The influence of ethylene and ethylene modulators on shoot organogenesis in tomato

[EN] The influence of ethylene and ethylene modulators on the in vitro organogenesis of tomato was studied using a highly regenerating accession of the wild tomato Solanum pennellii and an F1 plant resulting from a cross between Solanum pennellii and Solanum lycopersicum cv. Anl27, which is known to have a low regeneration frequency. Four ethylene-modulating compounds, each at four levels, were used, namely: cobalt chloride (CoCl 2), which inhibits the production of ethylene; AgNO 3 (SN), which inhibits ethylene action; and Ethephon and the precursor 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC), which both promote ethylene synthesis. Leaf explants of each genotype were incubated on shoot induction medium supplemented with each of these compounds at 0, 10 or 15 days following bud induction. The results obtained in our assays indicate that ethylene has a significant influence on tomato organogenesis. Concentrations of ethylene lower than the optimum (according to genotype) at the beginning of the culture may decrease the percentage of explants with buds (B), produce a delay in their appearance, or indeed inhibit bud formation. This was observed in S. pennellii and the F1 explants cultured on media with SN (5.8-58.0 ¿M) as well as in the F1 explants cultured on medium with 21.0 ¿M CoCl 2. The percentage of explants with shoots (R) and the mean number of shoots per explant with shoots (PR) also diminished in media that contained SN. Shoots isolated from these explants were less developed compared to those isolated from control explants. On the other hand, ethylene supplementation may contribute to enhancing shoot development. The number of isolable shoots from S. pennellii explants doubled in media with ACC (9.8-98.0 ¿M). Shoots isolated from explants treated with ethylene releasing compounds showed a higher number of nodes when ACC and Ethephon were added at 10 days (in F1 explants) or at 15 days (in S. pennellii) after the beginning of culture. Thus, the importance of studying not only the concentration but also the timing of the application of regulators when developing regeneration protocols has been made manifest. An excess of ethylene supplementation may produce an inhibitory effect, as was observed when using Ethephon (17.2-69.0 ¿M). These results show the involvement of ethylene in tomato organogenesis and lead us to believe that ethylene supplementation may contribute to enhancing regeneration and shoot development in tomato. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.Carlos Trujillo has a predoctoral fellowship from the Spanish 'Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia'. This work has been funded by Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (PAID 05-10). The technical assistance of N. Palacios and the revision of the manuscript's English by J. Bergen are gratefully acknowledged.Trujillo Moya, C.; Gisbert Domenech, MC. (2012). The influence of ethylene and ethylene modulators on shoot organogenesis in tomato. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 111(1):141-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0168-zS1411481111Abeles FB, Morgan PW, Saltveit ME (1992) Ethylene in plant biology. Academic Press, San DiegoBhatia P, Ashwath N, Senaratna T, David M (2004) Tissue culture studies of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 78:1–21Bhatia P, Ashwath N, Midmore DJ (2005) Effects of genotype, explant orientation, and wounding on shoot regeneration in tomato. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 41:457–464Biddington NL (1992) The Influence of ethylene in plant-tissue culture. Plant Growth Regul 11:173–187Brown DC, Thorpe TA (1995) Crop improvement through tissue culture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 11(4):409–415Chraibi KMB, Latche A, Roustan JP, Fallot J (1991) Stimulation of shoot regeneration from cotyledons of Helianthus annuus by the ethylene inhibitors,silver and cobalt. Plant Cell Rep 10:204–207Devi R, Dhaliwal MS, Kaur A, Gosal SS (2008) Effect of growth regulators on in vitro morphogenic response of tomato. Indian J Biotechnol 7:526–530Dias LLC, Santa-Catarina C, Ribeiro DM, Barros RS, Floh EIS, Otoni WC (2009) Ethylene and polyamine production patterns during in vitro shoot organogenesis of two passion fruit species as affected by polyamines and their inhibitor. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 99:199–208Dimasi-Theriou K, Economou AS (1995) Ethylene enhances shoot formation in cultures of the peach rootstock GF-677 (Prunus persica × P. amygdalus). Plant Cell Rep 15:87–90Gisbert C, Arrillaga I, Roig LA, Moreno V (1999) Adquisition of a collection of Lycopersicon pennellii (Corr. D’Arcy) transgenic plants with uidA and nptII marker genes. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 74:105–109Hughes KW (1981) In vitro ecology: exogenous factors affecting growth and morphogenesis in plant culture systems. Environ Exp Bot 21:281–288Huxter TJ, Thorpe TA, Reid DM (1981) Shoot initiation in light- and darkgrown tobacco callus: the role of ethylene. Physiol Plant 53:319–326Kumar PP, Lakshmanan P, Thorpe TA (1998) Regulation of morphogenesis in plant tissue culture by ethylene. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 34:94–103Lima JE, Benedito VA, Figueira A, Peres LEP (2009) Callus, shoot and hairy root formation in vitro as affected by the sensitivity to auxin and ethylene in tomato mutants. Plant Cell Rep 28:1169–1177Lu J, Vahala J, Pappinen A (2011) Involvement of ethylene in somatic embryogenesis in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 107:25–33Mohiuddin AKM, Chowdhury MKU, Abdullah ZC, Napis S (1997) Influence of silver nitrate (ethylene inhibitor) on cucumber in vitro shoot regeneration. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 51:75–78Moshkov IE, Novikova GV, Hall MA, George EF (2008) Plant Growth Regulators III: ethylene. In: George EF, Hall MA, Klerk G-JD (eds) Plant Propaga-tion by Tissue Culture, vol 1. 3rd edn. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 239–248Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497Osman MG, Khalafalla MM (2010) Promotion of in vitro shoot formation from shoot tip of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Omdurman) by ethylene inhibitors. Int J Curr Res 4:82–86Ptak A, El Tahchy A, Wyzgolik G, Henry M, Laurain-Mattar D (2010) Effects of ethylene on somatic embryogenesis and galantamine content in Leucojum aestivum L. cultures. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 102:61–67Pua EC, Sim GE, Chi GL, Kong LF (1996) Synergistic effects of ethylene inhibitors and putrescine on shoot regeneration from hypocotyl explants of Chinese radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. longipinnatus Bailey) in vitro. Plant Cell Rep 15:685–690Reid MS (1995) Ethylene in plant growth, development and senescence. In: Davies PJ (ed) Plant hormones: physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology, 2nd edn. Kluwer Acad Publ, The Netherlands, pp 486–508Trujillo-Moya C, Gisbert C, Vilanova S, Nuez F (2011) Localization of QTLs for in vitro plant regeneration in tomato. BMC Plant Biol 11: art.140Tsuchisaka A, Theologis A (2004) Heterodimeric interactions among the 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase polypeptides encoded by the Arabidopsis gene family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:2275–2280Vogel JP, Woeste KE, Theologis A, Kieber JJ (1998) Recessive and dominant mutations in the ethylene biosynthetic gene ACS5 of Arabidopsis confer cytokinin insensitivity and ethylene overproduction, respectively. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:4766–477

MULTIPLICAÇÃO IN VITRO DE PORTA-ENXERTOS DO GÊNERO PRUNUS SOB DIFERENTES CONCENTRAÇÕES DE BAP EM DOIS MEIOS DE CULTURA IN VITRO MULTIPLICATION OF PRUNUS ROOTSTOCKS IN DIFFERENT BAP CONCENTRATIONS IN TWO CULTURE MEDIA

Este trabalho teve como objetivo determinar a melhor concentração de BAP (6-benzilaminopurina) e meio de cultura para a multiplicação in vitro de porta-enxertos de Prunus sp., recentemente introduzidos no Brasil. Os porta-enxertos G x N22, GF 677, Mr.S 2/5, Marianna e Mirabolano foram testados em dois meios de cultura, meio MS e meio MS ¾ (reduzido em 25% dos sais do meio inteiro), combinados com quatro concentrações da citocinina BAP: 0,1; 0,3; 0,5 e 0,7 mg.L-1. Observou-se que os genótipos apresentaram comportamentos diferentes entre si em relação às concentrações de BAP e aos meios. Concluiu-se que, para os porta-enxertos G x N22 e Mr.S 2/5, o melhor meio de multiplicação é o MS ¾ com BAP na concentração de 0,7 mg.L-1; para o porta-enxerto Marianna, o meio MS com BAP na concentração de 0,7 mg.L-1; para o porta-enxerto Mirabolano, o meio MS ¾ com BAP na concentração de 0,5 mg.L-1, sendo que, para este porta-enxerto, o BAP exerce efeito negativo sobre o tamanho das brotações, independentemente do tipo de meio. Já para o porta-enxerto G x N22, este efeito se fez notar apenas no meio MS. O porta-enxerto GF 677 não apresentou bons resultados na propagação in vitro.<br>The purpose of this work was to determine the best BAP concentration and culture media for the in vitro multiplication of Prunus rootstocks starting from nodal segments. The rootstocks G x N22, GF 677, Mr.S 2/5, Marianna and Mirabolano were tested in two culture media (MS and MS ¾) combined with four BAP concentrations (0.1; 0.3; 0.5 and 0.7 mg.L-1). It was observed that the genotypes had different performance as the two media and BAP concentrations are concerned. BAP provided better results in the MS ¾ for the rootstocks G x N22 and Mr.S 2/5. For 'Marianna', the best results were found in the MS at 0.7 mg.L-1 BAP. 'Mirabolano', showed better results in the MS ¾ at 0.5 mg.L-1 BAP and in the two tested media, the shoot length decreased with the increase for BAP. The rootstock G x N22, had the same effect only in the MS medium. The rootstock GF 677 didn't present good results in micropropagation