7 research outputs found

    Research stations as conservation instruments provide long-term community benefits through social connections

    Get PDF
    The paper considers the benefits accruing from field research stations and how they might promote community-park relationships. In Kibale National Park (Uganda), study findings show that the presence of the research station provides long-term direct employment for 52 people, and indirect, cascading benefits for up to 720 people several kilometers away. While benefits of the research station do not eliminate community-park conflict, the long-term presence of researchers and the gains to local people associated with them is an underappreciated and important means for integrating the goals of biodiversity protection and local community investment. Benefits such as healthcare and education are also linked.Canada Research Chairs Program,Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada,Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesRathlyn Fieldwork Award,the National Geographic Society

    Wildlife and spiritual knowledge at the edge of protected areas: raising another voice in conservation

    Get PDF
    International audienceInternational guidelines recommend the integration of local communities within protected areas management as a means to improve conservation efforts. However, local management plans rarely consider communities knowledge about wildlife and their traditions to promote biodiversity conservation. In the Sebitoli area of Kibale National Park, Uganda, the contact of local communities with wildlife has been strictly limited at least since the establishment of the park in 1993. The park has not develop programs, outside of touristic sites, to promote local traditions, knowledge, and beliefs in order to link neighboring community members to nature. To investigate such links, we used a combination of semi­directed interviews and participative observations (N= 31) with three communities. While human and wildlife territories are legally disjointed, results show that traditional wildlife and spiritual related knowledge trespasses them and the contact with nature is maintained though practice, culture, and imagination. More than 66% of the people we interviewed have wild animals as totems, and continue to use plants to medicate, cook, or build. Five spirits structure human­wildlife relationships at specific sacred sites. However, this knowledge varies as a function of the location of local communities and the sacred sites. A better integration of local wildlife­friendly knowledge into management plans may revive communities' connectedness to nature, motivate conservation behaviors, and promote biodiversity conservation

    Illegal Harvesting within a Protected Area: Spatial Distribution of Activities, Social Drivers of Wild Meat Consumption, and Wildlife Conservation

    No full text
    International audienceThe African tropical forests host an inestimable number of resources, including food,medicine, vegetal and animal species. Among them, chimpanzees are threatened with extinction byhuman activities affecting their habitats, such as forest product harvesting, and/or more directly,snaring and trafficking. We aimed to better understand the spatial distribution of these illegalactivities, and the reasons for setting snares and consuming wild meat in an agricultural landscape(subsistence farming and cash crops) densely populated near a protected area (Sebitoli, Northernpart of Kibale National Park, Uganda). To carry out this study, we combined GPS records of illegalactivities collected with group counts (in total, n = 339 tea workers, 678 villagers, and 1885 children)and individual interviews (n = 74 tea workers, 42 villagers, and 35 children). A quarter of illegalactivities collected (n = 1661) targeted animal resources and about 60% were recorded in specific areas(southwest and northeast) of the Sebitoli chimpanzee home range. Wild meat consumption, which isillegal in Uganda, is a relatively common practice among participants (17.1% to 54.1% of respondentsdepending on actor types and census methods). However, consumers declared that they eat wildmeat unfrequently (0.6 to 2.8 times per year). Being a young man coming from districts contiguousto Kibale National Park particularly raises the odds of consuming wild meat. Such an analysiscontributes to the understanding of wild meat hunting among traditional rural and agriculturalsocieties from East Africa
    corecore