccharide and interleukin-1 signaling inhibitor interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (Anakinra) prior to delivery. Animals were surgically delivered at approximately 130 days' gestational age.ResultsIntraamniotic lipopolysaccharide caused an inflammatory skin response characterized by increases in interluekin-1β,-6 and -8 mRNA at 16 hours. There was a modest inflammatory response to U. parvum, but interleukin-1β alone caused no inflammatory response in the fetal skin. Intraamniotic Anakinra treatment of lipopolysaccharide-exposed animals significantly reduced skin inflammation.ConclusionsIntraamniotic lipopolysaccharide and U. parvum were associated with modest increases in the expression of inflammatory mediators in primate fetal skin. Although administration of Interleukin-1β alone did not elicit an inflammatory response, lipopolysaccharide-driven skin inflammation was decreased following intraamniotic Anakinra therapy. These findings provide support for the role of the fetal skin in the development of the fetal inflammatory response

    Oral, nasal and pharyngeal exposure to lipopolysaccharide causes a fetal inflammatory response in sheep.

    Get PDF
    BackgroundA fetal inflammatory response (FIR) in sheep can be induced by intraamniotic or selective exposure of the fetal lung or gut to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). The oral, nasal, and pharyngeal cavities (ONP) contain lymphoid tissue and epithelium that are in contact with the amniotic fluid. The ability of the ONP epithelium and lymphoid tissue to initiate a FIR is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine if FIR occurs after selective ONP exposure to LPS in fetal sheep.MethodsUsing fetal recovery surgery, we isolated ONP from the fetal lung, GI tract, and amniotic fluid by tracheal and esophageal ligation and with an occlusive glove fitted over the snout. LPS (5 mg) or saline was infused with 24 h Alzet pumps secured in the oral cavity (n = 7-8/group). Animals were delivered 1 or 6 days after initiation of the LPS or saline infusions.ResultsThe ONP exposure to LPS had time-dependent systemic inflammatory effects with changes in WBC in cord blood, an increase in posterior mediastinal lymph node weight at 6 days, and pro-inflammatory mRNA responses in the fetal plasma, lung, and liver. Compared to controls, the expression of surfactant protein A mRNA increased 1 and 6 days after ONP exposure to LPS.ConclusionONP exposure to LPS alone can induce a mild FIR with time-dependent inflammatory responses in remote fetal tissues not directly exposed to LPS

    Fetal skin as a pro-inflammatory organ: Evidence from a primate model of chorioamnionitis.

    No full text
    Intrauterine infection is a primary cause of preterm birth and fetal injury. The pro-inflammatory role of the fetal skin in the setting of intrauterine infection remains poorly characterized. Whether or not inflammation of the fetal skin occurs in primates remains unstudied. Accordingly, we hypothesized that: i) the fetal primate skin would mount a pro-inflammatory response to preterm birth associated pro-inflammatory agents (lipopolysaccharides from Escherichia coli, live Ureaplasma parvum, interleukin-1β) and; ii) that inhibiting interleukin-1 signaling would decrease the skin inflammatory response.Rhesus macaques with singleton pregnancies received intraamniotic injections of either sterile saline (control) or one of three pro-inflammatory agonists: E. coli lipopolysaccharides, interluekin-1β or live U. parvum under ultrasound guidance. A fourth group of animals received both E. coli lipopolysaccharide and interleukin-1 signaling inhibitor interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (Anakinra) prior to delivery. Animals were surgically delivered at approximately 130 days' gestational age.Intraamniotic lipopolysaccharide caused an inflammatory skin response characterized by increases in interluekin-1β,-6 and -8 mRNA at 16 hours. There was a modest inflammatory response to U. parvum, but interleukin-1β alone caused no inflammatory response in the fetal skin. Intraamniotic Anakinra treatment of lipopolysaccharide-exposed animals significantly reduced skin inflammation.Intraamniotic lipopolysaccharide and U. parvum were associated with modest increases in the expression of inflammatory mediators in primate fetal skin. Although administration of Interleukin-1β alone did not elicit an inflammatory response, lipopolysaccharide-driven skin inflammation was decreased following intraamniotic Anakinra therapy. These findings provide support for the role of the fetal skin in the development of the fetal inflammatory response

    Pancytokeratin expression.

    No full text
    <p>Representative photomicrographs for pancytokeratin (1:2500) immunohistochemical staining of fetal skin. (A) control; (B) LPS at 16 h; (C) LPS and IL-1ra at 16 h exposure. (D) Graph shows the comparison between groups in the percent of positive cells of different intensity stain; intense (arrow), moderate and no stain (magnification bar represents 20 μm). <b>*</b>indicates a significant difference in the percent of positive cell between LPS at 16 hours and untreated control group. ɸ indicates a significant difference in the percent of positive cell between LPS group and LPS plus IL-1ra group at 16 hours.</p

    IL-6 expression.

    No full text
    <p>Representative photomicrographs for IL-6 (1:400) immunohistochemical staining of fetal skin. (A) control; (B) LPS at 16 h; (C) LPS and IL-1ra at 16 h exposure. (D) The number of positive cells (arrow), that were counted between groups. (magnification bar represents 20 μm). <b>*</b>indicates a significant increase in the number of positive cells relative to the untreated control. ɸ indicates a significant decrease in number of positive cells relative to LPS.</p

    Cytokine PCR Analysis.

    No full text
    <p>Quantitative PCR analysis of cytokines in fetal rhesus macaque skin following intra-amniotic exposure with LPS, IL-1β or UP and for different times of exposure (Panel a, b and c). Cytokine expression for LPS and LPS plus IL-1ra exposure groups (Panel d, e and f). Graphs represent mean mRNA fold change ± SD. <b>*</b>indicates a significant increase in transcript expression relative to untreated control group normalized to a value for 1.0. ɸ indicates a significant decrease in transcript expression relative to LPS at 16 hours.</p
    corecore