Scoring system to facilitate diagnosis of Gaucher disease

Background: Gaucher disease (GD) manifests heterogeneously and other conditions are often misdiagnosed in its place, leading to diagnostic delays. The Gaucher Earlier Diagnosis Consensus (GED‐C) initiative proposed a point‐scoring system (PSS) based on the signs and covariables that are most indicative of GD to help clinicians identify which individuals to test for GD. Aims: To validate the PSS retrospectively in a test population including patients with GD and other conditions with overlapping manifestations. Methods: Four cohorts of adults with GD, liver disease (LD), haematological malignancy (HM) or immune thrombocytopenia were identified from hospital records. Clinical data were audited for GED‐C factors identified as potentially indicative of GD and aggregate scores calculated (sum of scores/number of factors) based on published PSS weightings. Threshold discriminatory PSS scores, sensitivity and specificity were determined by receiver‐operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Among 100 patients (GD, n = 25; non‐GD, n = 75), analyses based on 11 possible factors estimated group mean (standard deviation) PSS scores of: GD (n = 14), 1.08 (0.25); non‐GD (n = 38), 0.58 (0.31). Mean between‐group difference (95% confidence interval (CI)) was (−0.49 (−0.68, −0.31)) and area under the ROC analysis curve (95% CI) was 0.88 (0.78, 0.97). A threshold PSS score of 0.82 identified all 14 patients with GD in the analysis set (100% sensitivity) and 27 of 38 patients in the non‐GD group (71% specificity). Patients with LD and HM were most likely to have manifestations overlapping GD. Conclusions: Preliminary validation of the GED‐C PSS discriminated effectively between patients with GD and those with overlapping signs

Exploring the patient journey to diagnosis of Gaucher disease from the perspective of 212 patients with Gaucher disease and 16 Gaucher expert physicians

Gaucher disease (GD) is a rare hereditary disorder caused by a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme β-glucocerebrosidase. Diagnosis is challenging owing to a wide variability in clinical manifestations and severity of symptoms. Many patients may experience marked delays in obtaining a definitive diagnosis. The two surveys reported herein aimed to explore the patient journey to diagnosis of GD from the perspectives of Gaucher expert physicians and patients. Findings from the surveys revealed that many patients experienced diagnostic delays and misdiagnoses, with nearly 1 in 6 patients stating that they were not diagnosed with GD for 7years or more after first consulting a doctor. Physicians and patients both reported multiple referrals to different specialties before a diagnosis of GD was obtained, with primary care, haematology/haematology-oncology and paediatrics the main specialties to which patients first presented. Splenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and bone pain were reported as the most common medical problems at first presentation in both surveys. These findings support a clear need for straightforward and easy-to-follow guidance designed to assist non-specialists to identify earlier patients who are at risk of GD

18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosing infectious complications in patients with severe neutropenia after intensive chemotherapy for haematological malignancy or stem cell transplantation

Item does not contain fulltextPURPOSE: Between 30 and 50% of febrile neutropenic episodes are accounted for by infection. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a nonspecific parameter for infection and inflammation but might be employed as a trigger for diagnosis. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT can be used to detect inflammatory foci in neutropenic patients with elevated CRP and whether it helps to direct treatment. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients with neutropenia as a result of intensive chemotherapy for haematological malignancies or myeloablative therapy for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation were prospectively included. (18)F-FDG PET/CT was added to the regular diagnostic workup once the CRP level rose above 50 mg/l. RESULTS: Pathological FDG uptake was found in 26 of 28 cases despite peripheral neutrophil counts less than 0.1 x 10(-9)/l in 26 patients: in the digestive tract in 18 cases, around the tract of the central venous catheter (CVC) in 9 and in the lungs in 7 cases. FDG uptake in the CVC tract was associated with coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteraemia (p < 0.001) and deep venous thrombosis (p = 0.002). The number of patients having Streptococcus mitis bacteraemia appeared to be higher in patients with grade 3 oesophageal FDG uptake (p = 0.08). Pulmonary FDG uptake was associated with the presence of invasive fungal disease (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET/CT scanning during chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia and increased CRP is able to detect localized foci of infection and inflammation despite the absence of circulating neutrophils. Besides its potential role in detecting CVC-related infection during febrile neutropenia, the high negative predictive value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT is important for avoiding unnecessary diagnostic tests and therapy.1 januari 201

A randomized trial to assess the biological activity of short-term (pre-surgical) fulvestrant 500 mg plus anastrozole versus fulvestrant 500 mg alone or anastrozole alone on primary breast cancer

Introduction: Fulvestrant shows dose-dependent biological activity. Greater estrogen-receptor (ER) blockade may feasibly be achieved by combining fulvestrant with anastrozole. This pre-surgical study compared fulvestrant plus anastrozole versus either agent alone in patients with ER-positive breast cancer. Methods: In this double-blind, multicenter trial, 121 patients received: fulvestrant 500 mg on day 1 plus anastrozole 1 mg/day for 14-21 days (F+A); fulvestrant plus anastrozole placebo (F); or fulvestrant placebo plus anastrozole (A), 2-3 weeks before surgery. ER, progesterone-receptor (PgR), and Ki67 expression were determined from tumor biopsies before treatment and at surgery. Results: 103 paired samples were available (F, n = 35; F+A, n = 31; A, n = 37). All treatments significantly reduced mean ER expression from baseline (F: 41%, P = 0.0001; F+A: 39%, P = 0.0001; A: 13%, P = 0.0034). F and F+A led to greater reductions in ER versus A (both P = 0.0001); F+A did not lead to additional reductions versus F. PgR and Ki67 expression were significantly reduced with all treatments (means were 34% to 45%, and 75% to 85%, respectively; all P = 0.0001), with no differences between groups. Conclusions: In this short-term study, all treatments reduced ER expression, although F and F+A showed greater reductions than A. No significant differences were detected between the treatment groups in terms of PgR and Ki67 expression. No additional reduction in tumor biomarkers with combination treatment was observed, suggesting that F+A is unlikely to have further clinical benefit over F alone. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00259090

Foreword to ‘Quantitative and analytical relations in biochemistry’—a special issue in honour of Donald J. Winzor’s 80th birthday

The purpose of this special issue is to honour Professor Donald J. Winzor’s long career as a researcher and scientific mentor, and to celebrate the milestone of his 80th birthday. Throughout his career, Don has been renowned for his development of clever approximations to difficult quantitative relations governing a range of biophysical measurements. The theme of this special issue, ‘Quantitative and analytical relations in biochemistry’, was chosen to reflect this aspect of Don’s scientific approach