The Composite Species Concept: A Rigorous Basis for Cladistic Practice

Wetensch. publicatieFaculteit der Wijsbegeert

A revision of the genus Kunstleria (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae)

A revision of the genus Kunstleria Prain is presented here. Seven species occur in the Malesian region, while one is found in Kerala (India). Two new species are described, K. geesinkii and K. sarawakensis, while four others are put into synonymy: K. borneensis and K. atroviolacea are regarded as synonymous with K. forbesii, and K. elmeri and K derryi are conspecific with K. ridleyi. A key, distribution maps and descriptions are given

Internodons as equivalence classes in genealogical networks: Building-blocks for a rigorous species concept

Among the options suggested in phylogenetic systematics to solve the species problem is the Hennigian or internodal species concept. This concept interprets species as parts of the genealogical network of individual organisms between two successive permanent splits or between a permanent split and an extinction event. Though this option is at present not favoured by phylogeneticists, we believe that, to solve the species problem, there is no alternative to finding a satisfactory partition of the genealogical network. In previous work a formal definition has been developed of Hennigian or internodal species (called internodons here), based on a logical relation between individual organisms. In this paper, we prove that this definition indeed partitions genealogical networks exhaustively into mutually exclusive entities, by showing that the defining relation is an equivalence relation. Although internodons should not themselves be seen as species, they are essential building-blocks for any satisfying species concept

A posteriori and a priori methodologies for testing hypotheses of causal processes in vicariance biogeography

Methods used in vicariance biogeography fall into the categories of a posteriori methods (e.g., Component Compatibility Analysis and Brooks Parsimony Analysis) and a priori methods (e.g., Component Analysis, Reconciled Tree Analysis, and Three Area Statement Analysis). Each category corresponds to a particular methodology that arrives at general area cladograms by testing null hypotheses in a particular way. A posteriori methods assume the process of vicariance only (A0) as a common cause of the distribution of different monophyletic groups of taxa under the null hypothesis. Whenever a parsimony analysis of combined data from these monophyletic groups results in a general area cladogram with homoplasy, the null hypothesis is rejected and extinction and dispersal are invoked a posteriori as ad hoc process explanations. A priori methods assume not only vicariance (A0) but also combinations of vicariance with the processes of extinction (A1) and dispersal (A2) as possible causes of the distribution of the taxa of different monophyletic groups. Each assumed set of processes corresponds to a different null hypothesis. Under the assumption of independence and thus additivity of the processes involved, the sets of area cladograms obtained under A0, A1, and A2 from data of each monophyletic group must be inclusive (requirement I). Whenever no congruent area cladograms are found in the intersection of sets of area cladograms derived under the same assumption for different monophyletic groups (II), the corresponding null hypothesis is rejected