International Consensus Statement on Rhinology and Allergy: Rhinosinusitis

Background: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR‐RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR‐RS‐2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence‐based findings of the document. Methods: ICAR‐RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence‐based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence‐based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary. Results: ICAR‐RS‐2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence‐based management algorithm is provided. Conclusion: This ICAR‐RS‐2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence‐based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS

Increasing the Use of Advance Directives in Medical Outpatients

OBJECTIVE: We studied whether a simple educational intervention would increase patient completion of advance directives and discussions on end-of-life issues. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: One hundred eighty-seven outpatients of a primary care internal medicine clinic. INTERVENTION: Study subjects attended a 1-hour interactive seminar and received an informational pamphlet and advance directive forms. Control subjects received by mail the pamphlet and forms only. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Completion of the advance directive was the main measurement. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics of either group. Follow-up at 1 month revealed advance directive completion in 38% of study versus 24% of control subjects (p = .04), and discussions on advance planning in 73% of study versus 57% of control subjects (p = .02). Patients most likely to complete the documents were white, married, or attendees at the educational seminar. CONCLUSIONS: Interactive group seminars for medical outpatients increased discussions and use of written advance directives

Practical Methods to Increase Use of Advance Medical Directives

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of two means for increasing the use of advance medical directives: written materials only versus written materials and an educational videotape. DESIGN: Population-based, randomized controlled trial with 3-month follow up. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Colorado Region, a not-for-profit group-model health maintenance organization. PARTICIPANTS: A population-based sample of all 1,302 members aged 75 years and older who used the Franklin Medical Office, excluding 55 persons who died or disenrolled during the study period or were identified by their physicians as blind or cognitively impaired. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects were mailed a 10-page cartoon-illustrated educational pamphlet on patient choices, a selection of Colorado advance medical directive forms, and a guide to their completion; 619 subjects also were mailed a 20-minute videotape on advance directives. Both groups had access to a study nurse for assistance in completing and placing advance medical directives. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main outcome measure is the proportion of subjects who placed a directive in their medical record for the first time. Placement rates increased almost identically, from 21.2% to 35.0% in the written materials-only group and from 18.9% to 32.6% in the group receiving the videotape (95% confidence interval for difference −0.04, 0.04, p = .952). CONCLUSIONS: In an elderly population with a substantial baseline placement rate, mailing of written materials substantially increased placement of an advance directive in the medical record, but the addition of a videotape did not. Mailing the video did increase the use of treatment trials and made patients more aware of reasons not to use advance directives