Ice thikness measurement on glaciers in Suntar Khayata, Eastern Siberia (A preliminary result)

第3回極域科学シンポジウム/特別セッション「これからの北極研究」11月28日（水） 国立極地研究所 2階大会議

Eosinophilic pleural effusion due to lung cancer has a better prognosis than non-eosinophilic malignant pleural effusion

Objective Tumor-related eosinophilia may have extended survival benefits for some cancer patients. However, there has been no report on the prognosis difference between eosinophilic pleural effusion (EPE) and non-EPE in lung cancer patients. Our study aimed to investigate the prognosis difference between EPE and non-EPE due to lung cancer. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with lung cancer who presented with malignant pleural effusion (MPE) between May 2007 and September 2020 at the National Hospital Organization Kochi Hospital. EPE is defined as pleural fluid with a nucleated cell count containing 10% or more eosinophils. Results A total of 152 patients were included: 89 were male (59%). The median age was 74.4 years (range 37–101), and all patients were pathologically shown to have MPE. Most patients (140; 92%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) of 0/1. Twenty patients had EPE. The median overall survival (OS) of all 152 lung cancer patients with MPE was 298 days. The median OS of the patients with EPE was 766 days, and the median OS of the patients with non-EPE was 252 days. Kaplan–Meier univariate analysis showed that lung cancer patients with EPE had a significantly better prognosis than patients with non-EPE (P < 0.05). Cox proportional regression analysis showed that EPE, ECOG PS, sex, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the serum (sNLR) may be independent prognostic factors affecting survival in patients with MPE. Conclusion Lung cancer patients with EPE have a better prognosis than those with non-EPE

Late-onset acute type 1 diabetes mellitus 7 months after discontinuation of pembrolizumab against lung cancer

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occur in rare cases, even after the completion of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. We encountered a lung cancer patient diagnosed with acute-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM) 7 months after the cessation of ICI. A 68-year old woman was referred to our hospital for chest abnormalities. She was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma cT4N2M1c, stage IVB. Immunostaining showed that the expression of programmed death ligand 1 in tumor cells was negative. A genetic analysis using the Oncomine Dx Target Test Multi-CDx System revealed that the primary tumor was positive for ERBB2. Combined immunotherapy with carboplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab was performed as first-line therapy, followed by maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus pembrolizumab, which was successful. After the seventh course, maintenance therapy was stopped because only the primary tumor showed local enlargement. Local chest radiotherapy (66 Gy/33 Fr) was performed, and the patient was followed up. HbA1c was 4.9% 3 months after the completion of pembrolizumab, and dry mouth and polyuria occurred after 5 months. Seven months later, the patient developed diabetic ketoacidosis with a blood glucose of 348 mg/dL and an HbA1c of 11.3%. Antiglutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies were negative and urinary C-peptide was 9.3 μg/day. The patient was diagnosed with acute-onset type 1 diabetes and received insulin therapy. There has been no case report of type 1 diabetes diagnosed 7 months after the last administration of an ICI. These results indicate that irAE needs to be considered even after the cessation of ICI

Non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR (L858R and E709X) and CNNB1 mutations responded to afatinib

Lung cancer with complex epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and CTNNB1 comutations is rare, and the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is generally poor. Here, we encountered a lung cancer patient with complex EGFR (L858R and E709X) and CTNNB1 comutations who successfully responded to afatinib. A 78-year-old woman visited our hospital with a cough and bloody sputum that had worsened over the past year. She had multiple mass shadows in both lungs and nodular shadows in the bronchi. The patient was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma cT4N3M1c stage IVB. A genetic analysis of the primary tumor using the Oncomine Dx target test multi-CDx system revealed positivity for EGFR (L858R and E709X) and CTNNB1 mutations. The expression of programmed death ligand 1 (22C3 clones) in tumor cells was negative by immunostaining. The patient was treated with afatinib as first-line therapy and achieved clinical improvement and a partial response and is continuing treatment 1 year later. Case reports of lung cancer patients with EGFR/CTNNB1 comutations are rare, and TKIs are not considered to be effective. We herein present the first case report of lung cancer with the co-occurrence of uncommon and complex EGFR (L858R and E709X) and CTNNB1 mutations that was successfully treated with afatinib

A single dose of pembrolizumab treatment causing a profound and durable response in lung cancer

Profound and durable responses to a single dose of pembrolizumab in lung cancer are rare. We encountered a non-small cell lung cancer patient showing a deep and durable response with a single dose of pembrolizumab. A 79-year-old man reported bloody sputum for several weeks and visited a general physician. A chest x-ray revealed a tumor shadow in the right middle lung field at that time, and the patient was referred to our hospital. He was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the lung by transbronchial biopsy. The expression of programmed death ligand 1 in tumor cells was 100% by immunostaining. Based on the above, immunotherapy with pembrolizumab was performed as first-line therapy. Cancer cells had significantly shrunk at the end of the first cycle. The patient had grade-3 immune-related hepatitis at the end of the first cycle. Pembrolizumab treatment was stopped and prednisolone (80 mg/body) was initiated. Subsequently, liver function normalized, and prednisolone was tapered and discontinued. Since then, no tumor recurrence has been detected for 1.5 years without treatment. There have been few reports of profound and durable responses to a single dose of pembrolizumab in lung cancer. The results indicate that a single dose of pembrolizumab alone may be sufficient to cause durable response and serious immune-related adverse events in some cases