2 research outputs found
âDonât confuse me with factsââhow right wing populism affects trust in agencies advocating anthropogenic climate change as a reality
Everyday public denial of anthropogenically caused climate change (ACC) has complex antecedents and exists on both individual and institutional levels. Earlier research has linked ACC denial to opposition to formal science and elites, perceived threats to the industrialist capitalist order and existing system properties. Research also suggest that trust in public organizations is a key factor in determining support or opposition to climate change policies. In this paper, we explore the possibility that right wing populism and anti-elitist attitudes fuel both ACC denial and low trust in environmental institutions. We surveyed a representative sample of Norwegians (N = 3032) to measure ACC denial, how denial is linked to socio-demographic characteristics, trust in environmental institutions, attitudes toward elites and immigration, as well as environmental attitude orientations. Results show that lack of trust in environmental institutions is strongly associated with ACC denial, and furthermore that the degree of trustâor lack thereofâis partly a function of anti-elitist attitudes, opposition to migration and views of nature
Cool dudes in Norway: climate change denial among conservative Norwegian men
In their article âCool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United Statesâ the authors state: âClearly the extent to which the conservative white male effect on climate change denial exists outside the US is a topic deserving investigation.â Following this recommendation, we report results from a study in Norway. McCright and Dunlap argue that climate change denial can be understood as an expression of protecting group identity and justifying a societal system that provides desired benefits. Our findings resemble those in the US study. A total of 63 per cent of conservative males in Norway do not believe in anthropogenic climate change, as opposed to 36 per cent among the rest of the population who deny climate change and global warming. Expanding on the US study, we investigate whether conservative males more often hold what we term xenosceptic views, and if that adds to the âcool dude-effectâ.1 Multivariate logistic regression models reveal strong effects from a variable measuring âxenosceptic cool dudesâ. Interpreting xenoscepticism as a rough proxy for right leaning views, climate change denial in Norway seems to merge with broader patterns of right-wing nationalism