10 research outputs found
Antifungal activities of bacillus subtilis lipopeptides to two venturia inaequalis strains possessing different tebuconazole sensitivity
Within the framework of biocontrol development, three natural substances produced by Bacillus subtilis, called lipopeptides, have been studied: fengycin (F), surfactin (S), and mycosubtilin (M). Their antifungal properties were tested in vitro, in liquid medium, on two strains of Venturia inaequalis, ascomycete fungi causing apple scab. These two strains were, respectively sensitive and less sensitive to tebuconazole, an active substance of the triazole family. These three molecules were tested on their own, in binary (FS, FM, SM) and ternary mixtures (FSM). The antifungal activities of lipopeptides were estimated by calculating an IC50, compared to tebuconazole chemical substance. In tests involving the sensitive strain, all lipopeptide modalities exhibited antifungal activity. However, modalities involving fengycin and its mixtures exhibited the best antifungal activities; the activity of fengycin alone being very similar to that of tebuconazole. Interestingly, regarding the strain with reduced sensitivity to tebuconazole, surfactin and fengycin alone were not efficient while mycosubtilin and the different mixtures showed interesting antifungal activities. Specifically, the antifungal activity of FS and FSM mixture were equivalent to that of tebuconazole. For both fungal strains, microscopic observations revealed important morphological modifications in the presence of fengycin and in a less important proportion in the presence of surfactin but not in the presence of mycosubtilin. Overall, this study highlights the diversity in mode of action of lipopeptides on apple scab strains. © 2019 Desmyttere, Deweer, Muchembled, Sahmer, Jacquin, Coutte and Jacques
Protection efficacy and modes of action of two resistance inducers on wheat against septoria tritici blotch
International audienceSeptoria tritici blotch caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola is one of the most devastating foliar diseases of wheat. Disease control relies heavily on fungicides, but frequent development of fungal resistance and the negative impact of their extensive use on the environment and human health increasingly compromise this control strategy. Plant resistance inducers could be an alternative to conventional fungicides to control in a more durable manner this pathogen. Here, we tested in the greenhouse two resistance inducers (FSOV7 and FSOV10) on two wheat cultivars, Alixan (susceptible) and Altigo (resistant), against M. graminicola. FSOV7 conferred a significant protection level on both cultivars, while FSOV10 conferred a significant protection level on the resistant cv. Altigo only. Furthermore, the modes of action of the two inducers were examined using cytological, biochemical and molecular approaches. In planta, investigation of the infection process showed that FSOV10 significantly reduced fungal spore germination, whereas FSOV7 did not. An association of protection efficacy with a decrease of fungal biomass and fungal β-1, 4-endoxylanase and protease activities was observed in both cultivars. However, no association of plant peroxidase activity with protection efficacy was recorded, whatever the cultivar and the resistance inducer. A RT-qPCR assay revealed significant inductions of the expression of genes involved in different defence pathways; further statistical analyses should determine which genes are associated with the observed protection efficacies. This study showed significant inducer-cultivar interactions on wheat against M. graminicola and allowed us to investigate the modes of action on wheat of the two studied resistance inducers
A Plant Nutrient-and Microbial Protein-Based Resistance Inducer Elicits Wheat Cultivar-Dependent Resistance Against Zymoseptoria tritici
International audienceThe induction of plant defense mechanisms by resistance inducers is an attractive and innovative alternative to reduce the use of fungicides on wheat against Zymoseptoria tritici, the responsible agent of Septoria tritici blotch (STB). Under controlled conditions, we investigated the resistance induction in three wheat cultivars with different susceptible levels to STB as a response to a treatment with a sulfur, manganese sulfate, and protein-based resistance inducer (NECTAR Céréales). While no direct antigermination effect of the product was observed in planta, more than 50% reduction of both symptoms and sporulation were recorded on the three tested cultivars. However, an impact of the wheat genotype on resistance induction was highlighted, which affects host penetration, cell colonization, and the production of cell-wall degrading enzymes by the fungus. Moreover, in the most susceptible cultivar Alixan, the product upregulated POX2, PAL, PR1, and GLUC gene expression in both noninoculated and inoculated plants and CHIT2 in noninoculated plants only. In contrast, defense responses induced in Altigo, the most resistant cultivar, seem to be more specifically mediated by the phenylpropanoid pathway in noninoculated as well as inoculated plants, since PAL and CHS were most specifically upregulated in this cultivar. In Premio, the moderate resistant cultivar, NECTAR Céréales elicits mainly the octadecanoid pathway, via LOX and AOS induction in noninoculated plants. We concluded that this complex resistance-inducing product protects wheat against Z. tritici by stimulating the cultivar-dependent plant defense mechanisms
Protection efficacy and modes of action of two resistance inducers on wheat against septoria tritici blotch
International audienceSeptoria tritici blotch caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola is one of the most devastating foliar diseases of wheat. Disease control relies heavily on fungicides, but frequent development of fungal resistance and the negative impact of their extensive use on the environment and human health increasingly compromise this control strategy. Plant resistance inducers could be an alternative to conventional fungicides to control in a more durable manner this pathogen. Here, we tested in the greenhouse two resistance inducers (FSOV7 and FSOV10) on two wheat cultivars, Alixan (susceptible) and Altigo (resistant), against M. graminicola. FSOV7 conferred a significant protection level on both cultivars, while FSOV10 conferred a significant protection level on the resistant cv. Altigo only. Furthermore, the modes of action of the two inducers were examined using cytological, biochemical and molecular approaches. In planta, investigation of the infection process showed that FSOV10 significantly reduced fungal spore germination, whereas FSOV7 did not. An association of protection efficacy with a decrease of fungal biomass and fungal β-1, 4-endoxylanase and protease activities was observed in both cultivars. However, no association of plant peroxidase activity with protection efficacy was recorded, whatever the cultivar and the resistance inducer. A RT-qPCR assay revealed significant inductions of the expression of genes involved in different defence pathways; further statistical analyses should determine which genes are associated with the observed protection efficacies. This study showed significant inducer-cultivar interactions on wheat against M. graminicola and allowed us to investigate the modes of action on wheat of the two studied resistance inducers