A second isoform of 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase found in Caenorhabditis elegans, which is similar to sterol carrier protein x but lacks the sequence of sterol carrier protein 2

We cloned a full-length cDNA of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans that encodes a 44-kDa protein (P-44, 412 residues) similar to sterol carrier protein x (SCPx). Mammalian SCPx is a bipartite protein: its 404-residue N-terminal and 143-residue C-terminal domains are similar to 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase and identical to the precursor of sterol carrier protein 2 (SCP2; also termed non-specific lipid-transfer protein), respectively. P-44 has 56(null)equence identity to the thiolase domain of SCx but lacks the SCP2 sequence. Northern blot analysis revealed only a single mRNA species of 1.4 kb, which agrees well with the length of the cDNA (1371 bp), making it improbable that alternative splicing produces an SCPx-like fusion protein. The sequence similarities of P-44 to conventional thiolases are lesser than that to SCPx. Purified recombinant P-44 cleaved long-chain 3-ketoacyl-CoAs (C8-16) in a thiolytic manner by the ping-pong bi-bi reaction mechanism. The inhibition of P-44 by acetyl-CoA was competitive with CoA and non-competitive with 3-ketooctanoyl-CoA. This pattern of inhibition is shared with SCPx but not with conventional 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase, which is inhibited uncompetitively with respect to 3-ketoacyl CoA. From these results, we concluded that nematode P-44 and mammalian SCPx constitute a second isoform of thiolase, which we propose to term type-II 3-ketoacyl-CoA thiolase

O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase protein expression by immunohistochemistry in brain and non-brain systemic tumours: systematic review and meta-analysis of correlation with methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction

Background: The DNA repair protein O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) confers resistance to alkylating agents. Several methods have been applied to its analysis, with methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) the most commonly used for promoter methylation study, while immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become the most frequently used for the detection of MGMT protein expression. Agreement on the best and most reliable technique for evaluating MGMT status remains unsettled. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the correlation between IHC and MSP. Methods A computer-aided search of MEDLINE (1950-October 2009), EBSCO (1966-October 2009) and EMBASE (1974-October 2009) was performed for relevant publications. Studies meeting inclusion criteria were those comparing MGMT protein expression by IHC with MGMT promoter methylation by MSP in the same cohort of patients. Methodological quality was assessed by using the QUADAS and STARD instruments. Previously published guidelines were followed for meta-analysis performance. Results Of 254 studies identified as eligible for full-text review, 52 (20.5%) met the inclusion criteria. The review showed that results of MGMT protein expression by IHC are not in close agreement with those obtained with MSP. Moreover, type of tumour (primary brain tumour vs others) was an independent covariate of accuracy estimates in the meta-regression analysis beyond the cut-off value. Conclusions Protein expression assessed by IHC alone fails to reflect the promoter methylation status of MGMT. Thus, in attempts at clinical diagnosis the two methods seem to select different groups of patients and should not be used interchangeably

Experimental concepts for toxicity prevention and tissue restoration after central nervous system irradiation

Several experimental strategies of radiation-induced central nervous system toxicity prevention have recently resulted in encouraging data. The present review summarizes the background for this research and the treatment results. It extends to the perspectives of tissue regeneration strategies, based for example on stem and progenitor cells. Preliminary data suggest a scenario with individually tailored strategies where patients with certain types of comorbidity, resulting in impaired regeneration reserve capacity, might be considered for toxicity prevention, while others might be "salvaged" by delayed interventions that circumvent the problem of normal tissue specificity. Given the complexity of radiation-induced changes, single target interventions might not suffice. Future interventions might vary with patient age, elapsed time from radiotherapy and toxicity type. Potential components include several drugs that interact with neurodegeneration, cell transplantation (into the CNS itself, the blood stream, or both) and creation of reparative signals and a permissive microenvironment, e.g., for cell homing. Without manipulation of the stem cell niche either by cell transfection or addition of appropriate chemokines and growth factors and by providing normal perfusion of the affected region, durable success of such cell-based approaches is hard to imagine