10 research outputs found

    An evaluation of the technique of use of metered dose inhaler administration in bronchial asthma children

    Get PDF
    Background: Inadequate understanding and performance of drug administration using metered-dose inhaler (MDI) in paediatric population affects therapeutic outcome. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of two educational interventional methods for usage of MDI in paediatric patients of bronchial asthma.Methods: This prospective, interventional study was done in paediatric asthma patients who were prescribed drugs with (MDI) with/without spacer at outpatient department of pediatrics. Patients were divided in group A (video) or group B (leaflet) as per random table method and method to use MDI was assessed by using checklist as per WHO guide to good prescribing at baseline. Investigator taught the technique by a video (group A) and leaflet (group B) to the selected population. Patients were followed up after 15 days and assessed for use of MDI using the same checklist. Data were analysed by using paired and unpaired ‘t’-test.Results: A total of 100 pediatric asthma patients were included in study group A (50) and group B (50). The average no. of steps (WHO checklist) followed was significantly improved at post intervention in both group A (with spacer, p<0.0001) as well as B (without spacer, p<0.05). Although average no. of steps followed were more in group A, no significant difference was found between two groups after intervention.Conclusions: As video is an audio-visual method of demonstration, and hence help us memorise the step of inhalational technique in pediatric patients. Repeated demonstration/education to patients/caregivers may improve the method of MDI usage

    An intensive monitoring of adverse drug reactions in pediatric hospitalized patients of a tertiary care hospital

    Get PDF
    Background: Children are at a higher risk of therapeutic failure due to major difference in pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics of drugs, off-label use and divergence of their illness from adult. The safety of drugs used in adult patients cannot be extrapolated to a pediatric age group. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the incidence and overall pattern of adverse drug reactions in pediatric patients hospitalized in pediatric wards at a tertiary care hospital in India.Methods: Pediatric patients up to 12 years hospitalized in two randomly selected pediatric units were enrolled and followed up daily till discharge. Detailed information of patients and ADRs (adverse drug reactions) if any were recorded from case records. ADRs were assessed for incidence, onset, duration, management, outcome, causality, severity, preventability, seriousness and risk factors. Appropriateness of drug treatment in patients with ADRs was analyzed using Phadke’s criteria. Data was analyzed using student’s t test, ANOVA and Chi square test.Results: A total of 700 patients were enrolled (mean age 3.95±0.12 years). A total of 66 ADRs observed in 58 patients. Intravenous (70.4%) being most common route for ADRs. The incidence of ADRs was 8.28%. Majority of ADRs occurred within 1 day, commonly affected skin and appendages followed by (28.78%), GI (25.75%) ADRs were frequently associated with antimicrobials (69.38%) and vaccines and sera (12.24%). Majority of reactions were mild (56%%), non-serious (77.2%), not preventable (95.4%), recovered completely at discharge (83.33%) and had possible (77.2%) causal association with suspect drug. Age group 0-3 years and prescription of ≥5 drugs were risk factors for occurrence of ADRs. Semi rational drug therapy was observed in 65.5% patients.Conclusions: Clinicians should be vigilant regarding occurrence of ADRs in pediatrics especially during the first week of hospitalization. Risk factors like 0-3 years of age and multiple drugs should be taken into consideration during treatment of these patients to help minimize adverse drug reactions

    Evaluation of trigger tool method for adverse drug reaction reporting by nursing staff at a tertiary care teaching hospital

    Get PDF
    Background: To sensitize nurses about Trigger Tool Method (TTM) and to evaluate the impact of TTM on adverse drug event (ADE) reporting by nurses at a tertiary care teaching hospital in India.Methods: This was prospective, interventional, single center study conducted among nursing health professionals of Civil Hospital Ahmedabad (CHA) posted in Medicine Department. They were sensitized about ADE reporting, pharmacovigilance, methods of ADRs reporting and details about TTM. Also, a list of 17 triggers was prepared by the investigator and given to nurses. They were educated to report ADEs using TTM. At the initiation and end of study, questionnaires were given to evaluate knowledge, attitude and practice of ADR reporting among participant nurses. All triggers and ADEs reported were analyzed in terms of association between them, effectiveness of trigger in detecting an ADR and in terms of Positive Predictive Value (PPV). Reported ADRs were also assessed for causality, severity and preventability.Results: A total 758 patients were admitted during the study period in the respective medicine department. List of 17 triggers consists of 9 drug triggers (DT), 1 laboratory trigger (LT) and 7 patient triggers (PT). Of these 17 triggers, 14 triggers were identified by nurses. These 14 triggers were noticed 130 times. These included DT (100 times), LT (0 times) and PT (30 times). Of the various triggers observed, 7 DT and 4 PT were related to ADRs. Hence, 11 triggers (64.70%) were positive (related to ADRs), out of 17 total triggers under evaluation. 21 ADRs were observed using TTM by nurses.Conclusions: The TTM helps to detect and report ADRs by nurses. Educational interventions about TTM help in better detection and reporting of ADRs

    Steroid-induced central serous retinopathy

    No full text
    A-24 year-old male was prescribed prednisolone (60 mg/day) for left sided facial palsy. After three days of therapy, the patient complained of black spots in his vision in right eye. Fluorescein angiography of right eye showed evidence of central serous retinopathy (CSR). Prednisolone dose was withdrawn gradually and the patient improved within a week. There were no other systemic or ophthalmic diseases reported by the patient, which could have caused this condition. An improvement after dechallenge confirmed steroid-induced CSR. Recurrent CSR is known to cause permanent loss of vision. Hence, awareness regarding this adverse drug reaction (ADR) with steroids and its reporting can minimize this complication and help in better patient management

    IMPACT OF CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS ON ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTING BY NURSING HEALTH PROFESSIONALS AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

    No full text
    Objectives: The objectives of the study were to evaluate the impact of certain educational interventions on adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting by nursing health professionals at a tertiary care hospital. Methods: Knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of the nurses regarding ADR reporting were evaluated before and after interventions using a KAP questionnaire. Educational interventions carried out among the nurses were workshops, booklets, SMSes, personal briefings, and posters. Number and quality of ADR reported by nurses in pre-intervention (3 months), intervention (10 months), and post-intervention (3 months) phase were compared. Results: There was a significant increase in response rate to questionnaires in the post-intervention phase (post-IP) (97.74%) as compared to pre-intervention (91.28%) phase (pre-IP). The knowledge score of the nurses increased significantly in post-IP (11.65 ± 2.14) as compared to the pre-intervention (6.98 ± 2.46) phase. No ADR was reported by nurses in pre-IP. Thirty nurses reported 30 ADRs in the intervention phase and six nurses reported six ADRs in the post-IP. The mean score of completeness of ADR notification forms decreased significantly in post-IP. Maximum ADRs (10) were reported after the workshops. Conclusion: Educational interventions improved the KAP of ADR reporting by nurses, albeit temporary. This suggests the need of continuous educational interventions

    An evaluation of knowledge, attitude, and practice of adverse drug reaction reporting among prescribers at a tertiary care hospital

    No full text
    Objectives: Spontaneous reporting is an important tool in pharmacovigilance. However, its success depends on cooperative and motivated prescribers. Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) by prescribers is a common problem. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) regarding ADR reporting among prescribers at the Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad, to get an insight into the causes of under-reporting of ADRs. Materials and Methods: A pretested KAP questionnaire comprising of 15 questions (knowledge 6, attitude 5, and practice 4) was administered to 436 prescribers. The questionnaires were assessed for their completeness (maximum score 20) and the type of responses regarding ADR reporting. Microsoft Excel worksheet (Microsoft Office 2007) and Chi-Square test were used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 260 (61%) prescribers completed the questionnaire (mean score of completion 18.04). The response rate of resident doctors (70.7%) was better than consultants (34.5%) (P < 0.001). ADR reporting was considered important by 97.3% of the respondents; primarily for improving patient safety (28.8%) and identifying new ADRs (24.6%). A majority of the respondents opined that they would like to report serious ADRs (56%). However, only 15% of the prescribers had reported ADRs previously. The reasons cited for this were lack of information on where (70%) and how (68%) to report and the lack of access to reporting forms (49.2%). Preferred methods for reporting were e-mail (56%) and personal communication (42%). Conclusion: The prescribers are aware of the ADRs and the importance of their reporting. However, under reporting and lack of knowledge about the reporting system are clearly evident. Creating awareness about ADR reporting and devising means to make it easy and convenient may aid in improving spontaneous reporting

    An evaluation of the impact of antidiabetic medication on treatment satisfaction and quality of life in patients of diabetes mellitus

    No full text
    Aims: This study aims to measure the quality of life (QOL), treatment satisfaction, and tolerability of antidiabetic drugs in patients suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: The prospective, observational study was conducted in consenting patients of type 2 DM attending the outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in Western India. The QOL instrument for Indian diabetes (QOLID) patients questionnaire and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire were administered to all patients at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months of treatment. Tukey–Kramer comparison test was used to analyze the difference in QOLID scores in various domains at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. WHO-UMC scale, Naranjo's probability scale, Hartwig and Siegel, and Schumock and Thornton modified criteria were used to analyze the adverse drug reactions. Results: A male preponderance was observed in 200 patients enrolled in the study. The mean duration of diabetes was 10.96 ± 5.99 years. The patients received metformin alone (40), metformin and glipizide (47), metformin, glipizide and other oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) (78), and OHAs and insulin (35). A significant improvement in fasting and postprandial blood sugar was observed at 6 months as compared to the baseline (P < 0.05). A total of 39 (19.5%) patients suffered from adverse effects to metformin and insulin. Physical health and physical endurance improved in patients receiving metformin alone or in combination with glipizide as compared to patients receiving other OHAs and/or insulin. Treatment satisfaction, highest in patients receiving metformin and least in those receiving insulin, was unaltered during the study period. Conclusions: While polypharmacy is evident, using lesser medicines offers better treatment satisfaction and QOL in DM. Periodic assessment of QOL and treatment satisfaction are recommended in DM

    Evaluation of effectiveness of self-directed learning in 2nd Professional year medical undergraduates

    No full text
    Introduction: Self-directed learning (SDL) is one of the recommended teaching–learning methods for Indian medical graduates to become a lifelong learner. Methodology: The study was conducted in 2nd year medical undergraduates. A lecture (Cholinergic Transmission and Cholinergic Drugs) was conducted followed by sensitization of students for SDL method and sharing of SDL topic (organophosphate poisoning). After 3 days, in the 1st SDL session, students were sensitized for SDL topic. A pretest (multiple-choice questions [MCQs] of SDL topic) was administered and resource materials were shared at its end. In intersession period, case-based scenarios, trigger words, and videos were shared in a preformed WhatsApp group. During the 2nd session, facilitators facilitated discussion of the topic in small groups of students using case-based scenarios. Posttest (MCQs) for students and feedback for students and facilitators were administered. Results: Data collected from 61 students showed a statistically significant difference between the means of posttest compared to pretest (standard error: 2.45, P < 0.05, confidence interval – 95%). Posttest scores showed that more than 45% of the students answered correctly 80% of questions, compared to pretest. More than 70% of students and facilitators agreed/strongly agreed that SDL makes topic interesting and effective for teaching/learning and leads to better student–teacher interaction. About 70% of students and 55% of facilitators found that SDL method should be implemented for more topics in curriculum. Learning issues faced by 21 students (need for more information resources, time-consuming method, difficulty in remembering dosage schedule, clinically correlating topic, and language barrier during discussion) were solved by students using of other online and offline information sources, revising the topic and discussing with co-learners. Conclusion: SDL was helpful for students in improving knowledge, communication skills, and analyzing case-based scenarios for any given topic
    corecore