7,900 research outputs found
Algebraic tori revisited
Let be a finite Galois extension and \pi = \fn{Gal}(K/k). An
algebraic torus defined over is called a -torus if
T\times_{\fn{Spec}(k)} \fn{Spec}(K)\simeq \bm{G}_{m,K}^n for some integer
. The set of all algebraic -tori defined over under the stably
isomorphism form a semigroup, denoted by . We will give a complete
proof of the following theorem due to Endo and Miyata \cite{EM5}. Theorem. Let
be a finite group. Then where
is a maximal -order in containing
and is the locally free class group of
, provided that is isomorphic to the following four
types of groups : ( is any positive integer), ( is any odd
integer ), ( is any odd integer , is
an odd prime number not dividing , , and
for any prime divisor
of ), ( is any odd integer , for any
prime divisor of ).Comment: To appear in Asian J. Math. ; the title is change
{Twisted Poincar\'e Series and Geometric Factorization of Affine Weyl Groups
We study the relation between the alternating product of twisted Poincar'e
series of parabolic subgroups of affine Weyl groups and hyperbolic stabilizers
of geodesic tubes. Moreover, from such relation, we find a length-preserving
factorization of affine Weyl groups of type and
Retract Rational Fields
Let be an infinite field. The notion of retract -rationality was
introduced by Saltman in the study of Noether's problem and other rationality
problems. We will investigate the retract rationality of a field in this paper.
Theorem 1. Let be fields. If is retract -rational
and is retract -rational, then is retract -rational. Theorem 2.
For any finite group containing an abelian normal subgroup such that
is a cyclic group, for any complex representation , the
fixed field is retract -rational. Theorem 3. If is a
finite group, then all the Sylow subgroups of are cyclic if and only if
is retract -rational for all -lattices ,
for all short exact sequences . Because the unramified Brauer group of a retract
-rational field is trivial, Theorem 2 and Theorem 3 generalize previous
results of Bogomolov and Barge respectively (see Theorem \ref{t5.9} and Theorem
\ref{t6.1}).Comment: Several typos in the previous version were correcte
- β¦