16 research outputs found

    Management of 150 flail chest injuries: analysis of risk factors affecting outcome

    Get PDF
    Abstract Objective: Flail chest continues to be an important injury with significant complications. The records of 150 patients presenting with flail chest injury were reviewed to determine risk factors affecting morbidity and mortality. Material and method: During a 7-year period 150 patients with a flail chest injury were admitted to our trauma center. There were 111 men (74%) and 39 women (26%) ranging in age from 18 to 88 years with a mean age of 56.9. Only 66 (44%) had an isolated flail chest injury on admission. The majority of patients were older than 55 years (n ¼ 89; 59.3%), 80 (53.3%) presented with an hemo-, or/and pneumothorax, 36 (24%) sustained a head injury and 25 (16.7%) needed ICU monitoring. The mean ISS score was 38. Age, concomitant diseases, presence of pneumothorax and/or hemothorax, Severity Score (ISS), the need for mechanical support, length of stay and deaths were evaluated by using the t-test and x 2 test where appropriate. Results: Sixty-seven patients (44.6%) were conservatively treated, while 80 (53.3%) needed thoracic drainage. Only in 6 cases (4%) thoracotomy was required, while in 9 (6%) laparotomy was performed. Mortality rate reached 5.3%. The main factors correlated with an adverse outcome were: ISS and the presence of associated injuries, while age, hemopneumothorax and mechanical support affected the length of hospitalization but not the mortality. Conclusions: (1) Age and hemopneumothorax did not affect mortality. (2) ISS was found to a strong predictor on outcome concerning morbidity and prolonged hospitalization but did not influence mortality rate. (3) Mechanical support was not considered a necessity for the treatment of flail chest.

    EACTS expert consensus statement for surgical management of pleural empyema

    Get PDF
    Pleural infection is a frequent clinical condition. Prompt treatment has been shown to reduce hospital costs, morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in treatment have been variably implemented in clinical practice. This statement reviews the latest developments and concepts to improve clinical management and stimulate further research. The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) Thoracic Domain and the EACTS Pleural Diseases Working Group established a team of thoracic surgeons to produce a comprehensive review of available scientific evidence with the aim to cover all aspects of surgical practice related to its treatment, in particular focusing on: surgical treatment of empyema in adults; surgical treatment of empyema in children; and surgical treatment of post-pneumonectomy empyema (PPE). In the management of Stage 1 empyema, prompt pleural space chest tube drainage is required. In patients with Stage 2 or 3 empyema who are fit enough to undergo an operative procedure, there is a demonstrated benefit of surgical debridement or decortication [possibly by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)] over tube thoracostomy alone in terms of treatment success and reduction in hospital stay. In children, a primary operative approach is an effective management strategy, associated with a lower mortality rate and a reduction of tube thoracostomy duration, length of antibiotic therapy, reintervention rate and hospital stay. Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy is a reasonable alternative to primary operative management. Uncomplicated PPE [without bronchopleural fistula (BPF)] can be effectively managed with minimally invasive techniques, including fenestration, pleural space irrigation and VATS debridement. PPE associated with BPF can be effectively managed with individualized open surgical techniques, including direct repair, myoplastic and thoracoplastic techniques. Intrathoracic vacuum-assisted closure may be considered as an adjunct to the standard treatment. The current literature cements the role of VATS in the management of pleural empyema, even if the choice of surgical approach relies on the individual surgeon's preferenc

    Diaphragm and transdiaphragmatic injuries.

    Get PDF
    The incidence of traumatic diaphragmatic rupture (TDR) is around 0.5% of all trauma patients, located more frequently on the left side (80%), with penetrating trauma being more predominantly the cause (63%) than blunt injuries (37%). TDR typically develops during thoracoabdominal injuries and outcome depends on the severity of the associated organ lesion. Diagnosis is sometimes very difficult: chest X-ray can verify TDR in only 25-70% of cases, although the specificity of a multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is 100% and 83% for left and right-sided ruptures, respectively. When TDR is a part of a polytrauma, the management of the patient must follow the ATLS (Advanced Trauma Life Support) protocol and surgery is rarely based on the primary survey. The usual scenario involves cases detected during the secondary survey. In acute cases approach is determined by the site of the life-threatening injuries. In the daily surgical routine, in cases of acute TDR, laparotomy provides the best approach to manage the associated abdominal injuries and diaphragmatic rupture. Alternatively a transthoracic approach offer access to reconstruction in cases of delayed. A transdiaphragmatic procedure is offered when during an exploration (laparotomy or thoracotomy), any sign of an injury (bleeding, perforation) is verified through the rupture of the diaphragm in the other cavity (abdomen or chest and vice versa): the injury via a transdiaphragmatic way can be managed. Usually, a simple and small rupture up to 5-6 cm can be reconstructed with No. 0 or 1 monofilament non-absorbable or absorbable interrupted sutures, while for larger defects, interrupted figure-of-eight or horizontal mattress sutures are required. Mesh prosthesis is rarely needed

    A Giant Intrathoracic Malignant Schwannoma Causing Respiratory Failure in a Patient without von Recklinghausen’s Disease

    No full text
    We report an unusual case of a thoracic opacity due to a huge mediastinal malignant schwannoma which compressed the whole left lung and the mediastinum causing respiratory failure in a 73-year-old woman without von Recklinghausen’s disease. Although the tumor was resected, the patient failed to wean from mechanical ventilation and died one month later because of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
    corecore