KiDS & Euclid:Cosmological implications of a pseudo angular power spectrum analysis of KiDS-1000 cosmic shear tomography

We present a tomographic weak lensing analysis of the Kilo Degree Survey Data Release 4 (KiDS-1000) using a new pseudo angular power spectrum estimator (\pcl) under development for the ESA Euclid mission. Over 21 million galaxies with shape information are divided into five tomographic redshift bins ranging from 0.1 to 1.2 in photometric redshift. We measure \pcl{} using eight bands in the multipole range $7

Are dumbbell brightest cluster members signposts to galaxy cluster activity?

We assemble a sample of galaxy clusters whose brightest members are dumbbell galaxies and compare them with a control sample in order to investigate if they are the result of recent mergers. We show that the dumbbell sample is no more likely than other clusters to exhibit subclustering. However, they are much more likely to have at least one dumbbell component possessing a significant peculiar velocity with respect to the parent cluster than a non-dumbbell brightest cluster member. We interpret this in the context of seeing the clusters at various stages of post-merger relaxation.Comment: 10 pages, 2 figures, accepted for publication in PAS

Euclid preparation:XXVIII. Modelling of the weak lensing angular power spectrum

This work considers which higher-order effects in modelling the cosmic shear angular power spectra must be taken into account for Euclid. We identify which terms are of concern, and quantify their individual and cumulative impact on cosmological parameter inference from Euclid. We compute the values of these higher-order effects using analytic expressions, and calculate the impact on cosmological parameter estimation using the Fisher matrix formalism. We review 24 effects and find the following potentially need to be accounted for: the reduced shear approximation, magnification bias, source-lens clustering, source obscuration, local Universe effects, and the flat Universe assumption. Upon computing these explicitly, and calculating their cosmological parameter biases, using a maximum multipole of $\ell=5000$, we find that the magnification bias, source-lens clustering, source obscuration, and local Universe terms individually produce significant (\,>0.25\sigma) cosmological biases in one or more parameters, and accordingly must be accounted for. In total, over all effects, we find biases in $\Omega_{\rm m}$, $\Omega_{\rm b}$, $h$, and $\sigma_{8}$ of $0.73\sigma$, $0.28\sigma$, $0.25\sigma$, and $-0.79\sigma$, respectively, for flat $\Lambda$CDM. For the $w_0w_a$CDM case, we find biases in $\Omega_{\rm m}$, $\Omega_{\rm b}$, $h$, $n_{\rm s}$, $\sigma_{8}$, and $w_a$ of $1.49\sigma$, $0.35\sigma$, $-1.36\sigma$, $1.31\sigma$, $-0.84\sigma$, and $-0.35\sigma$, respectively; which are increased relative to the $\Lambda$CDM due to additional degeneracies as a function of redshift and scale

Euclid preparation: XXI. Intermediate-redshift contaminants in the search for z>6 galaxies within the Euclid Deep Survey

The author list was incorrect in the published version. The name of the collaboration has been added here